3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      COVID‐19 frauds: An exploratory study of victimization during a global crisis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research Summary

          The COVID‐19 pandemic threated public health and safety and led to a number of virus‐related fraud schemes. We surveyed over 2,200 American adults to investigate their experiences with COVID‐19‐related frauds. Our goals were to better understand fraud targeting and victimization, as well as the impacts of fraud on victims. Over a quarter of our sample reported purchasing either a COVID‐19‐related product or a service, yet 42.5% reported feeling targeted for fraud. Being a target of COVID‐19 frauds is significantly linked to one's routine activities, however it is one's level of self‐control that more strongly predicts victimization. COVID‐19 anxieties mediate the impact of self‐control on purchasing.

          Policy Implications

          Legal interventions and increased regulations surrounding advertising are a potential mechanism for protecting consumers, yet “soft” interventions that interrupt routine activities might be more useful and applicable. The use of white‐lists and publicly available websites that allow e‐commerce sites and sellers to be verified would help enable higher levels of self‐guardianship. It is also important to provide continuous and clear messaging about what is being done to protect consumers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics

              This article examines online recruitment via Facebook, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), and Qualtrics panels in India and the United States. It compares over 7300 respondents—1000 or more from each source and country—to nationally representative benchmarks in terms of demographics, political attitudes and knowledge, cooperation, and experimental replication. In the United States, MTurk offers the cheapest and fastest recruitment, Qualtrics is most demographically and politically representative, and Facebook facilitates targeted sampling. The India samples look much less like the population, though Facebook offers broad geographical coverage. We find online convenience samples often provide valid inferences into how partisanship moderates treatment effects. Yet they are typically unrepresentative on such political variables, which has implications for the external validity of sample average treatment effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jpk@msu.edu
                Journal
                Criminol Public Policy
                Criminol Public Policy
                10.1111/(ISSN)1745-9133
                CAPP
                Criminology & Public Policy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1538-6473
                1745-9133
                05 August 2021
                05 August 2021
                : 10.1111/1745-9133.12554
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan
                [ 2 ] University of Nevada Las Vegas Las Vegas Nevada
                [ 3 ] University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jay P. Kennedy, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Dr., 522 Baker Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824.

                Email: jpk@ 123456msu.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-0393
                Article
                CAPP12554
                10.1111/1745-9133.12554
                8441749
                34539260
                6b715497-fc9a-41e7-ae7b-6a7994e6a732
                © 2021 American Society of Criminology

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 06 July 2021
                : 07 April 2021
                : 09 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Pages: 51, Words: 17322
                Funding
                Funded by: Michigan State University College of Social Science
                Award ID: COVID Small Grant Competition.
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.7 mode:remove_FC converted:15.09.2021

                fraud,covid‐19,self‐control,routine activity theory
                fraud, covid‐19, self‐control, routine activity theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article