2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Laparoscopic abdominal surgery has become a mainstay of modern surgical practice. Postoperative analgesia is an integral component of recovery following laparoscopic abdominal surgery and may be improved by regional anesthesia or intravenous lidocaine infusion. There is inconsistent evidence supporting the use of interfascial plane blocks, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery as evidenced by variable patterns of local anesthetic spread and conflicting results from studies comparing TAP blocks to local anesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites and multimodal analgesia. Quadratus lumborum (QL) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks may provide greater areas of somatic analgesia as well as visceral analgesia, which may translate to more significant clinical benefits. Aside from the locations of the surgical incisions, it is unclear what other factors should be considered when choosing one regional technique over another or deciding to infuse lidocaine intravenously. We reviewed the current literature in attempt to clarify the roles of various regional anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery and present one possible approach to evaluating postoperative pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Erector Spinae Plane Block

          Thoracic neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition that is often poorly responsive to oral and topical pharmacotherapy. The benefit of interventional nerve block procedures is unclear due to a paucity of evidence and the invasiveness of the described techniques. In this report, we describe a novel interfascial plane block, the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and its successful application in 2 cases of severe neuropathic pain (the first resulting from metastatic disease of the ribs, and the second from malunion of multiple rib fractures). In both cases, the ESP block also produced an extensive multidermatomal sensory block. Anatomical and radiological investigation in fresh cadavers indicates that its likely site of action is at the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves. The ESP block holds promise as a simple and safe technique for thoracic analgesia in both chronic neuropathic pain as well as acute postsurgical or posttraumatic pain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.

            Quality of recovery (QoR) after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. The aim was to develop a short-form postoperative QoR score, and test its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical acceptability and feasibility. Based on extensive clinical and research experience with the 40-item QoR-40, the strongest psychometrically performing items from each of the five dimensions of the QoR-40 were selected to create a short-form version, the QoR-15. This was then evaluated in 127 adult patients after general anesthesia and surgery. There was good convergent validity between the QoR-15 and a global QoR visual analog scale (r = 0.68, P < 0.0005). Construct validity was supported by a negative correlation with duration of surgery (r = -0.49, P < 0.0005), time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (r = -0.41, P < 0.0005), and duration of hospital stay (r = -0.53, P < 0.0005). There was also excellent internal consistency (0.85), split-half reliability (0.78), and test-retest reliability (ri = 0.99), all P < 0.0005. Responsiveness was excellent with an effect size of 1.35 and a standardized response mean of 1.04. The mean ± SD time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.4 ± 0.8 min. The QoR-15 provides a valid, extensive, and yet efficient evaluation of postoperative QoR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle.

              A N Rafi (2001)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Local Reg Anesth
                Local Reg Anesth
                lra
                lra
                Local and Regional Anesthesia
                Dove
                1178-7112
                23 October 2020
                2020
                : 13
                : 159-169
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center , Sacramento, CA, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: James Harvey JonesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center , 4150 V Street, PSSB Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA95817, USATel +1 (916) 734-5031Fax +1 (916) 734-7980 Email jamesjns137@gmail.com
                Article
                272694
                10.2147/LRA.S272694
                7591028
                33122942
                64de5fd5-2bfc-4fe3-9798-73a38394a879
                © 2020 Jones and Aldwinckle.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 18 July 2020
                : 23 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, References: 91, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Not applicable/no funding;
                Not applicable/no funding was received.
                Categories
                Review

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                transversus abdominis plane block,interfascial plane block,laparoscopic abdominal surgery,pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article