5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scientific Societies Integrating Gender and Ethnoracial Diversity Efforts: A First Meeting Report from Amplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+)

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Professional STEM societies have been identified as an important lever to address STEM diversity, equity, and inclusion. In this Perspectives article, we chronicle the highlights of the first Amplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+) convening held in September 2021. Here, we introduce the three-part ACCESS+ approach using a model that entails (i) completion of a DEI self-assessment known as the equity environmental scanning tool, (ii) guided action plan development and iteration, and (iii) sustained participation in a community of practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice

            Background In the experience of health professionals, it appears that interacting with peers in the workplace fosters learning and information sharing. Informal groups and networks present good opportunities for information exchange. Communities of practice (CoPs), which have been described by Wenger and others as a type of informal learning organization, have received increasing attention in the health care sector; however, the lack of uniform operating definitions of CoPs has resulted in considerable variation in the structure and function of these groups, making it difficult to evaluate their effectiveness. Objective To critique the evolution of the CoP concept as based on the germinal work by Wenger and colleagues published between 1991 and 2002. Discussion CoP was originally developed to provide a template for examining the learning that happens among practitioners in a social environment, but over the years there have been important divergences in the focus of the concept. Lave and Wenger's earliest publication (1991) centred on the interactions between novices and experts, and the process by which newcomers create a professional identity. In the 1998 book, the focus had shifted to personal growth and the trajectory of individuals' participation within a group (i.e., peripheral versus core participation). The focus then changed again in 2002 when CoP was applied as a managerial tool for improving an organization's competitiveness. Summary The different interpretations of CoP make it challenging to apply the concept or to take full advantage of the benefits that CoP groups may offer. The tension between satisfying individuals' needs for personal growth and empowerment versus an organization's bottom line is perhaps the most contentious of the issues that make CoPs difficult to cultivate. Since CoP is still an evolving concept, we recommend focusing on optimizing specific characteristics of the concept, such as support for members interacting with each other, sharing knowledge, and building a sense of belonging within networks/teams/groups. Interventions that facilitate relationship building among members and that promote knowledge exchange may be useful for optimizing the function of these groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              "You Would Not Believe What I Have to Go Through to Prove My Intellectual Value!" Stereotype Management Among Academically Successful Black Mathematics and Engineering Students

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Microbiol Biol Educ
                J Microbiol Biol Educ
                jmbe
                Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                1935-7877
                1935-7885
                21 February 2022
                April 2022
                : 23
                : 1
                : e00340-21
                Affiliations
                [a ] Amplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success (ACCESS+), Women in Engineering ProActive Network, Washington, DC, USA
                [b ] Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
                [c ] Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
                [d ] ADVANCE Resource and Coordination Network (ARC Network), Women in Engineering ProActive Network, Washington, DC, USA
                [e ] School of Engineering and Innovation, Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
                [f ] Department of Psychology, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
                [g ] Department of Biology, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
                Author notes

                Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo and Andrea Lucy Putwen contributed equally to this article. Author order was determined alphabetically.

                The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Article
                jmbe00340-21 jmbe.00340-21
                10.1128/jmbe.00340-21
                8941930
                6689d087-303c-41b1-bb7e-acd15cd0ef8f
                Copyright © 2022 Campbell-Montalvo et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 2 February 2022
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 1, Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 7, Words: 5475
                Categories
                Perspective
                Custom metadata
                April 2022

                diversity,equity,inclusion,professional stem societies,action planning,community of practice,equity environmental scanning tool self-assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article