4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Omadacycline against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

      1 , 1
      Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
      American Society for Microbiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing globally. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus complex are the most frequently encountered NTM, and oral treatment options are extremely limited for these pathogens, especially for the M. abscessus complex. In this study, the in vitro potency of omadacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, was tested against 111 isolates of NTM.

          ABSTRACT

          Infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing globally. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus complex are the most frequently encountered NTM, and oral treatment options are extremely limited for these pathogens, especially for the M. abscessus complex. In this study, the in vitro potency of omadacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, was tested against 111 isolates of NTM. MIC testing was performed as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute against 70 isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), of which >90% were tetracycline resistant. These included M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (20 isolates), M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (3), Mycobacterium chelonae (15 isolates), Mycobacterium immunogenum (7 isolates), the Mycobacterium fortuitum group, including six doxycycline-resistant isolates (12 isolates), and the Mycobacterium mucogenicum group, including four doxycycline-resistant isolates (10 isolates). Forty-one isolates of slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM), including 16 isolates of MAC, were also tested. Omadacycline was active against all RGM species, with MIC 50 ranges of 0.004 to 0.25 and 0.06 to 1 μg/ml for 80% and 100% inhibition, respectively. For M. abscessus subsp. abscessus , MIC 50 s were 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml with 80% and 100% inhibition, respectively. There was considerable trailing of the omadacycline endpoint with the RGM. MICs of tigecycline exhibited no trailing and were generally within 1 to 2 dilutions of the 100% inhibition omadacycline MICs. While there was no trailing observed in SGM, omadacycline MICs were higher (MIC range, 8 to >16 μg/ml; n = 41), as previously noted with tigecycline. This study supports further research of omadacycline, including clinical trials, for the treatment of RGM infections, especially M. abscessus .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
          Antimicrob Agents Chemother
          American Society for Microbiology
          0066-4804
          1098-6596
          February 17 2021
          February 17 2021
          : 65
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Mycobacteria/Nocardia Laboratory, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA
          Article
          10.1128/AAC.01947-20
          8092516
          33288634
          6b9bb4fa-5a7f-4b0d-8b8a-6683efbf307e
          © 2021

          https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article