4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical considerations in early-onset cerebral amyloid angiopathy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an important cerebral small vessel disease associated with brain haemorrhage and cognitive change. The commonest form, sporadic amyloid-β CAA, usually affects people in mid- to later life. However, early-onset forms, though uncommon, are increasingly recognized and may result from genetic or iatrogenic causes that warrant specific and focused investigation and management.

          In this review, we firstly describe the causes of early-onset CAA, including monogenic causes of amyloid-β CAA ( APP missense mutations and copy number variants; mutations of PSEN1 and PSEN2) and non-amyloid-β CAA (associated with ITM2B, CST3, GSN, PRNP and TTR mutations), and other unusual sporadic and acquired causes including the newly-recognized iatrogenic subtype. We then provide a structured approach for investigating early-onset CAA, and highlight important management considerations.

          Improving awareness of these unusual forms of CAA amongst healthcare professionals is essential for facilitating their prompt diagnosis, and an understanding of their underlying pathophysiology may have implications for more common, late-onset, forms of the disease.

          Abstract

          Banerjee et al. review the pathophysiology and management of early-onset cerebral amyloid angiopathy, including rare monogenic forms as well as unusual sporadic and acquired forms such as the newly recognised iatrogenic subtype.

          Related collections

          Most cited references343

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

          In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

            Summary Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a common accompaniment of ageing. Features seen on neuroimaging include recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunes, white matter hyperintensities, perivascular spaces, microbleeds, and brain atrophy. SVD can present as a stroke or cognitive decline, or can have few or no symptoms. SVD frequently coexists with neurodegenerative disease, and can exacerbate cognitive deficits, physical disabilities, and other symptoms of neurodegeneration. Terminology and definitions for imaging the features of SVD vary widely, which is also true for protocols for image acquisition and image analysis. This lack of consistency hampers progress in identifying the contribution of SVD to the pathophysiology and clinical features of common neurodegenerative diseases. We are an international working group from the Centres of Excellence in Neurodegeneration. We completed a structured process to develop definitions and imaging standards for markers and consequences of SVD. We aimed to achieve the following: first, to provide a common advisory about terms and definitions for features visible on MRI; second, to suggest minimum standards for image acquisition and analysis; third, to agree on standards for scientific reporting of changes related to SVD on neuroimaging; and fourth, to review emerging imaging methods for detection and quantification of preclinical manifestations of SVD. Our findings and recommendations apply to research studies, and can be used in the clinical setting to standardise image interpretation, acquisition, and reporting. This Position Paper summarises the main outcomes of this international effort to provide the STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer's disease.

              Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain, accompanied by synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Antibody-based immunotherapy against Aβ to trigger its clearance or mitigate its neurotoxicity has so far been unsuccessful. Here we report the generation of aducanumab, a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets aggregated Aβ. In a transgenic mouse model of AD, aducanumab is shown to enter the brain, bind parenchymal Aβ, and reduce soluble and insoluble Aβ in a dose-dependent manner. In patients with prodromal or mild AD, one year of monthly intravenous infusions of aducanumab reduces brain Aβ in a dose- and time-dependent manner. This is accompanied by a slowing of clinical decline measured by Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Mini Mental State Examination scores. The main safety and tolerability findings are amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. These results justify further development of aducanumab for the treatment of AD. Should the slowing of clinical decline be confirmed in ongoing phase 3 clinical trials, it would provide compelling support for the amyloid hypothesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                Brain
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                October 2023
                06 June 2023
                06 June 2023
                : 146
                : 10
                : 3991-4014
                Affiliations
                MRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Prion Diseases, UCL , London, W1W 7FF, UK
                MRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Prion Diseases, UCL , London, W1W 7FF, UK
                Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, WC1N 3BG, UK
                UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL , London, WC1E 6BT, UK
                The Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, Department of Clinical and Movement Disorders, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, W1 1PJ, UK
                Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, WC1N 3BG, UK
                MRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Prion Diseases, UCL , London, W1W 7FF, UK
                Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, WC1N 3BG, UK
                UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL , London, WC1E 6BT, UK
                Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, WC1N 3BG, UK
                Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, WC1N 3BG, UK
                UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL , London, WC1E 6BT, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Gargi Banerjee MRC Prion Unit at UCL, Institute of Prion Diseases Courtauld Building, 33 Cleveland Street, London W1W 7FF, UK E-mail: g.banerjee@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-7782
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2059-024X
                Article
                awad193
                10.1093/brain/awad193
                10545523
                37280119
                62fa9bcc-663b-42d2-bf1b-f607e626596d
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 09 August 2022
                : 16 April 2023
                : 01 May 2023
                : 06 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 24
                Funding
                Funded by: Alzheimer’s Research UK, DOI 10.13039/501100002283;
                Funded by: ARUK, DOI 10.13039/501100000319;
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research, DOI 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: Stroke Association, DOI 10.13039/501100000364;
                Funded by: University College London, DOI 10.13039/501100000765;
                Funded by: UCLH, DOI 10.13039/501100008721;
                Funded by: Brain Research UK, DOI 10.13039/100013790;
                Funded by: Weston Brain Institute, DOI 10.13039/100012479;
                Funded by: British Heart Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100000274;
                Funded by: Rosetrees Trust, DOI 10.13039/501100000833;
                Funded by: University of London, DOI 10.13039/501100000779;
                Funded by: core, DOI 10.13039/100006441;
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100000265;
                Funded by: NIHR UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre, DOI 10.13039/501100000659;
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Society, DOI 10.13039/501100000320;
                Categories
                Review Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01870

                Neurosciences
                alzheimer’s disease,cerebral amyloid angiopathy,dementia,early-onset,stroke
                Neurosciences
                alzheimer’s disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, dementia, early-onset, stroke

                Comments

                Comment on this article