35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unraveling a 146 Years Old Taxonomic Puzzle: Validation of Malabar Snakehead, Species-Status and Its Relevance for Channid Systematics and Evolution

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Malabar snakehead Channa diplogramma is one of the most enigmatic and least understood species within the family Channidae, which comprise one of the most important groups of freshwater food fish in tropical Asia. Since its description from peninsular India in 1865, it has remained a taxonomic puzzle with many researchers questioning its validity, based on its striking similarity with the South East Asian C. micropeltes. In this study, we assessed the identity of the Malabar snakehead, C. diplogramma, using morphological and molecular genetic analyses, and also evaluated its phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary biogeography.

          Methodology/Principal Findings

          The morphometric and meristic analysis provided conclusive evidence to separate C. diplogramma and C. micropeltes as two distinct species. Number of caudal fin rays, lateral line scales, scales below lateral line; total vertebrae, pre-anal length and body depth were the most prominent characters that can be used to differentiate both the species. Channa diplogramma also shows several ontogenic color phases during its life history, which is shared with C. micropeltes. Finally, the genetic distance between both species for the partial mitochondrial 16S rRNA and COI sequences is also well above the intra-specific genetic distances of any other channid species compared in this study.

          Conclusions/Significance

          The current distribution of C. diplogramma and C. micropeltes is best explained by vicariance. The significant variation in the key taxonomic characters and the results of the molecular marker analysis points towards an allopatric speciation event or vicariant divergence from a common ancestor, which molecular data suggests to have occurred as early as 21.76 million years ago. The resurrection of C. diplogramma from the synonymy of C. micropeltes has hence been confirmed 146 years after its initial description and 134 years after it was synonymised, establishing it is an endemic species of peninsular India and prioritizing its conservation value.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics

          Background Most analysis programs for inferring molecular phylogenies are difficult to use, in particular for researchers with little programming experience. Results TREEFINDER is an easy-to-use integrative platform-independent analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. In this paper the main features of TREEFINDER (version of April 2004) are described. TREEFINDER is written in ANSI C and Java and implements powerful statistical approaches for inferring gene tree and related analyzes. In addition, it provides a user-friendly graphical interface and a phylogenetic programming language. Conclusions TREEFINDER is a versatile framework for analyzing phylogenetic data across different platforms that is suited both for exploratory as well as advanced studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages.

            Most of the sophisticated methods to estimate evolutionary divergence between DNA sequences assume that the two sequences have evolved with the same pattern of nucleotide substitution after their divergence from their most recent common ancestor (homogeneity assumption). If this assumption is violated, the evolutionary distance estimated will be biased, which may result in biased estimates of divergence times and substitution rates, and may lead to erroneous branching patterns in the inferred phylogenies. Here we present a simple modification for existing distance estimation methods to relax the assumption of the substitution pattern homogeneity among lineages when analyzing DNA and protein sequences. Results from computer simulations and empirical data analyses for human and mouse genes are presented to demonstrate that the proposed modification reduces the estimation bias considerably and that the modified method performs much better than the LogDet methods, which do not require the homogeneity assumption in estimating the number of substitutions per site. We also discuss the relationship of the substitution and mutation rate estimates when the substitution pattern is not the same in the lineages leading to the two sequences compared.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution.

              Animal color pattern phenotypes evolve rapidly. What influences their evolution? Because color patterns are used in communication, selection for signal efficacy, relative to the intended receiver's visual system, may explain and predict the direction of evolution. We investigated this in bowerbirds, whose color patterns consist of plumage, bower structure, and ornaments and whose visual displays are presented under predictable visual conditions. We used data on avian vision, environmental conditions, color pattern properties, and an estimate of the bowerbird phylogeny to test hypotheses about evolutionary effects of visual processing. Different components of the color pattern evolve differently. Plumage sexual dimorphism increased and then decreased, while overall (plumage plus bower) visual contrast increased. The use of bowers allows relative crypsis of the bird but increased efficacy of the signal as a whole. Ornaments do not elaborate existing plumage features but instead are innovations (new color schemes) that increase signal efficacy. Isolation between species could be facilitated by plumage but not ornaments, because we observed character displacement only in plumage. Bowerbird color pattern evolution is at least partially predictable from the function of the visual system and from knowledge of different functions of different components of the color patterns. This provides clues to how more constrained visual signaling systems may evolve.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2011
                24 June 2011
                : 6
                : 6
                : e21272
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Zoology, Fatima Mata National College, Kollam, Kerala, India
                [2 ]Centre for Aquaculture Research and Extension, St. Xavier's College, Palayamkottai, Tamil Nadu, India
                [3 ]CIMAR/CIIMAR, Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [4 ]Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [5 ]Conservation Research Group, St. Albert's College, Kochi, Kerala, India
                [6 ]Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Concert for Ecology and Applied Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India
                [8 ]Institute of Tropical Aquaculture, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
                [9 ]Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, St. Johns College, Anchal, Kerala, India
                [10 ]Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India
                [11 ]Marine Biotechnology Division, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, Kerala, India
                [12 ]Zoological Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                [13 ]Ichthyology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
                [14 ]Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
                Biodiversity Insitute of Ontario - University of Guelph, Canada
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: AB SP RR PHAA AA. Performed the experiments: AB SP PHAA MS. Analyzed the data: AB SP RR ND AA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FB JT RP RB KRD KVR MAH AA. Wrote the paper: SP RR RB ND AA.

                Article
                PONE-D-10-05910
                10.1371/journal.pone.0021272
                3123301
                21731689
                6d49a5ec-f1b8-455b-b862-e0c9da454b2e
                Benziger et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 3 December 2010
                : 26 May 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Systematics
                Molecular Systematics
                Phylogenetics
                Genetics
                Animal Genetics
                Zoology
                Ichthyology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article