84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Generic, Scalable, and Rapid Time-Resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Assay for Antigen Detection—SARS-CoV-2 as a Proof of Concept

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has seen an unprecedented increase in the demand for rapid and reliable diagnostic tools, leaving many laboratories scrambling for resources. We present a fast and simple assay principle for antigen detection and demonstrate its functionality by detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens in nasopharyngeal swabs. The method is based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and S protein (SP) via time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) with donor- and acceptor-labeled polyclonal anti-NP and -SP antibodies. Using recombinant proteins and cell culture-grown SARS-CoV-2, the limits of detection were established as 25 pg of NP or 20 infectious units (IU) and 875 pg of SP or 625 IU. Testing reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-positive ( n = 48, with cycle threshold [ C T ] values from 11 to 30) or -negative ( n = 96) nasopharyngeal swabs demonstrated that the assay yielded positive results for all samples with C T values of <25 and for a single RT-PCR-negative sample. Virus isolation from the RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal swabs showed a strong association between the presence of infectious virus and a positive antigen test result. The NP-based assay showed 97.4% (37/38) sensitivity and 100% (10/10) specificity in comparison with virus isolation and 77.1% (37/48) sensitivity and 99.0% (95/96) specificity in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. The assay is performed in a buffer that neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, and the assay is relatively simple to set up as an “in-house” test. Here, SARS-CoV-2 served as the model pathogen, but the assay principle is applicable to other viral infections, and the test format could easily be adapted to high-throughput testing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor

          Summary The recent emergence of the novel, pathogenic SARS-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China and its rapid national and international spread pose a global health emergency. Cell entry of coronaviruses depends on binding of the viral spike (S) proteins to cellular receptors and on S protein priming by host cell proteases. Unravelling which cellular factors are used by SARS-CoV-2 for entry might provide insights into viral transmission and reveal therapeutic targets. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor approved for clinical use blocked entry and might constitute a treatment option. Finally, we show that the sera from convalescent SARS patients cross-neutralized SARS-2-S-driven entry. Our results reveal important commonalities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infection and identify a potential target for antiviral intervention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

            Background The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur. Aim We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. Methods Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology. Results The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019

              Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute infection of the respiratory tract that emerged in late 20191,2. Initial outbreaks in China involved 13.8% of cases with severe courses, and 6.1% of cases with critical courses3. This severe presentation may result from the virus using a virus receptor that is expressed predominantly in the lung2,4; the same receptor tropism is thought to have determined the pathogenicity-but also aided in the control-of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 20035. However, there are reports of cases of COVID-19 in which the patient shows mild upper respiratory tract symptoms, which suggests the potential for pre- or oligosymptomatic transmission6-8. There is an urgent need for information on virus replication, immunity and infectivity in specific sites of the body. Here we report a detailed virological analysis of nine cases of COVID-19 that provides proof of active virus replication in tissues of the upper respiratory tract. Pharyngeal virus shedding was very high during the first week of symptoms, with a peak at 7.11 × 108 RNA copies per throat swab on day 4. Infectious virus was readily isolated from samples derived from the throat or lung, but not from stool samples-in spite of high concentrations of virus RNA. Blood and urine samples never yielded virus. Active replication in the throat was confirmed by the presence of viral replicative RNA intermediates in the throat samples. We consistently detected sequence-distinct virus populations in throat and lung samples from one patient, proving independent replication. The shedding of viral RNA from sputum outlasted the end of symptoms. Seroconversion occurred after 7 days in 50% of patients (and by day 14 in all patients), but was not followed by a rapid decline in viral load. COVID-19 can present as a mild illness of the upper respiratory tract. The confirmation of active virus replication in the upper respiratory tract has implications for the containment of COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                mBio
                mbio
                mbio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                18 May 2021
                May-Jun 2021
                18 May 2021
                : 12
                : 3
                : e00902-21
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Medicum, Department of Virology, Helsinki, Finland
                [b ]University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Helsinki, Finland
                [c ]HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, Clinical Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [d ]Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
                [e ]University of Zürich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Zürich, Switzerland
                Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-5118
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-7817
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1528-044X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-7847
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-6832
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-122X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-7960
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-214X
                Article
                mBio00902-21
                10.1128/mBio.00902-21
                8262888
                34006662
                6a8b0043-b4ac-4166-9e69-ceccd5e9f87a
                Copyright © 2021 Rusanen et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 25 March 2021
                : 19 April 2021
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 10, Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 11, Words: 8514
                Funding
                Funded by: Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002341;
                Award ID: 308613
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002341;
                Award ID: 314119
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002341;
                Award ID: 335762
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                May/June 2021

                Life sciences
                antigen test,covid-19,sars-cov-2,tr-fret,mix and read,rapid diagnostic test
                Life sciences
                antigen test, covid-19, sars-cov-2, tr-fret, mix and read, rapid diagnostic test

                Comments

                Comment on this article