4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Childhood Lead Exposure With Adult Personality Traits and Lifelong Mental Health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study assesses whether exposure to lead during childhood is associated with lifelong mental health disorder symptoms and difficult personality traits in adulthood.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is childhood lead exposure associated with the risk of mental illness or difficult personality traits in adulthood?

          Findings

          In this longitudinal cohort study of 579 New Zealand children followed up for more than 30 years, greater lead exposure in childhood was significantly associated with greater psychopathology across the life course and with difficult personality traits in adulthood.

          Meaning

          Childhood lead exposure may have long-term consequences for adult mental health and personality.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Millions of adults now entering middle age were exposed to high levels of lead, a developmental neurotoxin, as children. Although childhood lead exposure has been linked to disrupted behavioral development, the long-term consequences for adult mental and behavioral health have not been fully characterized.

          Objective

          To examine whether childhood lead exposure is associated with greater psychopathology across the life course and difficult adult personality traits.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective cohort study was based on a population-representative birth cohort of individuals born between April 1, 1972, and March 31, 1973, in Dunedin, New Zealand, the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Members were followed up in December 2012 when they were 38 years of age. Data analysis was performed from March 14, 2018, to October 24, 2018.

          Exposures

          Childhood lead exposure ascertained as blood lead levels measured at 11 years of age. Blood lead levels were unrelated to family socioeconomic status.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Primary outcomes were adult mental health disorder symptoms assessed through clinical interview at 18, 21, 26, 32, and 38 years of age and transformed through confirmatory factor analysis into continuous measures of general psychopathology and internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder symptoms (all standardized to a mean [SD] of 100 [15]) and adult personality assessed through informant report using the Big Five Personality Inventory (assessing neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) at 26, 32, and 38 years of age (all scores standardized to a mean [SD] of 0 [1]). Hypotheses were formulated after data collection; an analysis plan was posted in advance.

          Results

          Of 1037 original study members, 579 (55.8%) were tested for lead exposure at 11 years of age (311 [53.7%] male). The mean (SD) blood lead level was 11.08 (4.96) μg/dL. After adjusting for study covariates, each 5-μg/dL increase in childhood blood lead level was associated with a 1.34-point increase (95% CI, 0.11-2.57; P = .03) in general psychopathology, driven by internalizing (b = 1.41; 95% CI, 0.19-2.62; P = .02) and thought disorder (b = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.06-2.54; P = .04) symptoms. Each 5-μg/dL increase in childhood blood lead level was also associated with a 0.10-SD increase in neuroticism (95% CI, 0.02-0.08; P = .02), a 0.09-SD decrease in agreeableness (95% CI, −0.18 to −0.01; P = .03), and a 0.14-SD decrease in conscientiousness (95% CI, −0.25 to −0.03; P = .01). There were no statistically significant associations with informant-rated extraversion (b = −0.09; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.004; P = .06) and openness to experience (b = −0.07; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.03; P = .15).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this multidecade, longitudinal study of lead-exposed children, higher childhood blood lead level was associated with greater psychopathology across the life course and difficult adult personality traits. Childhood lead exposure may have long-term consequences for adult mental health and personality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children’s Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis

          Lead is a confirmed neurotoxin, but questions remain about lead-associated intellectual deficits at blood lead levels < 10 μg/dL and whether lower exposures are, for a given change in exposure, associated with greater deficits. The objective of this study was to examine the association of intelligence test scores and blood lead concentration, especially for children who had maximal measured blood lead levels < 10 μg/dL. We examined data collected from 1,333 children who participated in seven international population-based longitudinal cohort studies, followed from birth or infancy until 5–10 years of age. The full-scale IQ score was the primary outcome measure. The geometric mean blood lead concentration of the children peaked at 17.8 μg/dL and declined to 9.4 μg/dL by 5–7 years of age; 244 (18%) children had a maximal blood lead concentration < 10 μg/dL, and 103 (8%) had a maximal blood lead concentration < 7.5 μg/dL. After adjustment for covariates, we found an inverse relationship between blood lead concentration and IQ score. Using a log-linear model, we found a 6.9 IQ point decrement [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2–9.4] associated with an increase in concurrent blood lead levels from 2.4 to 30 μg/dL. The estimated IQ point decrements associated with an increase in blood lead from 2.4 to 10 μg/dL, 10 to 20 μg/dL, and 20 to 30 μg/dL were 3.9 (95% CI, 2.4–5.3), 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2–2.6), and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7–1.5), respectively. For a given increase in blood lead, the lead-associated intellectual decrement for children with a maximal blood lead level < 7.5 μg/dL was significantly greater than that observed for those with a maximal blood lead level ≥7.5 μg/dL (p = 0.015). We conclude that environmental lead exposure in children who have maximal blood lead levels < 7.5 μg/dL is associated with intellectual deficits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension

            In both child and adult psychiatry, empirical evidence has now accrued to suggest that a single dimension is able to measure a person's liability to mental disorder, comorbidity among disorders, persistence of disorders over time, and severity of symptoms. This single dimension of general psychopathology has been termed "p," because it conceptually parallels a dimension already familiar to behavioral scientists and clinicians: the "g" factor of general intelligence. As the g dimension reflects low to high mental ability, the p dimension represents low to high psychopathology severity, with thought disorder at the extreme. The dimension of p unites all disorders. It influences present/absent status on hundreds of psychiatric symptoms, which modern nosological systems typically aggregate into dozens of distinct diagnoses, which in turn aggregate into three overarching domains, namely, the externalizing, internalizing, and psychotic experience domains, which finally aggregate into one dimension of psychopathology from low to high: p. Studies show that the higher a person scores on p, the worse that person fares on measures of family history of psychiatric illness, brain function, childhood developmental history, and adult life impairment. A dimension of p may help account for ubiquitous nonspecificity in psychiatry: multiple disorders share the same risk factors and biomarkers and often respond to the same therapies. Here, the authors summarize the history of the unidimensional idea, review modern research into p, demystify statistical models, articulate some implications of p for prevention and clinical practice, and outline a transdiagnostic research agenda. [AJP AT 175: Remembering Our Past As We Envision Our Future October 1910: A Study of Association in Insanity Grace Helen Kent and A.J. Rosanoff: "No sharp distinction can be drawn between mental health and mental disease; a large collection of material shows a gradual and not an abrupt transition from the normal state to pathological states."(Am J Psychiatry 1910; 67(2):317-390 )].
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                JAMA Psychiatry
                American Medical Association
                2168-622X
                2168-6238
                23 January 2019
                April 2019
                23 January 2019
                : 76
                : 4
                : 418-425
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [2 ]Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [3 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [4 ]King’s College London, Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
                [6 ]Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 26, 2018.
                Published Online: January 23, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4192
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Reuben A et al. JAMA Psychiatry.
                Corresponding Author: Aaron Reuben, MEM, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 2020 W Main St, Durham, NC 27708 ( aaron.reuben@ 123456duke.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Messrs Reuben and Schaefer contributed equally to this work. Messrs Reuben and Schaefer had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Reuben, Schaefer, Moffitt, Poulton, Caspi.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Reuben, Schaefer, Moffitt.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Reuben, Schaefer, Houts.
                Obtained funding: Moffitt, Poulton, Caspi.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Harrington, Ramrakha, Poulton.
                Supervision: Moffitt, Houts, Caspi.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support. The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit is supported by the New Zealand Health Research Council and the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment. This research received support from grant AG032282 from the National Institute on Aging and grant MR/P005918/1 from the UK Medical Research Council. Additional support was provided by the Jacobs Foundation and the Avielle Foundation. Mr Schaefer was supported by grant T32AG000139 from the National Institute on Aging and grant T32HD007376 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Mr Reuben was supported by grant F31ES029358 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: We thank the Dunedin study members, Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit staff, and study founder, Phil Silva, PhD.
                Article
                yoi180106
                10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4192
                6450277
                30673063
                637cab7a-1531-419e-b503-3dc0d7843c8a
                Copyright 2019 Reuben A et al. JAMA Psychiatry.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 25 July 2018
                : 25 October 2018
                : 26 October 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article