2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endoscopic full-thickness resection with an over-the-scope clip device (FTRD) of colon polyp with carcinoma infiltration

      letter
      1 , , 2
      Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
      Termedia Publishing House

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A 62-year-old male patient was referred to our endoscopic centre for qualification for an endoscopic re-reseciton in 2016. The reason was suspicion of infiltrating cancer in the margins of ascending colon polyp in histopathology. The polyp had 10 mm diameter and was removed during the first colonoscopy in the other endoscopic centre. Before the control examination, the patient had additional imaging examinations, which showed the T1 stage of disease. Our endoscopic examination showed an incomplete resected polyp in the ascending colon (Figure 1 A). After marking the margins of the lesion with a tattoo, an endoscopic full-thickness resection was planned. The procedure was performed in anaesthetic analgosedation using a PCF-H190D colonoscope with Olympus Evis Exera III CV/CLV-190 tower. After the introduction of the colonoscope and localisation of the lesion, the margin was determined using the included marking probe (APC ERBE 20 W) (Figure 1 B). After mount the FTRD System® (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany), a resection of the lesion was performed (Figures 1 C–E). After removing the FTRD System, the resection site was revised. The treatment went without complications. During the subsequent days of hospitalisation, no gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation symptoms were observed. The tightness of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in the control colonoscopy was completed, and the patient was discharged home. Because of the uncertain result of one of the margins of the obtained material, a planned right-sided hemicolectomy was performed. In the histopathological examination of the postoperative material, an inflammatory polyp with granulation was found at the location of the OTSC clip, without the presence of neoplastic infiltration. No metastases were found in the seventeen lymph nodes collected intra-operatively. In the follow-up colonoscopy, performed 6 months after the procedure, relapse was not seen in the remaining part of the colon. Surgical anastomosis was normal. Figure 1 A – Non-complete resection of ascending colon polyp with high-grade dysplasia, with a focal presence of cancer, B – marking the margins of the lesion, C – the lesion site with over-the-scope clip after the full-thickness resection (FTRD, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany), D – the lesion site with overthe- scope clip after the full-thickness resection (FTRD, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany), E – FTRD System® (full thickness resection device, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany), www.ovesco.com Advanced endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD) are used in the case of extensive superficial wall layers of the gastrointestinal tract [1, 2]. The above-mentioned endoscopic techniques may be difficult to perform due to high risk of perforation, and they are sometimes insufficient to achieve curative resection (R0) in the case of non-lifting signs, subepithelial tumours (SETs), advanced local fibrosis, tumours with deep infiltration, incomplete resection of the intestinal adenomas and post-resection recurrences, as well as adenomas with problematic localisation like the diverticulum or appendix [3–5]. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with an OTSC device (full-thickness resection device – FTRD) can be alternative method for EMR, ESD and classical surgical procedure in selected cases [3]. In the present case FTRD was an effective and safe method in deep resection of lesions, even with carcinoma infiltration. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

          This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system 1 2 was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

            1  ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP) as the preferred technique for removal of diminutive polyps (size ≤ 5 mm). This technique has high rates of complete resection, adequate tissue sampling for histology, and low complication rates. (High quality evidence, strong recommendation.)2 ESGE suggests CSP for sessile polyps 6 - 9 mm in size because of its superior safety profile, although evidence comparing efficacy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is lacking. (Moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation.)3 ESGE suggests HSP (with or without submucosal injection) for removal of sessile polyps 10 - 19 mm in size. In most cases deep thermal injury is a potential risk and thus submucosal injection prior to HSP should be considered. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.)4 ESGE recommends HSP for pedunculated polyps. To prevent bleeding in pedunculated colorectal polyps with head ≥ 20 mm or a stalk ≥ 10 mm in diameter, ESGE recommends pretreatment of the stalk with injection of dilute adrenaline and/or mechanical hemostasis. (Moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation.)5 ESGE recommends that the goals of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are to achieve a completely snare-resected lesion in the safest minimum number of pieces, with adequate margins and without need for adjunctive ablative techniques. (Low quality evidence; strong recommendation.)6 ESGE recommends careful lesion assessment prior to EMR to identify features suggestive of poor outcome. Features associated with incomplete resection or recurrence include lesion size > 40 mm, ileocecal valve location, prior failed attempts at resection, and size, morphology, site, and access (SMSA) level 4. (Moderate quality evidence; strong recommendation.)7 For intraprocedural bleeding, ESGE recommends endoscopic coagulation (snare-tip soft coagulation or coagulating forceps) or mechanical therapy, with or without the combined use of dilute adrenaline injection. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.)An algorithm of polypectomy recommendations according to shape and size of polyps is given (Fig. 1).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications

              Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel treatment of colorectal lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the full-thickness resection device.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prz Gastroenterol
                Prz Gastroenterol
                PG
                Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
                Termedia Publishing House
                1895-5770
                1897-4317
                21 November 2018
                2019
                : 14
                : 1
                : 86-88
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Endoscopic Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
                [2 ]Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Cezary Łoziński, Endoscopic Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 15 Garbary St, 61-866 Poznan, Poland. phone: +48 601 447 543. e-mail: pawlakatarzyna@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                34157
                10.5114/pg.2018.79717
                6444103
                6741090e-0b39-4cf0-bf94-d8360f8eff90
                Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

                History
                : 25 September 2018
                : 23 October 2018
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article