9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measures and Metrics for Feasibility of Proof-of-Concept Studies With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Rapid Point-of-Care Technologies : The Evidence and the Framework

      review-article
      , MD, MPH, PhD *† , , PhD , , BSc , , BSc , , MSc (PH) , , BSc, MSc , , MD, MPH, CCFP, FRCPC , , PhD §
      Point of Care
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      metrics, measures, framework, feasibility, point-of-care

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Pilot (feasibility) studies form a vast majority of diagnostic studies with point-of-care technologies but often lack use of clear measures/metrics and a consistent framework for reporting and evaluation. To fill this gap, we systematically reviewed data to ( a) catalog feasibility measures/metrics and ( b) propose a framework.

          Methods

          For the period January 2000 to March 2014, 2 reviewers searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus), retrieved 1441 citations, and abstracted data from 81 studies. We observed 2 major categories of measures, that is, implementation centered and patient centered, and 4 subcategories of measures, that is, feasibility, acceptability, preference, and patient experience. We defined and delineated metrics and measures for a feasibility framework. We documented impact measures for a comparison.

          Findings

          We observed heterogeneity in reporting of metrics as well as misclassification and misuse of metrics within measures. Although we observed poorly defined measures and metrics for feasibility, preference, and patient experience, in contrast, acceptability measure was the best defined. For example, within feasibility, metrics such as consent, completion, new infection, linkage rates, and turnaround times were misclassified and reported. Similarly, patient experience was variously reported as test convenience, comfort, pain, and/or satisfaction. In contrast, within impact measures, all the metrics were well documented, thus serving as a good baseline comparator. With our framework, we classified, delineated, and defined quantitative measures and metrics for feasibility.

          Conclusions

          Our framework, with its defined measures/metrics, could reduce misclassification and improve the overall quality of reporting for monitoring and evaluation of rapid point-of-care technology strategies and their context-driven optimization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.

          The aim of diagnostic point-of-care testing is to minimise the time to obtain a test result, thereby allowing clinicians and patients to make a quick clinical decision. Because point-of-care tests are used in resource-limited settings, the benefits need to outweigh the costs. To optimise point-of-care testing in resource-limited settings, diagnostic tests need rigorous assessments focused on relevant clinical outcomes and operational costs, which differ from assessments of conventional diagnostic tests. We reviewed published studies on point-of-care testing in resource-limited settings, and found no clearly defined metric for the clinical usefulness of point-of-care testing. Therefore, we propose a framework for the assessment of point-of-care tests, and suggest and define the term test efficacy to describe the ability of a diagnostic test to support a clinical decision within its operational context. We also propose revised criteria for an ideal diagnostic point-of-care test in resource-limited settings. Through systematic assessments, comparisons between centralised testing and novel point-of-care technologies can be more formalised, and health officials can better establish which point-of-care technologies represent valuable additions to their clinical programmes. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High HIV testing uptake and linkage to care in a novel program of home-based HIV counseling and testing with facilitated referral in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

            For antiretroviral therapy (ART) to have a population-level HIV prevention impact, high levels of HIV testing and effective linkages to HIV care among HIV-infected persons are required. We piloted home-based counseling and testing (HBCT) with point-of-care CD4 count testing and follow-up visits to facilitate linkage of HIV-infected persons to local HIV clinics and uptake of ART in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Lay counselor follow-up visits at months one, three and six evaluated the primary outcome of linkage to care. Plasma viral load was measured at baseline and month six. 671 adults were tested for HIV (91% coverage) and 201 (30%) were HIV-infected, of which 73 (36%) were new diagnoses. By month three, 90% of HIV-infected persons not on ART at baseline had visited an HIV clinic and 80% of those eligible for ART at baseline by South African guidelines (CD4≤200 cells/μL at the time of the study) had initiated ART. Among HIV-infected participants who were eligible for ART at baseline, mean viral load decreased by 3.23 log10 copies/mL (p<0.001) and the proportion with viral load suppression increased from 20% to 80% between baseline and month six. In this pilot of HBCT and linkages to care in KwaZulu-Natal, 91% of adults were tested for HIV. Linkage to care was ∼90% both among newly-identified HIV-infected persons as well as known HIVinfected persons who were not engaged in care. Among those eligible for ART, a high proportion initiated ART and achieved viral suppression, indicating high adherence and reduced infectiousness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Point Care
                Point Care
                POC
                Point of Care
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1533-029X
                1533-0303
                December 2017
                14 November 2017
                : 16
                : 4
                : 141-150
                Affiliations
                [1]From the *Department of Medicine, McGill University; †Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec; ‡Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada; and §Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
                Author notes
                Reprints: Nitika Pant Pai, MD, MPH, PhD, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine McGill University and Health Centre, 5252 Boul de Maisonneuve, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4A 3S5. E-mail: nitika.pai@ 123456mcgill.ca .
                Article
                POC50102 00001
                10.1097/POC.0000000000000147
                5737458
                29333105
                66b76f38-cf39-4e08-b57c-3ec373aa9b68
                Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 0
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                metrics,measures,framework,feasibility,point-of-care
                metrics, measures, framework, feasibility, point-of-care

                Comments

                Comment on this article