0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

      1 , ,
      The Journal of arthroplasty
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Four wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty were compared in a prospective, randomized, controlled, institutional review board-approved study with 75 subjects. The study compared tissue adhesives, stapling, and suturing with respect to procedure time and cost, together with functional and clinical outcome. Total knee arthroplasty closure time (capsule to cutaneous) favored staples at 26 s/cm, followed by adhesives (45 and 37 s/cm for 2-octyl and n-butyl-2, respectively) and, finally, subcuticular suturing at 54 s/cm (P < .0007). Reduced procedure time translated into intraoperative cost reduction where closure cost per centimeter was $70, $62, $57, and $75 for 2-octyl, n-butyl-2, staples, and sutures, respectively. No significant differences in infection, dehiscence, cosmesis, general health (SF-12v2 (QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln, RI)), and functional and clinical assessments (range of motion, Knee Society knee score, and pain) were observed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Arthroplasty
          The Journal of arthroplasty
          Elsevier BV
          1532-8406
          0883-5403
          Dec 2011
          : 26
          : 8
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
          Article
          S0883-5403(11)00112-4
          10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.029
          21531114
          6c1c1df3-4281-4833-a9bb-c510ee1bfd12
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article