1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Stress and Well-Being of Japanese Employees Using Wearable Devices for Sleep Monitoring Combined With Ecological Momentary Assessment: Pilot Observational Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Poor sleep quality can elevate stress levels and diminish overall well-being. Japanese individuals often experience sleep deprivation, and workers have high levels of stress. Nevertheless, research examining the connection between objective sleep assessments and stress levels, as well as overall well-being, among Japanese workers is lacking.

          Objective

          This study aims to investigate the correlation between physiological data, including sleep duration and heart rate variability (HRV), objectively measured through wearable devices, and 3 states (sleepiness, mood, and energy) assessed through ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and use of rating scales for stress and well-being.

          Methods

          A total of 40 office workers (female, 20/40, 50%; mean age 40.4 years, SD 11.8 years) participated in the study. Participants were asked to wear a wearable wristband device for 8 consecutive weeks. EMA regarding sleepiness, mood, and energy levels was conducted via email messages sent by participants 4 times daily, with each session spaced 3 hours apart. This assessment occurred on 8 designated days within the 8-week timeframe. Participants’ stress levels and perception of well-being were assessed using respective self-rating questionnaires. Subsequently, participants were categorized into quartiles based on their stress and well-being scores, and the sleep patterns and HRV indices recorded by the Fitbit Inspire 2 were compared among these groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between the quartiles, with adjustments made for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. Furthermore, EMA results and the sleep and HRV indices were subjected to multilevel analysis for a comprehensive evaluation.

          Results

          The EMA achieved a total response rate of 87.3%, while the Fitbit Inspire 2 wear rate reached 88.0%. When participants were grouped based on quartiles of well-being and stress-related scores, significant differences emerged. Specifically, individuals in the lowest stress quartile or highest subjective satisfaction quartile retired to bed earlier ( P<.001 and P=.01, respectively), whereas those in the highest stress quartile exhibited greater variation in the midpoint of sleep ( P<.001). A multilevel analysis unveiled notable relationships: intraindividual variability analysis indicated that higher energy levels were associated with lower deviation of heart rate during sleep on the preceding day (β=–.12, P<.001), and decreased sleepiness was observed on days following longer sleep durations (β=–.10, P<.001). Furthermore, interindividual variability analysis revealed that individuals with earlier midpoints of sleep tended to exhibit higher energy levels (β=–.26, P=.04).

          Conclusions

          Increased sleep variabilities, characterized by unstable bedtime or midpoint of sleep, were correlated with elevated stress levels and diminished well-being. Conversely, improved sleep indices (eg, lower heart rate during sleep and earlier average bedtime) were associated with heightened daytime energy levels. Further research with a larger sample size using these methodologies, particularly focusing on specific phenomena such as social jet lag, has the potential to yield valuable insights.

          Trial Registration

          UMIN-CTR UMIN000046858; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053392

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

          Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

            The development and use of a new scale, the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), is described. This is a simple, self-administered questionnaire which is shown to provide a measurement of the subject's general level of daytime sleepiness. One hundred and eighty adults answered the ESS, including 30 normal men and women as controls and 150 patients with a range of sleep disorders. They rated the chances that they would doze off or fall asleep when in eight different situations commonly encountered in daily life. Total ESS scores significantly distinguished normal subjects from patients in various diagnostic groups including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. ESS scores were significantly correlated with sleep latency measured during the multiple sleep latency test and during overnight polysomnography. In patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome ESS scores were significantly correlated with the respiratory disturbance index and the minimum SaO2 recorded overnight. ESS scores of patients who simply snored did not differ from controls.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Form Res
                JMIR Form Res
                JFR
                JMIR Formative Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-326X
                2024
                2 May 2024
                : 8
                : e49396
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Hills Joint Research Laboratory for Future Preventive Medicine and Wellness Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
                [2 ] Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
                [3 ] Department of Neuropsychiatry Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
                [4 ] Graduate School of Health Management Keio University Kanagawa Japan
                [5 ] Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Human Relations Shigakukan University Kagoshima Japan
                [6 ] Center for Preventice Medicine Keio University Hospital Tokyo Japan
                [7 ] Department of Health Promotion National Institute of Public Health Saitama Japan
                [8 ] Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
                [9 ] TechDoctor, Inc. Tokyo Japan
                [10 ] Department of Psychiatry The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health New York, NY United States
                [11 ] Department of Psychiatry Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead, NY United States
                [12 ] Department of Molecular Medicine Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead, NY United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Taishiro Kishimoto tkishimoto@ 123456keio.jp
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-383X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5642-2841
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0889-8392
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-9508
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-8418
                https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9175-427X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-9107
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-1466
                https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5675-6017
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2752-5440
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1385-8404
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-8648
                Article
                v8i1e49396
                10.2196/49396
                11099815
                38696237
                657fea53-c177-404d-a35b-a5abd9962145
                ©Shotaro Kinoshita, Sayaka Hanashiro, Shiori Tsutsumi, Kiko Shiga, Momoko Kitazawa, Yasuyo Wada, Jun Inaishi, Kazuhiro Kashiwagi, Toshikazu Fukami, Yasumasa Mashimo, Kazumichi Minato, Taishiro Kishimoto. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 02.05.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 27 May 2023
                : 29 June 2023
                : 1 October 2023
                : 21 March 2024
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                wearable device,sleep feedback,well-being,stress,ecological momentary assessment,feasibility study

                Comments

                Comment on this article