Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Strategic Resource Allocation in the Human Brain Supports Cognitive Coordination of Object and Spatial Working Memory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ability to integrate different types of information (e.g., object identity and spatial orientation) and maintain or manipulate them concurrently in working memory (WM) facilitates the flow of ongoing tasks and is essential for normal human cognition. Research shows that object and spatial information is maintained and manipulated in WM via separate pathways in the brain (object/ventral versus spatial/dorsal). How does the human brain coordinate the activity of different specialized systems to conjoin different types of information? Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate conjunction- versus single-task manipulation of object (compute average color blend) and spatial (compute intermediate angle) information in WM. Object WM was associated with ventral (inferior frontal gyrus, occipital cortex), and spatial WM with dorsal (parietal cortex, superior frontal, and temporal sulci) regions. Conjoined object/spatial WM resulted in intermediate activity in these specialized areas, but greater activity in different prefrontal and parietal areas. Unique to our study, we found lower temporo-occipital activity and greater deactivation in temporal and medial prefrontal cortices for conjunction- versus single-tasks. Using structural equation modeling, we derived a conjunction-task connectivity model that comprises a frontoparietal network with a bidirectional DLPFC-VLPFC connection, and a direct parietal-extrastriate pathway. We suggest that these activation/deactivation patterns reflect efficient resource allocation throughout the brain and propose a new extended version of the biased competition model of WM. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A theory of visual attention.

          A unified theory of visual recognition and attentional selection is developed by integrating the biased-choice model for single-stimulus recognition (Luce, 1963; Shepard, 1957) with a choice model for selection from multielement displays (Bundesen, Pedersen, & Larsen, 1984) in a race model framework. Mathematically, the theory is tractable, and it specifies the computations necessary for selection. The theory is applied to extant findings from a broad range of experimental paradigms. The findings include effects of object integrality in selective report, number and spatial position of targets in divided-attention paradigms, selection criterion and number of distracters in focused-attention paradigms, delay of selection cue in partial report, and consistent practice in search. On the whole, the quantitative fits are encouraging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

            B R Postle (2006)
            Cognitive neuroscience research on working memory has been largely motivated by a standard model that arose from the melding of psychological theory with neuroscience data. Among the tenets of this standard model are that working memory functions arise from the operation of specialized systems that act as buffers for the storage and manipulation of information, and that frontal cortex (particularly prefrontal cortex) is a critical neural substrate for these specialized systems. However, the standard model has been a victim of its own success, and can no longer accommodate many of the empirical findings of studies that it has motivated. An alternative is proposed: Working memory functions arise through the coordinated recruitment, via attention, of brain systems that have evolved to accomplish sensory-, representation-, and action-related functions. Evidence from behavioral, neuropsychological, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging studies, from monkeys and humans, is considered, as is the question of how to interpret delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory.

              In recent years, theoretical perspectives on posterior parietal function have evolved beyond the traditional visuospatial processing models to include more diverse cognitive operations, such as long-term and working memory. However, definitive neuropsychological evidence supporting the superior parietal lobule's purported role in working memory has been lacking. Here, we studied human brain lesion patients to determine whether the superior parietal lobule is indeed necessary for working memory. We assessed a wide range of memory functions in three participant groups: superior parietal lesions (n = 19), lesions not involving superior parietal cortex (n = 146), and no brain lesions (n = 55). Superior parietal damage was reliably associated with deficits on tests involving the manipulation and rearrangement of information in working memory, but not on working memory tests requiring only rehearsal and retrieval processes, nor on tests of long-term memory. These results indicate that superior parietal cortex is critically important for the manipulation of information in working memory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Hum Brain Mapp
                hbm
                Human Brain Mapping
                Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company (Hoboken )
                1065-9471
                1097-0193
                August 2011
                16 August 2010
                : 32
                : 8
                : 1330-1348
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleSchool of Psychology, Bangor University Bangor, United Kingdom
                [2 ]simpleJohann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
                Author notes
                *Correspondence to: Margaret C. Jackson, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2AS, United Kingdom. E-mail: m.jackson@ 123456bangor.ac.uk

                Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

                Contract grant sponsor: Wellcome Trust Grant; Contract grant number: 077185/Z/05/Z.

                Article
                10.1002/hbm.21112
                3326378
                20715083
                63ef8a35-38c2-485d-857c-af6ccd358d30
                Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 11 August 2009
                : 27 April 2010
                : 18 May 2010
                Categories
                Research Articles

                Neurology
                fmri,conjunction,visuospatial,working memory,sem
                Neurology
                fmri, conjunction, visuospatial, working memory, sem

                Comments

                Comment on this article