111
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    7
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extreme weather events in developing countries and related injuries and mental health disorders - a systematic review

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ,
      BMC Public Health
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Due to climate change, extreme weather events have an incremental impact on human health. Injuries and mental health disorders are a particular burden of disease, which is broadly investigated in high income countries. Most distressed populations are, however, those in developing countries. Therefore, this study investigates mental and physical health impacts arising from extreme weather events in these populations.

          Method

          Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), injury [primary outcomes], anxiety and depressive disorders [secondary outcomes], caused by weather extremes were systematically analyzed in people of developing countries. A systematic review of observational studies was conducted searching six databases, complemented by hand search, and utilizing two search engines. Review processing was done independently by two reviewers. Prevalence rates were analyzed in a pre/post design; an additional semi-structured search was conducted, to provide reference data for studies not incorporating reference values.

          Results

          All 17 identified studies (70,842 individuals) indicate a disease increase, compared to the reference data. Increase ranges from 0.7–52.6 % for PTSD, and from 0.3–37.3 % for injury. No studies on droughts and heatwaves were identified. All studies were conducted in South America and Asia.

          Conclusion

          There is an increased burden of psychological diseases and injury. This finding needs to be incorporated into activities of prevention, preparedness and general health care of those developing countries increasingly experiencing extreme weather events. There is also a gap in research in Africa (in quantity and quality) of studies in this field and a predominant heterogeneity of health assessment tools.

          PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42014009109

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3692-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review

              Background The Summit of Independent European Vaccination Experts (SIEVE) recommended in 2007 that efforts be made to improve healthcare workers’ knowledge and beliefs about vaccines, and their attitudes towards them, to increase vaccination coverage. The aim of the study was to compile and analyze the areas of disagreement in the existing evidence about the relationship between healthcare workers’ knowledge, beliefs and attitudes about vaccines and their intentions to vaccinate the populations they serve. Methods We conducted a systematic search in four electronic databases for studies published in any of seven different languages between February 1998 and June 2009. We included studies conducted in developed countries that used statistical methods to relate or associate the variables included in our research question. Two independent reviewers verified that the studies met the inclusion criteria, assessed the quality of the studies and extracted their relevant characteristics. The data were descriptively analyzed. Results Of the 2354 references identified in the initial search, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The diversity in the study designs and in the methods used to measure the variables made it impossible to integrate the results, and each study had to be assessed individually. All the studies found an association in the direction postulated by the SIEVE experts: among healthcare workers, higher awareness, beliefs that are more aligned with scientific evidence and more favorable attitudes toward vaccination were associated with greater intentions to vaccinate. All the studies included were cross-sectional; thus, no causal relationship between the variables was established. Conclusion The results suggest that interventions aimed at improving healthcare workers’ knowledge, beliefs and attitudes about vaccines should be encouraged, and their impact on vaccination coverage should be assessed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 (351) 3177-453 , susan.garthus-niegel@tu-dresden.de
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                29 September 2016
                29 September 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 1020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
                [2 ]Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [3 ]Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Child Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [5 ]Institute and Outpatient Clinics of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
                Article
                3692
                10.1186/s12889-016-3692-7
                5041325
                27682833
                7079e475-3572-4680-9d4e-7dd2003e2c0b
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 March 2016
                : 21 September 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article