There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Introduction
The medical literature shows that the most important prognosis factor in nosocomial
pneumonia is the correct empirical antimicrobial therapy. Recently the microorganisms
have been becoming more resistant to the usual antibiotics and there are many reports
of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) only susceptible to Polimixyn b (PB). The ATS guideline
does not suggest the use of PB as an empirical therapy, while the Brazilian Sepsis
Guideline (BG) allows the use of this antibiotic in special circumstances. The aim
of this study was to compare the efficacy of both guidelines, based on the microbiological
data.
Methods
This is a retrospective study with 93 cases of nosocomial pneumonia diagnosed according
to the ATS criteria, managed in our ICU from 1 February 2005 to 16 September 2006.
We analyzed the efficacy of both guidelines, using them during all the study period
or stratifying the patients into two groups according to the research median period
(24 November 2005).
Results
There were 67 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and 26 cases of non-VAP.
The overall result shows that the ATS would be effective in 76% (CI 67–85%) and the
BG in 87.9% (CI 81–94.7%) of the cases. This difference was statistically significant
(P = 0.035). The most prevalent bacteria were Acinetobacter sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
From February to August 2005 there were a burden of multiresistant (MR) GNB, only
susceptible to PB. Using the ATS or the BG in this period, the guidelines would be
effective in 64% (CI 51–77%) and 84.4% (CI 74.8–94%) respectively (P = 0.017). In
the second half of the study we controlled the MR GNB, and the efficacy of both guidelines
were similar between ATS and BG (97% vs 93.9%; P = 1).
Conclusion
Our data show that the more restrictive ATS guideline can significantly lead to a
wrong empirical therapy in MR GNB high-prevalence situations. The use of the BG can
lead to a better empirical treatment in this situation. This information enhances
the need for ICU flora knowledge, which are seasonal, so there is no 'all time and
place perfect guideline', although the BG was a better option in our ICU than the
ATS guideline.