19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Constitutive emission of the aphid alarm pheromone, ( E)-β-farnesene, from plants does not serve as a direct defense against aphids

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1
      BMC Ecology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The sesquiterpene, ( E)-β-farnesene (EBF), is the principal component of the alarm pheromone of many aphid species. Released when aphids are attacked by enemies, EBF leads aphids to undertake predator avoidance behaviors and to produce more winged offspring that can leave the plant. Many plants also release EBF as a volatile, and so it has been proposed that this compound could act to defend plants against aphid infestation by 1) deterring aphids from settling, 2) reducing aphid performance due to frequent interruption of feeding and 3) inducing the production of more winged offspring. Here we tested the costs and benefits of EBF as a defense against the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana lines engineered to continuously emit EBF.

          Results

          No metabolic costs of EBF synthesis could be detected in these plants as they showed no differences in growth or seed production from wild-type controls under two fertilizer regimes. Likewise, no evidence was found for the ability of EBF to directly defend the plant against aphids. EBF emission did not significantly repel winged or wingless morphs from settling on plants. Nor did EBF reduce aphid performance, measured as reproduction, or lead to an increase in the proportion of winged offspring.

          Conclusions

          The lack of any defensive effect of EBF in this study might be due to the fact that natural enemy attack on individual aphids leads to a pulsed emission, but the transgenic lines tested continuously produce EBF to which aphids may become habituated. Thus our results provide no support for the hypothesis that plant emission of the aphid alarm pheromone EBF is a direct defense against aphids. However, there is scattered evidence elsewhere in the literature suggesting that EBF emission might serve as an indirect defense by attracting aphid predators.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          BMC Ecol
          BMC Ecology
          BioMed Central
          1472-6785
          2010
          23 November 2010
          : 10
          : 23
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Biochemistry, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany
          Article
          1472-6785-10-23
          10.1186/1472-6785-10-23
          3002888
          21092302
          705d19f3-9894-450f-b0bf-2c5cfc6bdf12
          Copyright ©2010 Kunert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          : 3 June 2010
          : 23 November 2010
          Categories
          Research Article

          Ecology
          Ecology

          Comments

          Comment on this article