10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing Endogenous Pain Inhibition: Test–Retest Reliability of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Local and Remote Body Parts After Aerobic Cycling

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Acute exercise can trigger a hypoalgesic response (exercise-induced hypoalgesia [EIH]) in healthy subjects. Despite promising application possibilities of EIH in the clinical context, its reliability has not been sufficiently examined. This study therefore investigated the between-session and within-subject test–retest reliability of EIH at local and remote body parts after aerobic cycling at a heart rate–controlled intensity.

          Methods

          Thirty healthy adults (15 women) performed 15 minutes of aerobic cycling in two sessions. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed at the leg (local), the back (semilocal), and the hand (remote) before, immediately after, and 15 minutes after exercise. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for absolute and percent changes in PPT from baseline to immediately postexercise, and between-session agreement of EIH responders was examined.

          Results

          PPTs significantly increased at the leg during both sessions (all P < 0.001) and at the back during session 2 (P < 0.001), indicating EIH. Fair between-session reliability was shown for absolute changes at the leg (ICC = 0.54) and the back (ICC = 0.40), whereas the reliability of percent changes was poor (ICC < 0.33). Reliability at the hand was poor for both absolute and percent changes (ICC < 0.33). Agreement in EIH responders was not significant for EIH at the leg or the back (all P > 0.05).

          Conclusions

          Our results suggest fair test–retest reliability of EIH after aerobic cycling for local and semilocal body parts, but only in men, demonstrating the need for more standardized methodological approaches to improve EIH as a clinical parameter.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study

          Background Many randomized trials involve measuring a continuous outcome - such as pain, body weight or blood pressure - at baseline and after treatment. In this paper, I compare four possibilities for how such trials can be analyzed: post-treatment; change between baseline and post-treatment; percentage change between baseline and post-treatment and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline score as a covariate. The statistical power of each method was determined for a hypothetical randomized trial under a range of correlations between baseline and post-treatment scores. Results ANCOVA has the highest statistical power. Change from baseline has acceptable power when correlation between baseline and post-treatment scores is high;when correlation is low, analyzing only post-treatment scores has reasonable power. Percentage change from baseline has the lowest statistical power and was highly sensitive to changes in variance. Theoretical considerations suggest that percentage change from baseline will also fail to protect from bias in the case of baseline imbalance and will lead to an excess of trials with non-normally distributed outcome data. Conclusions Percentage change from baseline should not be used in statistical analysis. Trialists wishing to report this statistic should use another method, such as ANCOVA, and convert the results to a percentage change by using mean baseline scores.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Exercise-induced hypoalgesia and intensity of exercise.

            Pain sensitivity has been found to be altered following exercise. A number of investigators have found diminished sensitivity to pain (hypoalgesia) during and following exercise. However, currently it is unknown whether there is a specific intensity of exercise that is required to produce this hypoalgesia response. Aerobic exercise, such as cycling and running, have been studied most often, and a number of different exercise protocols have been used in this research including: (i) increasing exercise intensity by progressively increasing the workloads; (ii) prescribing a particular exercise intensity based on a percentage of maximum; and (iii) having participants self-select the exercise intensity. Results indicate that hypoalgesia occurred consistently following high-intensity exercise. In the studies in which exercise intensity was increased by increasing workloads, hypoalgesia was found most consistently with a workload of 200 W and above. Hypoalgesia was also found following exercise prescribed at a percentage of maximal oxygen uptake (e.g. 60 to 75%). Results are less consistent for studies that prescribed exercise based on percentage of heart rate maximum, as well as for studies that let participants self-select the exercise intensity. However, there has not been a systematic manipulation of exercise intensity in most of the studies conducted in this area. In addition, the interaction between exercise intensity and exercise duration, more than likely influences whether hypoalgesia occurs following exercise. There is a need for research to be conducted in which both intensity and duration of exercise are manipulated in a systematic manner to determine the 'optimal dose' of exercise that is required to produce hypoalgesia. In addition, there is a need for more research with other modes of exercise (e.g. resistance exercise, isometric exercise) to determine the optimal dose of exercise required to produce hypoalgesia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Doubly labelled water validation of three physical activity questionnaires.

              This study investigated the validity of the Baecke Questionnaire, the Five City Project Questionnaire, and the Tecumseh Community Health Study Questionnaire in 19 Flemish males, using correlation and multiple stepwise regression analyses. The three questionnaires are commonly used physical activity questionnaires in epidemiological studies. The physical activity level (PAL) as measured with the doubly labelled water method was used as the criterion. The Baecke total activity index showed the highest correlation coefficient with PAL (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Also the sweat index from the Five City Project Questionnaire, and total daily energy expenditure from the Tecumseh Community Health Study Questionnaire showed significant associations with PAL, respectively 0.57 (p < 0.05) and 0.64 (p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analyses supported the findings from the correlation study. The largest individual contribution in PAL was from the activity index (45%) for the Baecke Questionnaire, the sweat index (29%) for the Five City Project Questionnaire, and total daily energy expenditure (38%) for the Tecumseh Community Health Study Questionnaire. In conclusion, the questionnaires, and certainly the Baecke Questionnaire, can provide valid data about physical activity. Therefore they are useful in epidemiological studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pain Medicine
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1526-2375
                1526-4637
                November 2019
                November 01 2019
                June 18 2019
                November 2019
                November 01 2019
                June 18 2019
                : 20
                : 11
                : 2272-2282
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [3 ]Pain Research Group, Pain Center South, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark
                [4 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
                [5 ]Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
                [6 ]Pain in Motion International Research Group
                [7 ]Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [8 ]Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
                Article
                10.1093/pm/pnz131
                31211385
                7017540f-3999-4ece-9f54-90eb918aa9e1
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article