7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Impact of decentralisation of antiretroviral therapy services on HIV testing and care at a population level in Agago District in rural Northern Uganda: results from the Lablite population surveys

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Guideline on When to Start Antiretroviral Therapy and On Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            90-90-90 An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic

            (2014)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Better Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes at Primary Healthcare Facilities: An Evaluation of Three Tiers of ART Services in Four South African Provinces

              Background There are conflicting reports of antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectiveness comparisons between primary healthcare (PHC) facilities and hospitals in low-income settings. This comparison has not been evaluated on a broad scale in South Africa. Methodology/Principal Findings A retrospective cohort study was conducted including ART-naïve adults from 59 facilities in four provinces in South Africa, enrolled between 2004 and 2007. Kaplan-Meier estimates, competing-risks Cox regression, generalised estimating equation population-averaged models and logistic regression were used to compare death, loss to follow-up (LTFU) and virological suppression (VS) between PHC, district and regional hospitals. 29 203 adults from 47 PHC facilities, nine district hospitals and three regional hospitals were included. Patients at PHC facilities had more advanced WHO stage disease when starting ART. Retention in care was 80.1% (95% CI: 79.3%–80.8%), 71.5% (95% CI: 69.1%–73.8%) and 68.7% (95% CI: 67.0%–69.7%) at PHC, district and regional hospitals respectively, after 24 months of treatment (P<0.0001). In adjusted regression analyses, LTFU was independently increased at regional hospitals (aHR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.94−2.47) and mortality was independently elevated at district hospitals (aHR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.30−1.99) compared to PHC facilities after 12 months of ART. District and regional hospital patients had independently reduced probabilities of VS, aOR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.59−0.97) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56−0.75) respectively compared to PHC facilities over 24 months of treatment. Conclusions/Significance ART outcomes were superior at PHC facilities, despite PHC patients having more advanced clinical stage disease when starting ART, suggesting that ART can be adequately provided at this level and supporting the South African government's call for rapid up-scaling of ART at the primary level of care. Further prospective research is required to determine the degree to which outcome differences are attributable to either facility level characteristics or patient co-morbidity at hospital level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Health
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1876-3413
                1876-3405
                March 2017
                March 01 2017
                March 10 2017
                March 2017
                March 01 2017
                March 10 2017
                : 9
                : 2
                : 91-99
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Research, Joint Clinical Research Centre, P.O. Box 10005, Kampala, Uganda
                [2 ] Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
                [3 ] Department of Statistics, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute, P.O. Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda
                [4 ] Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
                [5 ] Department of Research, Dignitas International, P.O. Box 1071, Zomba, Malawi
                [6 ] Clinical Research Centre, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167 Harare, Zimbabwe
                [7 ] Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6JB, UK
                [8 ] Department of Research, Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda
                [9 ] Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
                [10 ] Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
                [11 ] School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
                [12 ] Faculty of Paediatrics, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
                [13 ] Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, WC2B 6NH, UK
                [14 ] Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
                Article
                10.1093/inthealth/ihx006
                64608fd0-c5d3-4a7a-a32f-06c2ff1a4093
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article