Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increasing access to specialty care for rare diseases: a case study using a foundation sponsored clinic network for patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Our primary aim was to assess the ability of a non-profit foundation-sponsored clinic network to facilitate access to specialized care for patients with neurofibromatoses (NF), a group of neurogenetic disorders including NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis (SWN). Our secondary aim was to identify how our findings in NF could be applied more broadly to other rare diseases.

          Methods

          We retrospectively reviewed aggregate data on patient volume reported by specialty NF clinics in a nonprofit network from 2008 to 2015. We classified clinics as high or low volume for disease type (NF1 and NF2/schwannomatosis) and pediatric/adult care. We compared clinic-level data to self-reported patient-level data from a large online patient registry.

          Results

          Between 2008 and 2015, the number of certified NF clinics grew from 32 to 50, and annual patient volume rose from 6776 to 10,245 patients (13% of the total estimated U.S. NF patient population). For patient registry participants ( n = 4476), the median driving distance to the nearest network clinic was 51.3 miles. Driving distances to reach high-volume centers were elevated for adults compared to children (295.8 vs. 67.9 miles), and schwannomatosis and NF2 patients compared to NF1 patients (310.9 vs. 368.1 vs. 161.7 miles). Of registry participants reporting their location of care ( n = 2271), only 43.2% received care in a network specialty clinic, with especially low rates of attendance in the Southwest and Far West.

          Conclusions

          While the number of certified NF clinics and volume of patients seen in these clinics has increased, many NF patients still do not attend specialty clinics and/or travel a significant distance for care. Geographic access to care is more limited for adults, patients with rarer conditions, and patients in the Western U.S. Potential measures to improve access to specialty care for people living with NF and other rare diseases are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neurofibromatosis type 1

          Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a complex autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in the NF1 tumour suppressor gene. Nearly all individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 develop pigmentary lesions (café-au-lait macules, skinfold freckling and Lisch nodules) and dermal neurofibromas. Some individuals develop skeletal abnormalities (scoliosis, tibial pseudarthrosis and orbital dysplasia), brain tumours (optic pathway gliomas and glioblastoma), peripheral nerve tumours (spinal neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours), learning disabilities, attention deficits, and social and behavioural problems, which can negatively affect quality of life. With the identification of NF1 and the generation of accurate preclinical mouse strains that model some of these clinical features, therapies that target the underlying molecular and cellular pathophysiology for neurofibromatosis type 1 are becoming available. Although no single treatment exists, current clinical management strategies include early detection of disease phenotypes (risk assessment) and biologically targeted therapies. Similarly, new medical and behavioural interventions are emerging to improve the quality of life of patients. Although considerable progress has been made in understanding this condition, numerous challenges remain; a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach is required to manage individuals with neurofibromatosis type1 and to develop effective treatments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1.

            Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a common neurocutaneous condition with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. The complications are diverse and disease expression varies, even within families. Progress in molecular biology and neuroimaging and the development of mouse models have helped to elucidate the aetiology of NF1 and its clinical manifestations. Furthermore, these advances have raised the prospect of therapeutic intervention for this complex and distressing disease. Members of the United Kingdom Neurofibromatosis Association Clinical Advisory Board collaborated to produce a consensus statement on the current guidelines for diagnosis and management of NF1. The proposals are based on published clinical studies and on the pooled knowledge of experts in neurofibromatosis with experience of providing multidisciplinary clinical and molecular services for NF1 patients. The consensus statement discusses the diagnostic criteria, major differential diagnoses, clinical manifestations and the present strategies for monitoring and management of NF1 complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              NF1 gene and neurofibromatosis 1.

              Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), also known as von Recklinghausen disease, is an autosomal dominant condition caused by mutations of the NF1 gene, which is located at chromosome 17q11.2. NF1 is believed to be completely penetrant, but substantial variability in expression of features occurs. Diagnosis of NF1 is based on established clinical criteria. The presentation of many of the clinical features is age dependent. The average life expectancy of patients with NF1 is probably reduced by 10-15 years, and malignancy is the most common cause of death. The prevalence of clinically diagnosed NF1 ranges from 1/2,000 to 1/5,000 in most population-based studies. A wide variety of NF1 mutations has been found in patients with NF1, but no frequently recurring mutation has been identified. Most studies have not found an obvious relation between particular NF1 mutations and the resulting clinical manifestations. The variability of the NF1 phenotype, even in individuals with the same NF1 gene mutation, suggests that other factors are involved in determining the clinical manifestations, but the nature of these factors has not yet been determined. Laboratory testing for NF1 mutations is difficult. A protein truncation test is commercially available, but its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value have not been established. No general, population-based molecular studies of NF1 mutations have been performed. At this time, it appears that the benefits of population-based screening for clinical features of NF1 would not outweigh the costs of screening.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                617-643-5532 , vmerker@mgh.harvard.edu
                adai@bcm.edu
                hradtke@ctf.org
                pknight@ctf.org
                jtjordan@mgh.harvard.edu
                splotkin@mgh.havard.edu
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                29 August 2018
                29 August 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 668
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9924, GRID grid.32224.35, Department of Neurology and Cancer Center, , Massachusetts General Hospital, ; 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, GRID grid.189504.1, Department of Health Policy and Management, , Boston University School of Public Health, ; 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 000000041936754X, GRID grid.38142.3c, Harvard College, ; Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.421144.6, Children’s Tumor Foundation, ; 120 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2111 8460, GRID grid.30760.32, Medical College of Wisconsin, ; 9000 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-5227
                Article
                3471
                10.1186/s12913-018-3471-5
                6114484
                30157837
                706f1a9b-eec0-46b0-8a0d-1f2e513034d5
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 November 2017
                : 14 August 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                neurofibromatosis,schwannomatosis,rare diseases,health service research,health services accessibility,healthcare disparities

                Comments

                Comment on this article