1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A trait‐based framework for dung beetle functional ecology

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1. Traits are key for understanding the environmental responses and ecological roles of organisms. Trait approaches to functional ecology are well established for plants, whereas consistent frameworks for animal groups are less developed. Here we suggest a framework for the study of the functional ecology of animals from a trait‐based response–effect approach, using dung beetles as model system. Dung beetles are a key group of decomposers that are important for many ecosystem processes. The lack of a trait‐based framework tailored to this group has limited the use of traits in dung beetle functional ecology.

          2. We review which dung beetle traits respond to the environment and affect ecosystem processes, covering the wide range of spatial, temporal and biological scales at which they are involved. Dung beetles show trait‐based responses to variation in temperature, water, soil properties, trophic resources, light, vegetation structure, competition, predation and parasitism. Dung beetles' influence on ecosystem processes includes trait‐mediated effects on nutrient cycling, bioturbation, plant growth, seed dispersal, other dung‐based organisms and parasite transmission, as well as some cases of pollination and predation.

          3. We identify 66 dung beetle traits that are either response or effect traits, or both, pertaining to six main categories: morphology, feeding, reproduction, physiology, activity and movement. Several traits pertain to more than one category, in particular dung relocation behaviour during nesting or feeding. We also identify 136 trait–response and 77 trait–effect relationships in dung beetles.

          4. No response to environmental stressors nor effect over ecological processes were related with traits of a single category. This highlights the interrelationship between the traits shaping body‐plans, the multi‐functionality of traits, and their role linking responses to the environment and effects on the ecosystem.

          5. Despite current developments in dung beetle functional ecology, many knowledge gaps remain, and there are biases towards certain traits, functions, taxonomic groups and regions. Our framework provides the foundations for the thorough development of trait‐based dung beetle ecology. It also serves as an example framework for other taxa.

          Abstract

          This paper reviews the current state of the art on trait‐based responses and ecosystem effects of Scarabaeidae dung beetles. It provides synthetic figures that depict their main responses to the environment and key functional roles, which are central to several nutrient cycles and other important functions in many tropical and temperate ecosystems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references297

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits.

          There is considerable debate about whether community ecology will ever produce general principles. We suggest here that this can be achieved but that community ecology has lost its way by focusing on pairwise species interactions independent of the environment. We assert that community ecology should return to an emphasis on four themes that are tied together by a two-step process: how the fundamental niche is governed by functional traits within the context of abiotic environmental gradients; and how the interaction between traits and fundamental niches maps onto the realized niche in the context of a biotic interaction milieu. We suggest this approach can create a more quantitative and predictive science that can more readily address issues of global change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Let the concept of trait be functional!

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                indradatta@riseup.net
                jhortal@mncn.csic.es
                Journal
                J Anim Ecol
                J Anim Ecol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2656
                JANE
                The Journal of Animal Ecology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0021-8790
                1365-2656
                28 November 2022
                January 2023
                : 92
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/jane.v92.1 )
                : 44-65
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Germans Cabot Franciscans 48 Bunyola Spain
                [ 2 ] Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada Granada Spain
                [ 3 ] Insect Ecology Lab, Natural History Museum University of New England Armidale New South Wales Australia
                [ 4 ] Department of Ecological Science Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
                [ 6 ] Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 Montpellier France
                [ 7 ] Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK
                [ 8 ] Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland
                [ 9 ] Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology University of Torino Torino Italy
                [ 10 ] Department of Ecology University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
                [ 11 ] Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG‐UAM), Departamento de Ecología Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain
                [ 12 ] Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC‐UAM) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain
                [ 13 ] Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee United States
                [ 14 ] Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore
                [ 15 ] Department of Biogeography and Global Change Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN‐CSIC) Madrid Spain
                [ 16 ] Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás Goiânia Brazil
                [ 17 ] cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Indradatta de Castro‐Arrazola and Joaquín Hortal

                Email: indradatta@ 123456riseup.net and jhortal@ 123456mncn.csic.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-5730
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-2307
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-8503
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-7924
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-3974
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-5809
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-3198
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-9079
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-6842
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-8318
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-792X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-2223
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-1196
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-8877
                Article
                JANE13829 JAE-2022-00179.R1
                10.1111/1365-2656.13829
                10099951
                36443916
                7018e1c8-4547-4ad7-80a8-657a9c972e3e
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 26 April 2022
                : 27 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 22, Words: 17472
                Funding
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation , doi 10.13039/501100004837;
                Award ID: BES‐2012‐054353
                Funded by: Ramón y Cajal Fellowship
                Award ID: RYC2020‐029407‐I
                Funded by: Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación Projects
                Award ID: PID2019‐106840GB‐C21/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
                Award ID: CGL2011‐29317
                Categories
                Entomology
                Functional Ecology
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.04.2023

                Ecology
                ecosystem engineers,ecosystem processes,effect traits,multifunctionality,response traits,scarabaeoidea,trait–function relationships

                Comments

                Comment on this article