3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health Taxes on Tobacco, Alcohol, Food and Drinks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Policy Content, Actors, Process and Context

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Taxation of tobacco, food, alcohol and other beverages has gained renewed attention in responding to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). While largely built on evidence from high-income countries (HICs), the projected economic and health benefits of these measures have increased calls for their use in price-sensitive low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, uptake has been sporadic and there remains little research on why and how LMICs utilise fiscal measures in response to NCDs.

          Methods: This scoping review analyses factors influencing the design and implementation of health-related fiscal measures in LMICs. Utilising Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology and Walt and Gilson’s policy triangle, we considered the contextual, procedural, content and stakeholder-related factors that influenced measures.

          Results: We identified 75 papers focussing on health-related fiscal measures, with 47 (63%) focused on tobacco, 5 on alcohol, 6 on soft drink and 4 studies on food-related fiscal regulation. Thirteen papers analysed multiple measures and most papers (n = 66, 88%) were less than a decade old. Key factors enabling the design and implementation of measures included localised health and economic evidence, policy championing, inter-ministerial support, and global or regional momentum. Impeding factors encompassed negative framing and retaliation by industry, vested interests and governmental policy disjuncture. Aligning with theoretic insights from the policy triangle, findings consistently demonstrated that the interplay between factors – rather than the presence or absence of particular factors – has the most profound impact on policy implementation.

          Conclusion: Given the growing urgency to address NCDs in LMICs, this review highlights the need for recognition and rigorous exploration of political economy factors influencing the design and implementation of fiscal measures. Broader LMIC-specific empirical research is needed to overcome an implication noted in much of the literature: that mechanisms used to enact tobacco taxation are universally applicable to measures targeting foods, alcohol and other beverages.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality.

              Why do some global health initiatives receive priority from international and national political leaders whereas others receive little attention? To analyse this question we propose a framework consisting of four categories: the strength of the actors involved in the initiative, the power of the ideas they use to portray the issue, the nature of the political contexts in which they operate, and characteristics of the issue itself. We apply this framework to the case of a global initiative to reduce maternal mortality, which was launched in 1987. We undertook archival research and interviewed people connected with the initiative, using a process-tracing method that is commonly employed in qualitative research. We report that despite two decades of effort the initiative remains in an early phase of development, hampered by difficulties in all these categories. However, the initiative's 20th year, 2007, presents opportunities to build political momentum. To generate political priority, advocates will need to address several challenges, including the creation of effective institutions to guide the initiative and the development of a public positioning of the issue to convince political leaders to act. We use the framework and case study to suggest areas for future research on the determinants of political priority for global health initiatives, which is a subject that has attracted much speculation but little scholarship.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                International Journal of Health Policy and Management
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                2322-5939
                April 2022
                06 September 2020
                : 11
                : 4
                : 414-428
                Affiliations
                1College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
                2School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
                3Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                4Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
                5Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Lana M. Elliott Email: lana.elliott@ 123456qut.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-6957
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-5193
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3448-7983
                Article
                10.34172/ijhpm.2020.170
                9309941
                32945639
                6bcf27a0-7b22-418c-9511-4c94647ef120
                © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 February 2020
                : 25 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, References: 137, Pages: 15
                Categories
                Scoping Review

                non-communicable diseases,ncds,fiscal,tax,policy,lmics
                non-communicable diseases, ncds, fiscal, tax, policy, lmics

                Comments

                Comment on this article