29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association between Household Air Pollution Exposure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outcomes in 13 Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d7611471e401"> <b>Rationale:</b> Forty percent of households worldwide burn biomass fuels for energy, which may be the most important contributor to household air pollution. </p><p id="d7611471e406"> <b>Objectives:</b> To examine the association between household air pollution exposure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes in 13 resource-poor settings. </p><p id="d7611471e411"> <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed data from 12,396 adult participants living in 13 resource-poor, population-based settings. Household air pollution exposure was defined as using biomass materials as the primary fuel source in the home. We used multivariable regressions to assess the relationship between household air pollution exposure and COPD outcomes, evaluated for interactions, and conducted sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings. </p><p id="d7611471e416"> <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Average age was 54.9 years (44.2–59.6 yr across settings), 48.5% were women (38.3–54.5%), prevalence of household air pollution exposure was 38% (0.5–99.6%), and 8.8% (1.7–15.5%) had COPD. Participants with household air pollution exposure were 41% more likely to have COPD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.68) than those without the exposure, and 13.5% (6.4–20.6%) of COPD prevalence may be caused by household air pollution exposure, compared with 12.4% caused by cigarette smoking. The association between household air pollution exposure and COPD was stronger in women (1.70; 1.24–2.32) than in men (1.21; 0.92–1.58). </p><p id="d7611471e421"> <b>Conclusions:</b> Household air pollution exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of COPD, particularly among women, and it is likely a leading population-attributable risk factor for COPD in resource-poor settings. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Solid Fuel Use for Household Cooking: Country and Regional Estimates for 1980–2010

          Background: Exposure to household air pollution from cooking with solid fuels in simple stoves is a major health risk. Modeling reliable estimates of solid fuel use is needed for monitoring trends and informing policy. Objectives: In order to revise the disease burden attributed to household air pollution for the Global Burden of Disease 2010 project and for international reporting purposes, we estimated annual trends in the world population using solid fuels. Methods: We developed a multilevel model based on national survey data on primary cooking fuel. Results: The proportion of households relying mainly on solid fuels for cooking has decreased from 62% (95% CI: 58, 66%) to 41% (95% CI: 37, 44%) between 1980 and 2010. Yet because of population growth, the actual number of persons exposed has remained stable at around 2.8 billion during three decades. Solid fuel use is most prevalent in Africa and Southeast Asia where > 60% of households cook with solid fuels. In other regions, primary solid fuel use ranges from 46% in the Western Pacific, to 35% in the Eastern Mediterranean and < 20% in the Americas and Europe. Conclusion: Multilevel modeling is a suitable technique for deriving reliable solid-fuel use estimates. Worldwide, the proportion of households cooking mainly with solid fuels is decreasing. The absolute number of persons using solid fuels, however, has remained steady globally and is increasing in some regions. Surveys require enhancement to better capture the health implications of new technologies and multiple fuel use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COPD and chronic bronchitis risk of indoor air pollution from solid fuel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            Over half the world is exposed daily to the smoke from combustion of solid fuels. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main contributors to the global burden of disease and can be caused by biomass smoke exposure. However, studies of biomass exposure and COPD show a wide range of effect sizes. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the impact of biomass smoke on the development of COPD and define reasons for differences in the reported effect sizes. A systematic review was conducted of studies with sufficient statistical power to calculate the health risk of COPD from the use of solid fuel, which followed standardised criteria for the diagnosis of COPD and which dealt with confounding factors. The results were pooled by fuel type and country to produce summary estimates using a random effects model. Publication bias was also estimated. There were positive associations between the use of solid fuels and COPD (OR=2.80, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.0) and chronic bronchitis (OR=2.32, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.80). Pooled estimates for different types of fuel show that exposure to wood smoke while performing domestic work presents a greater risk of development of COPD and chronic bronchitis than other fuels. Despite heterogeneity across the selected studies, exposure to solid fuel smoke is consistently associated with COPD and chronic bronchitis. Efforts should be made to reduce exposure to solid fuel by using either cleaner fuel or relatively cleaner technology while performing domestic work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Respiratory disease associated with solid biomass fuel exposure in rural women and children: systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Numerous studies with varying associations between domestic use of solid biomass fuels (wood, dung, crop residue, charcoal) and respiratory diseases have been reported. To present the current data systematically associating use of biomass fuels with respiratory outcomes in rural women and children. Systematic searches were conducted in 13 electronic databases. Data were abstracted from original articles that satisfied selection criteria for meta-analyses. Publication bias and heterogeneity of samples were tested. Studies with common diagnoses were analysed using random-effect models. A total of 2717 studies were identified. Fifty-one studies were selected for data extraction and 25 studies were suitable for meta-analysis. The overall pooled ORs indicate significant associations with acute respiratory infection in children (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.94 to 6.43), chronic bronchitis in women (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.93). In contrast, no significant association with asthma in children or women was noted. Biomass fuel exposure is associated with diverse respiratory diseases in rural populations. Concerted efforts in improving stove design and lowering exposure to smoke emission may reduce respiratory disease associated with biomass fuel exposure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                American Thoracic Society
                1073-449X
                1535-4970
                March 2018
                March 2018
                : 197
                : 5
                : 611-620
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care and
                [2 ]Center for Global Non-Communicable Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
                [3 ]Centre for Control of Chronic Diseases, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [4 ]Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [5 ]CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases and
                [6 ]Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
                [7 ]School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]Makerere Lung Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
                [9 ]Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom; and
                [10 ]University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Harlingen, the Netherlands
                Article
                10.1164/rccm.201709-1861OC
                6005243
                29323928
                63dea8a7-d754-40b2-8bb1-3ab3a80dc204
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article