5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EML4‐ALK biology and drug resistance in non‐small cell lung cancer: a new phase of discoveries

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) can be driven to oncogenic activity by different types of mutational events such as point‐mutations, for example F1174L in neuroblastoma, and gene fusions, for example with echinoderm microtubule‐associated protein‐like 4 (EML4) in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EML4‐ALK variants result from different breakpoints, generating fusions of different sizes and properties. The most common variants (Variant 1 and Variant 3) form cellular compartments with distinct physical properties. The presence of a partial, probably misfolded beta‐propeller domain in variant 1 confers solid‐like properties to the compartments it forms, greater dependence on Hsp90 for protein stability and higher cell sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These differences translate to the clinic because variant 3, on average, worsens patient prognosis and increases metastatic risk. Latest generation ALK‐TKIs are beneficial for most patients with EML4‐ALK fusions. However, resistance to ALK inhibitors can occur via point‐mutations within the kinase domain of the EML4‐ALK fusion, for example G1202R, reducing inhibitor effectiveness. Here, we discuss the biology of EML4‐ALK variants, their impact on treatment response, ALK‐TKI drug resistance mechanisms and potential combination therapies.

          Abstract

          Schematic overview of EML4‐ALK resistance mechanisms. EML4‐ALK variants generate proteins of different sizes that form cellular compartments. This drives cancer signalling and promotes cancer cell survival pathways that can be blocked with ALK‐TKIs. Resistance pathways can be on‐target and diminish the efficacy of ALK‐TKIs; or off‐target, and bypass the requirement for ALK activity altogether.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Cancer statistics, 2022

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes. Incidence data (through 2018) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2019) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2022, 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States, including approximately 350 deaths per day from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death. Incidence during 2014 through 2018 continued a slow increase for female breast cancer (by 0.5% annually) and remained stable for prostate cancer, despite a 4% to 6% annual increase for advanced disease since 2011. Consequently, the proportion of prostate cancer diagnosed at a distant stage increased from 3.9% to 8.2% over the past decade. In contrast, lung cancer incidence continued to decline steeply for advanced disease while rates for localized-stage increased suddenly by 4.5% annually, contributing to gains both in the proportion of localized-stage diagnoses (from 17% in 2004 to 28% in 2018) and 3-year relative survival (from 21% to 31%). Mortality patterns reflect incidence trends, with declines accelerating for lung cancer, slowing for breast cancer, and stabilizing for prostate cancer. In summary, progress has stagnated for breast and prostate cancers but strengthened for lung cancer, coinciding with changes in medical practice related to cancer screening and/or treatment. More targeted cancer control interventions and investment in improved early detection and treatment would facilitate reductions in cancer mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer.

            Despite the success of tyrosine kinase-based cancer therapeutics, for most solid tumors the tyrosine kinases that drive disease remain unknown, limiting our ability to identify drug targets and predict response. Here we present the first large-scale survey of tyrosine kinase activity in lung cancer. Using a phosphoproteomic approach, we characterize tyrosine kinase signaling across 41 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and over 150 NSCLC tumors. Profiles of phosphotyrosine signaling are generated and analyzed to identify known oncogenic kinases such as EGFR and c-Met as well as novel ALK and ROS fusion proteins. Other activated tyrosine kinases such as PDGFRalpha and DDR1 not previously implicated in the genesis of NSCLC are also identified. By focusing on activated cell circuitry, the approach outlined here provides insight into cancer biology not available at the chromosomal and transcriptional levels and can be applied broadly across all human cancers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

              Background Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. Methods In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. Results During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib). Conclusions As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                r.w.bayliss@leeds.ac.uk
                Journal
                Mol Oncol
                Mol Oncol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1878-0261
                MOL2
                Molecular Oncology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1574-7891
                1878-0261
                15 May 2023
                June 2023
                : 17
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/mol2.v17.6 )
                : 950-963
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology University of Leeds UK
                [ 2 ] Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology University of Leeds UK
                [ 3 ] Leeds Cancer Center, St.James' University Hospital Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                R. Bayliss, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

                E‐mail: r.w.bayliss@ 123456leeds.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-6014
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-0125
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-2773
                Article
                MOL213446 MOLONC-23-0158.R1
                10.1002/1878-0261.13446
                10257413
                37149843
                673e65d3-8e23-40f4-97aa-9d0930ebdffe
                © 2023 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 April 2023
                : 18 February 2023
                : 05 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 963, Words: 10798
                Funding
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK , doi 10.13039/501100000289;
                Award ID: C24461/A23302
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust , doi 10.13039/100010269;
                Categories
                Lung Cancer
                Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
                Cancer Therapy Resistance
                Drug Resistance
                Cancer Therapies
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.9 mode:remove_FC converted:10.06.2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer,drug resistance,nsclc,signalling,tyrosine kinase inhibitors
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer, drug resistance, nsclc, signalling, tyrosine kinase inhibitors

                Comments

                Comment on this article