3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Talimogene laherparepvec induces durable response of regionally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma in 4 consecutive patients

      case-report
      , BS a , , BS a , , MD, JD b , , RN BSN c , , MD c ,
      JAAD Case Reports
      Elsevier
      advanced Merkel cell carcinoma, durable response, immunotherapy, Merkel cell carcinoma, oncolytic virus, regionally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma, talimogene laherparepvec, CR, complete response, CT, computed tomography, FDA, US Food and Drug Administration, ICB, immune checkpoint blockade, MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, MCPyV, Merkel cell polyomavirus, ORR, objective response rate, PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1, PFS, progression-free survival, PET, positron emission tomography, SUV, standardized uptake values, TVEC, talimogene laherparepvec

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy derived from cutaneous neuroendocrine cells perceiving light touch. 1 MCC usually presents in elderly patients on sun-exposed areas, most commonly of the head and neck. 2 Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is directly involved in the pathogenesis of 80% of MCCs in which clonal integration results in expression of 2 key antigenic oncoproteins. 3 MCPyV-negative tumors harbor many ultraviolet signature mutations with high levels of infiltrating T lymphocytes and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. 4 MCC is thus an attractive target for immunotherapy because virus-positive tumors express foreign oncoproteins, and virus-negative tumors carry ultraviolet signature mutations providing non–self-epitopes for immune recognition. Historically, metastatic MCC was treated with chemotherapy. Although objective response rates (ORR) exceeded 50%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was approximately 3 months with no clear overall survival benefit. 5 Recent phase II trials of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced MCC targeting PD-1 with pembrolizumab or nivolumab or PD-L1 with avelumab have shown ORR of 65% in treatment-naïve patients and 40% following chemotherapy with PFS substantially superior to chemotherapy. However, fewer than 20% of patients achieve complete responses (CR), and the largest trial showed 12 months PFS of 30%. 6 In March 2017, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of avelumab for advanced MCC marked the dawn of a new era of treatment for this highly immune responsive malignancy. Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex 1 virus that encodes human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance dendritic cell antigen presentation. Intratumoral injection directly lyses malignant cells and alters the microenvironment favoring induction of systemic antitumor immunity. 7 TVEC received an indication for advanced melanoma in October 2015, making it the first FDA-approved oncolytic viral immunotherapy. Here we describe 4 consecutive patients treated with TVEC for regionally advanced MCC that ultimately achieved durable complete responses to therapy all ongoing for up to greater than 27 months following TVEC initiation with minimal toxicity. We have previously reported on cases 1 and 2 8 but have additional treatment and follow-up information. Overview of cases Four elderly white men underwent wide local excision of primary MCC arising in the head or neck (Table I) obtaining negative margins where anatomically possible. Risk factors for development of MCC included advanced age, prolonged statin use in patient 3, and immunosuppression for Crohn's disease in patient 4. 9 Serology from patients 1 and 2 was negative for antibody against MCPyV oncoprotein, although negative predictive value is low. All patients experienced multifocal, regional recurrence within 8 months of initial resection. TVEC therapy was selected based on the immunogenicity of MCC, absence of detectable distant metastases, significant cardiac comorbidity in patients 1 and 2 limiting their tolerance of potentially more toxic treatment, and concern that ICB could exacerbate underlying autoimmune conditions in patients 3 and 4 with Parkinson and Crohn's disease, respectively. Furthermore, avelumab was not FDA approved for MCC until March 2017, after TVEC initiation in patients 1 and 2. TVEC was administered according to the standard dose and schedule for melanoma into all injectable tumors. This treatment consists of an initial dose of 1 to 4 mL of 106 pfu/mL followed 3 weeks later by doses of 1 to 4 mL of 108 pfu/mL at 2-week intervals. Table I TVEC treatment outcomes Patient Age (yr) No. of TVEC injected lesions Best overall response Durable response (Y/N)∗ PFS (mo)† OS (mo)‡ 1 87 8 CR Y 24+ 24+ 2 77 4 CR Y 19 28+ 3 81 2 CR Y 10+ 10+ 4 76 3 CR Y 13+ 13+ Median — — — 16+ 18.5+ ∗ RECIST 1.1 response persisting for at least 6 months. † PFS calculated from first dose of TVEC. ‡ Overall survival calculated from first dose of TVEC. Case 1 Complete resection of a right cheek MCC was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Biopsy confirmed regional recurrence 7 months later with 3 dermal nodules, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) found a 9-mm hypermetabolic cutaneous nodule in the right cheek but no evidence of nodal or hematogenous metastases. Within 3 weeks, he had 8 palpable dermal metastases up to 1.4 cm widely distributed over the right side of the face from the orbital rim to the jaw. With the patient's consent, TVEC was administered on 4 occasions into all detectable metastases with toxicity limited to mild fatigue. Nine weeks after treatment initiation, he had a complete clinical response. 8 Serial physical examinations and PET/CTs at 3- to 4-month intervals have found no recurrence for greater than 24 months since initiating TVEC therapy. Case 2 An apical scalp MCC recurred 1 month after complete resection with palpable left postauricular and level IIA/B cervical lymphadenopathy up to 3 cm with PET standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 9.3 and 11.0, respectively, and no distant metastases. With the patient's consent, TVEC was administered into all palpable metastases on 8 occasions with toxicity limited to mild fatigue and transient nausea. Palpable, injectable disease resolved within 16 weeks, and a neck CT found a partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria with 46% reduction in index lesions with new central necrosis. PET/CT 4 months later showed resolution of hypermetabolism and further reduction of index lesions by 62% from baseline. 8 Fifteen months after TVEC discontinuation, the patient had a newly palpable, more anterior, left cervical node of 1.6 cm with maximum SUV of 10.7 (Fig 1). Needle biopsy confirmed MCC, and TVEC dosing was resumed. PET/CT 3 weeks after the seventh TVEC dose found shrinkage of the injected node to 1.1 cm with maximum SUV of 2.3 (Fig 1). TVEC was discontinued, and repeat PET/CT in April showed radiographic CR, which is ongoing more than 28 months after initiation of TVEC therapy. Fig 1 Top row represents pretreatment images including a PET/CT from patient 2 depicting the hypermetabolic left cervical node in (A) and a neck CT from patient 3 showing the left parotid and postauricular nodules (B and C, respectively). Bottom row provides comparable images soon after completing TVEC therapy from patient 2 (D) and patient 3 (E and F). Case 3 A left cheek MCC recurred 5 months after complete resection with neck CT showing bulky left parotid and left postauricular nodules 4.1 and 2.8 cm, respectively, with no distant metastases by chest and body CT (Fig 1). Biopsy confirmed surgically incurable MCC. With the patient's consent, TVEC was initiated, and the injected nodules transiently enlarged after the first 3 doses consistent with pseudoprogression but subsequently improved (Fig 2). After the seventh dose, a neck CT found the left parotid nodule had decreased to 2.9 cm and the postauricular nodule to 1.7 cm. An eighth, final dose of TVEC was administered followed 7 weeks later by biopsy of residual fullness in the left parotid region, which found fibroconnective tissue and plasma cells with no malignancy. Neck CT found resolution of the postauricular nodule to linear scarring (Fig 1). Toxicity consisted of mild, transient flu-like symptoms. Physical examinations and serial CT scans at 3-month intervals have shown no recurrence for more than 10 months after TVEC initiation. Fig 2 Photographs from patient 3 obtained immediately before TVEC initiation (A), with pseudoprogression after the third dose (B), and after dose 6 of 8 with marked improvement (C). Case 4 A patient with Crohn's disease treated with infliximab converted to vedolizumab, a gut-selective anti-inflammatory agent, had a right anterior neck MCC. Six months after wide local incision, MCC recurred with 2 palpable, dermal nodules along the scar. CT scans of the chest and body found no distant spread. Before resection could be performed, a third palpable metastasis developed in the right neck. TVEC was initiated with the patient's consent into 3 tumor nodules measuring up to 1.2 cm. After 5 doses, a clinical CR was achieved. Toxicity was minimal with no activation of Crohn's disease, and the patient has maintained a CR with serial physical examinations and PET/CTs for more than 13 months since TVEC initiation. Discussion ICB of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions is the most effective approved therapy for surgically incurable MCC. However, CRs are rare, and most patients progress in less than a year. Here we report promising results with TVEC in 4 consecutive patients with recurrent regionally advanced MCC. Durable CRs were achieved in all 4 patients with a median PFS of greater than 16 months and no serious adverse events (Table I). In addition to complete regional response of injected tumors, TVEC has also prevented outgrowth of distant metastases in these high-risk individuals. Our observations parallel the clinical trial experience with TVEC in melanoma showing greatest efficacy in stage IIIB/C patients with regionally advanced disease. 10 Interim analysis of a randomized phase II trial of TVEC neoadjuvant treatment plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable stage IIIB to IVM1a melanoma found a pathologic CR rate of 21% and an improved R0 resection rate from 41% to 56%. 11 Phase II trials are underway examining TVEC monotherapy in surgically incurable MCC, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell skin cancer and TVEC with or without radiotherapy for regionally advanced MCC or melanoma (Table II). Until data are available from these prospective studies, our observations provide compelling evidence that TVEC has important clinical activity in this rare malignancy and suggests a potential role for TVEC in marginally resectable MCC worthy of prospective evaluation. Table II Current trials of TVEC in cutaneous malignancies Treatment trial design Cancer types Indication Clinical Trials.gov Registry no. TVEC monotherapy Phase IIMCC, SCC, and BCC Locally advanced NCT03458117 TVEC ± radiotherapy Phase IIMCC and melanoma Locally advanced NCT02819843 TVEC + nivolumab Phase IIMCC, SCC, and BCC Locally advanced or widely metastatic NCT02978625 TVEC + pembrolizumab Phase Ib/IIImelanoma Locally advanced or widely metastatic NCT02263508 BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Although single-agent TVEC has limited utility in stage IV melanoma with lung or visceral metastases, combining it with ipilimumab CTLA-4 ICB appeared to enhance the ORR and PFS compared with monotherapy with either agent. 12 Similarly, the phase Ib portion of a phase Ib/III trial combining TVEC with pembrolizumab PD-1 ICB in advanced melanoma reported objective responses in 62% of patients with a CR rate of 33%, superior to either single agent. 13 Based on these observations, a basket trial is evaluating the combination of TVEC with nivolumab in advanced or refractory nonmelanoma skin cancers including MCC (Table II). The landscape of available cancer immunotherapeutics is evolving so rapidly that prospective evaluation of monotherapies and combinations in a malignancy as rare as MCC may not allow timely access to treatment. The combination of retrospective case series as provided here and extrapolation from similar, immune-responsive, more prevalent skin malignancies like melanoma may allow clinical implementation of important treatment advances years before prospective data can be obtained.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Merkel cell carcinoma demographics, morphology, and survival based on 3870 cases: a population based study.

          Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor arising predominantly on sun-exposed skin of older and usually immunosuppressed individuals. Using data from NCI's SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program from 1973 to 2006, we analyzed the demographics and survival of MCC. SEER had recorded 3870 cases of MCC. The incidence was higher in men (2380 cases, 61.5%) than in women (1490 cases, 38.5%). Most patients were White (94.9%) between 60 and 85 years of age. MCC was rare in Blacks. The most common location was the head and neck. The salivary glands, nasal cavity, lip, lymph nodes, vulva, vagina and esophagus were the most common extracutaneous sites. The 10-year relative survival rate was higher in women than men (64.8% vs. 50.5%, p < 0.001). Patients 50-69 years had the highest 10-year relative survival rate (59.6%). Stage of disease was the best predictor of survival. MCC arises predominantly in the skin of head and neck in White men above 70 years of age. Cases also occurred in extracutaneous sites. Age did not predict survival, yet gender, site and tumor size revealed clear differences. The most significant predictor of survival was tumor stage. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with stage IIIB/C and IVM1a melanoma: subanalysis of the Phase III OPTiM trial

            Objectives Talimogene laherparepvec is the first oncolytic immunotherapy to receive approval in Europe, the USA and Australia. In the randomized, open-label Phase III OPTiM trial (NCT00769704), talimogene laherparepvec significantly improved durable response rate (DRR) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in 436 patients with unresectable stage IIIB–IVM1c melanoma. The median overall survival (OS) was longer versus GM-CSF in patients with earlier-stage melanoma (IIIB–IVM1a). Here, we report a detailed subgroup analysis of the OPTiM study in patients with IIIB–IVM1a disease. Patients and methods The patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to intralesional talimogene laherparepvec or subcutaneous GM-CSF and were evaluated for DRR, overall response rate (ORR), OS, safety, benefit–risk and numbers needed to treat. Descriptive statistics were used for subgroup comparisons. Results Among 249 evaluated patients with stage IIIB–IVM1a melanoma, DRR was higher with talimogene laherparepvec compared with GM-CSF (25.2% versus 1.2%; P<0.0001). ORR was also higher in the talimogene laherparepvec arm (40.5% versus 2.3%; P<0.0001), and 27 patients in the talimogene laherparepvec arm had a complete response, compared with none in GM-CSF-treated patients. The incidence rates of exposure-adjusted adverse events (AE) and serious AEs were similar with both treatments. Conclusion The subgroup of patients with stage IIIB, IIIC and IVM1a melanoma (57.1% of the OPTiM intent-to-treat population) derived greater benefit in DRR and ORR from talimogene laherparepvec compared with GM-CSF. Talimogene laherparepvec was well tolerated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Merkel cell carcinoma: emerging biology, current approaches, and future directions.

              Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous cancer that predominantly occurs in patients who are older, and is associated with a high rate of distant failure and mortality. Current management strategies that incorporate surgery and radiotherapy achieve high rates of locoregional control, but distant failure rates remain problematic, highlighting the need for new effective systemic therapies. Chemotherapy can achieve high response rates of limited duration in the metastatic setting, but its role in definitive management remains unproven. Recent developments in our knowledge about the biology of MCC have led to the identification of new potential therapeutic targets and treatments. A key finding has been the discovery that a human polyomavirus may be a causative agent. However, emerging data suggests that MCC may actually be two distinct entities, viral-associated and viral-negative MCC, which is likely to have implications for the management of MCC in the future and for the development of new treatments. In this review, we discuss recent discoveries about the biology of MCC, current approaches to management, and new therapeutic strategies that are being investigated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-5126
                29 August 2019
                September 2019
                29 August 2019
                : 5
                : 9
                : 782-786
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
                [b ]Department of Radiology, General Radiology and Cardiopulmonary Section, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
                [c ]Division of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: Robert M. Conry, MD, Melanoma Program Director, Associate Professor, Division of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2145 Bonner Way, Birmingham, AL 35243. rconry@ 123456uabmc.edu
                Article
                S2352-5126(19)30345-5
                10.1016/j.jdcr.2019.06.034
                6728723
                31516997
                6b9f5280-ec93-445e-b699-af4f2c4a8ee8
                © 2019 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Series

                advanced merkel cell carcinoma,durable response,immunotherapy,merkel cell carcinoma,oncolytic virus,regionally advanced merkel cell carcinoma,talimogene laherparepvec,cr, complete response,ct, computed tomography,fda, us food and drug administration,icb, immune checkpoint blockade,mcc, merkel cell carcinoma,mcpyv, merkel cell polyomavirus,orr, objective response rate,pd-l1, programmed death ligand 1,pfs, progression-free survival,pet, positron emission tomography,suv, standardized uptake values,tvec, talimogene laherparepvec

                Comments

                Comment on this article