41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Spatial working memory deficits in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice reflect impaired short-term habituation: Evidence for Wagner's dual-process memory model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genetically modified mice, lacking the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit, are impaired on spatial working memory tasks, but display normal acquisition of spatial reference memory tasks. One explanation for this dissociation is that working memory, win-shift performance engages a GluA1-dependent, non-associative, short-term memory process through which animals choose relatively novel arms in preference to relatively familiar options. In contrast, spatial reference memory, as exemplified by the Morris water maze task, reflects a GluA1-independent, associative, long-term memory mechanism. These results can be accommodated by Wagner's dual-process model of memory in which short and long-term memory mechanisms exist in parallel and, under certain circumstances, compete with each other. According to our analysis, GluA1 −/− mice lack short-term memory for recently experienced spatial stimuli. One consequence of this impairment is that these stimuli should remain surprising and thus be better able to form long-term associative representations. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have recently shown that long-term spatial memory for recently visited locations is enhanced in GluA1 −/− mice, despite impairments in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Taken together, these results support a role for GluA1-containing AMPA receptors in short-term habituation, and in modulating the intensity or perceived salience of stimuli.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

          One of the most robust experience-related cortical dynamics is reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated. This reduction has been linked to performance improvements due to repetition and also used to probe functional characteristics of neural populations. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are as yet unknown. Here, we consider three models that have been proposed to account for repetition-related reductions in neural activity, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to account for the main properties of this phenomenon as measured with single-cell recordings and neuroimaging techniques. We also discuss future directions for distinguishing between these models, which will be important for understanding the neural consequences of repetition and for interpreting repetition-related effects in neuroimaging data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity.

              Activity-dependent changes in synaptic function are believed to underlie the formation of memories. Two prominent examples are long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), whose mechanisms have been the subject of considerable scrutiny over the past few decades. Here we review the growing literature that supports a critical role for AMPA receptor trafficking in LTP and LTD, focusing on the roles proposed for specific AMPA receptor subunits and their interacting proteins. While much work remains to understand the molecular basis for synaptic plasticity, recent results on AMPA receptor trafficking provide a clear conceptual framework for future studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Pergamon Press
                0028-3932
                1873-3514
                July 2010
                July 2010
                : 48
                : 8
                : 2303-2315
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK
                [b ]School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK
                [c ]Max-Planck Institute of Medical Research, Department of Molecular Neurobiology, D-69120 Heidelberg, Jahnstrasse 29, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding authors. Tel.: +44 1865 271377; fax: +44 1865 310447. david.sanderson@ 123456psy.ox.ac.uk david.bannerman@ 123456psy.ox.ac.uk
                Article
                NSY3617
                10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.018
                2938569
                20350557
                624c2999-24ff-4605-997f-9a11e24657f2
                © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 31 July 2009
                : 11 February 2010
                : 22 March 2010
                Categories
                Article

                Neurology
                spatial learning,recognition memory,synaptic plasticity,hippocampus,lesion,ampa receptors
                Neurology
                spatial learning, recognition memory, synaptic plasticity, hippocampus, lesion, ampa receptors

                Comments

                Comment on this article