20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States : Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States

      , , ,
      Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
      Guttmacher Institute

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d14089367e119">CONTEXT</h5> <p id="P1">Abortion availability and accessibility vary by state. Especially in areas where services are restricted or limited, some women travel to obtain abortion services in other states. Little is known about the experience of travel to obtain abortion. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d14089367e124">METHODS</h5> <p id="P2">In January and February 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 patients seeking abortion services at six facilities in Michigan and New Mexico. Eligible women were 18 or older, spoke English, and had traveled either across state lines or more than 100 miles within the state. Respondents were asked to describe their experience from pregnancy discovery to the day of the abortion procedure. Barriers to accessing abortion care and consequences of these barriers were identified through inductive and deductive analysis. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d14089367e129">RESULTS</h5> <p id="P3">Respondents described 15 barriers to abortion care while traveling to obtain services, and three major consequences of experiencing those barriers. Barriers were grouped into five categories: travel-related logistical issues, system navigation issues, limited clinic options, financial issues, and state or clinic restrictions. Consequences were delays in care, negative mental health impacts and considering self-induction. The experience of barriers complicated the process of obtaining an abortion, but the effect of any individual barrier was unclear. Instead, the experience of multiple barriers appeared to have a compounding effect, resulting in negative consequences for women traveling for abortion. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d14089367e134">CONCLUSION</h5> <p id="P4">The amalgamation of barriers to abortion care experienced simultaneously can have significant consequences for patients. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.

          The idea that abortion leads to adverse psychological outcomes has been the basis for legislation mandating counseling before obtaining an abortion and other policies to restrict access to abortion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.

            We examined the factors influencing delay in seeking abortion and the outcomes for women denied abortion care because of gestational age limits at abortion facilities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.

              To evaluate the additional burdens experienced by Texas abortion patients whose nearest in-state clinic was one of more than half of facilities providing abortion that had closed after the introduction of House Bill 2 in 2013.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
                Perspect Sex Repro H
                Guttmacher Institute
                15386341
                June 2017
                June 2017
                : 49
                : 2
                : 95-102
                Article
                10.1363/psrh.12024
                5953191
                28394463
                70bb825c-8bfd-418b-bc2e-1ea3b8bb46f2
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article