10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Large-scale serum protein biomarker discovery in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare and devastating muscle disease caused by mutations in the X-linked DMD gene (which encodes the dystrophin protein). Serum biomarkers hold significant potential as objective phenotypic measures of DMD disease state, as well as potential measures of pharmacological effects of and response to therapeutic interventions. Here we describe a proteomics approach to determine serum levels of 1,125 proteins in 93 DMD patients and 45 controls. The study identified 44 biomarkers that differed significantly between patients and controls. These data are being made available to DMD researchers and clinicians to accelerate the search for new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic approaches.

          Abstract

          Serum biomarkers in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) may provide deeper insights into disease pathogenesis, suggest new therapeutic approaches, serve as acute read-outs of drug effects, and be useful as surrogate outcome measures to predict later clinical benefit. In this study a large-scale biomarker discovery was performed on serum samples from patients with DMD and age-matched healthy volunteers using a modified aptamer-based proteomics technology. Levels of 1,125 proteins were quantified in serum samples from two independent DMD cohorts: cohort 1 (The Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy–Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center), 42 patients with DMD and 28 age-matched normal volunteers; and cohort 2 (The Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group, Duchenne Natural History Study), 51 patients with DMD and 17 age-matched normal volunteers. Forty-four proteins showed significant differences that were consistent in both cohorts when comparing DMD patients and healthy volunteers at a 1% false-discovery rate, a large number of significant protein changes for such a small study. These biomarkers can be classified by known cellular processes and by age-dependent changes in protein concentration. Our findings demonstrate both the utility of this unbiased biomarker discovery approach and suggest potential new diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for ameliorating the burden of DMD and, we hope, other rare and devastating diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Nucleic Acid Ligands With Protein-like Side Chains: Modified Aptamers and Their Use as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Agents

          Limited chemical diversity of nucleic acid libraries has long been suspected to be a major constraining factor in the overall success of SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment). Despite this constraint, SELEX has enjoyed considerable success over the past quarter of a century as a result of the enormous size of starting libraries and conformational richness of nucleic acids. With judicious introduction of functional groups absent in natural nucleic acids, the “diversity gap” between nucleic acid–based ligands and protein-based ligands can be substantially bridged, to generate a new class of ligands that represent the best of both worlds. We have explored the effect of various functional groups at the 5-position of uracil and found that hydrophobic aromatic side chains have the most profound influence on the success rate of SELEX and allow the identification of ligands with very low dissociation rate constants (named Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamers or SOMAmers). Such modified nucleotides create unique intramolecular motifs and make direct contacts with proteins. Importantly, SOMAmers engage their protein targets with surfaces that have significantly more hydrophobic character compared with conventional aptamers, thereby increasing the range of epitopes that are available for binding. These improvements have enabled us to build a collection of SOMAmers to over 3,000 human proteins encompassing major families such as growth factors, cytokines, enzymes, hormones, and receptors, with additional SOMAmers aimed at pathogen and rodent proteins. Such a large and growing collection of exquisite affinity reagents expands the scope of possible applications in diagnostics and therapeutics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The clinical plasma proteome: a survey of clinical assays for proteins in plasma and serum.

            An analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for protein-based assays through 2008 reveals 109 unique protein targets in plasma or serum, as well as 62 additional tests for peptides, protein posttranslational modifications, protein complexes, autoantibodies against endogenous proteins, and blood cell proteins. A further 96 unique protein targets are assayed in plasma by laboratory-developed tests available for clinical use in the US, yielding a total of 205 proteins that include products of approximately 211 genes (excluding immunoglobulins). These tests provide quantitative measurements for approximately 1% of the human protein gene products, defining a practical clinical plasma proteome. The rate of introduction of new protein analytes has remained essentially flat over the past 15 years, averaging 1.5 new proteins per year (median of 1 per year). This rate falls far short of that needed to support projected medical needs and indicates serious deficiencies in the protein biomarker pipeline, from which no proteomics-discovered analytes have yet emerged.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Advances in human proteomics at high scale with the SOMAscan proteomics platform.

              In 1997, while still working at NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, several of us made a proteomic bet. We thought then, and continue to think, that proteomics offers a chance to identify disease-specific biomarkers and improve healthcare. However, interrogating proteins turned out to be a much harder problem than interrogating nucleic acids. Consequently, the 'omics' revolution has been fueled largely by genomics. High-scale proteomics promises to transform medicine with personalized diagnostics, prevention, and treatment. We have now reached into the human proteome to quantify more than 1000 proteins in any human matrix - serum, plasma, CSF, BAL, and also tissue extracts - with our new SOMAmer-based proteomics platform. The surprising and pleasant news is that we have made unbiased protein biomarker discovery a routine and fast exercise. The downstream implications of the platform are substantial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                9 June 2015
                26 May 2015
                26 May 2015
                : 112
                : 23
                : 7153-7158
                Affiliations
                [1] aResearch Center for Genetic Medicine, Children’s National Medical Center , Washington, DC 20012;
                [2] bSomaLogic, Inc. , Boulder, CO 80301;
                [3] cNeurology Service, Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center , Pittsburgh, PA 15240;
                [4] dUniversity of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA 15213;
                [5] eThe Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 15213;
                [6] fParent Project Muscular Dystrophy , Hackensack, NJ 07601;
                [7] gDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Davis School of Medicine , Davis, CA 95618;
                [8] hDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN 46202;
                [9] iThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, OH 45229;
                [10] jDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary , Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada T3B 6A8;
                [11] kDivision of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, CO 80045;
                [12] lDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Florida College of Medicine , Gainesville, FL 32610
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: lgold@ 123456somalogic.com .

                Contributed by Larry Gold, April 29, 2015 (sent for review March 6, 2015; reviewed by Allan Jacobson)

                Author contributions: Y.H., P.R.C., L.C., P.F., L.H., E.H., E.P.H., C.M., S.N., H.L.S., and L.G. designed research; L.C., H.G.-D., E.H., A.L., and J.K.M. performed research; Y.H., E.B., R.K.D., Y.M.K., B.M., S.N., M.N., B.S., F.S., D.S., H.L.S., S.W., and L.G. analyzed data; and Y.H., E.B., R.K.D., Y.M.K., S.N., F.S., D.S., H.L.S., and L.G. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers included: A.J., University of Massachusetts Medical School.

                Article
                201507719
                10.1073/pnas.1507719112
                4466703
                26039989
                71eb0ec7-70c9-44bb-a9b8-1b89748da5f5

                Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Education (DoED) 100000138
                Award ID: H133B031118
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Education (DoED) 100000138
                Award ID: H133B090001
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) 100000005
                Award ID: W81XWH-09-1-0592
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: UL1RR031988
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: U54HD053177
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: UL1RR024992
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: U54RR026139
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: 2U54HD053177
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: G12RR003051
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: R01AR062380
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: P50AR060836
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: R24HD050846
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: P30HD040677
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: UL1TR000075
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Applied Biological Sciences

                proteomics,muscular dystrophy,biomarkers,somascan,somamer
                proteomics, muscular dystrophy, biomarkers, somascan, somamer

                Comments

                Comment on this article