5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Specialty Drug Coverage Varies Across Commercial Health Plans In The US

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.

          To review literature on the impact of The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug risk communications on medication utilization, health care services use, and health outcomes. The authors searched MEDLINE and the Web of Science for manuscripts published between January 1990 and November 2010 that included terms related to drug utilization, the FDA, and advisories or warnings. We manually searched bibliographies and works citing selected articles and consulted with experts to guide study selection. Studies were included if they involved an empirical analysis evaluating the impact of an FDA risk communication. We extracted the drug(s) analyzed, relevant FDA communication(s), data source, analytical method, and main outcome(s) assessed. Of the 1432 records screened, 49 studies were included. These studies covered 16 medicines or therapeutic classes; one third examined communications regarding antidepressants. Most used medical or pharmacy claims and a few rigorously examined patient-provider communication, decision making, or risk perceptions. Advisories recommending increased clinical or laboratory monitoring generally led to decreased drug use, but only modest, short-term increases in monitoring. Communications targeting specific subpopulations often spilled over to other groups. Repeated or sequential advisories tended to have larger but delayed effects and decreased incident more than prevalent use. Drug-specific warnings were associated with particularly large decreases in utilization, although the magnitude of substitution within therapeutic classes varied across clinical contexts. Although some FDA drug risk communications had immediate and strong impacts, many had either delayed or had no impact on health care utilization or health behaviors. These data demonstrate the complexity of using risk communication to improve the quality and safety of prescription drug use, and suggest the importance of continued assessments of the effect of future advisories and label changes. Identifying factors that are associated with rapid and sustained responses to risk communications will be important for informing future risk communication efforts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coverage for High-Cost Specialty Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Medicare Part D

            More than 1 in 4 Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatoid arthritis use high-cost biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and spending for these drugs has risen sharply for Medicare Part D. Our aim was to conduct the first systematic, national investigation of how Part D plans cover biologic DMARDs and to determine patients' financial burden under current cost-sharing structures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Therapies For Advanced CancersPose A Special Challenge For Health Technology Assessment Organizations In Many Countries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Affairs
                Health Affairs
                Health Affairs (Project Hope)
                0278-2715
                1544-5208
                July 2018
                July 2018
                : 37
                : 7
                : 1041-1047
                Affiliations
                [1 ]James D. Chambers () is an investigator in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, and an associate professor of medicine in the School of Medicine, Tufts University, both in Boston, Massachusetts.
                [2 ]David D. Kim is an investigator in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, and an assistant professor of medicine in the School of Medicine, Tufts University.
                [3 ]Elle F. Pope is a research associate in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center.
                [4 ]Jennifer S. Graff is vice president of comparative effectiveness research at the National Pharmaceutical Council, in Washington, D.C.
                [5 ]Colby L. Wilkinson was a research assistant in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, when the majority of this research was conducted. He is now a graduate student at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, in Boston.
                [6 ]Peter J. Neumann is director of the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, and a professor of medicine in the School of Medicine, Tufts University.
                Article
                10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1553
                29985695
                6ae0f17e-4bf7-4276-b5c1-dde8a8df89d1
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article