4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sulfur-based Mixotrophic Vanadium (V) Bio-reduction towards Lower Organic Requirement and Sulfate Accumulation

      , , , , ,
      Water Research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE.

          We re-evaluated PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis as a tool to survey denitrifying community composition in environmental samples. New primers for both nirS and nosZ were combined with existing primers, while for nirK the previously published F1aCu:R3Cu set was chosen for denaturing electrophoresis. All three sets yielded amplicons smaller than 500 bp and amplified the correct fragment in all environmental samples. The denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis worked satisfactorily for nirK and nosZ, but not for nirS. This was probably due to the multiple melting domains in this particular nirS fragment. From the excised and sequenced bands, only sequences related to the target genes were detected and tree analysis showed that the selected primers acted as broad range primers for each of the three genes. By use of the new nirS primers it was demonstrated that agricultural soil harbours a substantial diversity of nirS denitrifiers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bioelectrochemical metal recovery from wastewater: a review.

            Metal contaminated wastewater posts great health and environmental concerns, but it also provides opportunities for precious metal recovery, which may potentially make treatment processes more cost-effective and sustainable. Conventional metal recovery technologies include physical, chemical and biological methods, but they are generally energy and chemical intensive. The recent development of bioelectrochemical technology provides a new approach for efficient metal recovery, because it offers a flexible platform for both oxidation and reduction reaction oriented processes. While dozens of recent studies demonstrated the feasibility of the bioelectrochemical metal recovery concept, the mechanisms have been different and confusing. This study provides a review that summarizes and discusses the different fundamental mechanisms of metal conversion, with the aim of facilitating the scientific understanding and technology development. While the general approach of bioelectrochemical metal recovery is using metals as the electron acceptor in the cathode chamber and organic waste as the electron donor in the anode chamber, there are so far four mechanisms that have been reported: (1) direct metal recovery using abiotic cathodes; (2) metal recovery using abiotic cathodes supplemented by external power sources; (3) metal conversion using bio-cathodes; and (4) metal conversion using bio-cathodes supplemented by external power sources.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Vanadyl in natural waters: Adsorption and hydrolysis promote oxygenation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Water Research
                Water Research
                Elsevier BV
                00431354
                February 2021
                February 2021
                : 189
                : 116655
                Article
                10.1016/j.watres.2020.116655
                6bb038f8-2d2c-4705-9608-9e93eeed6a52
                © 2021

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article