5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Visual Acuity and Size of Choroidal Neovascularization in Highly Myopic Eyes with a Dome-Shaped Macula

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          A dome-shaped macula (DSM) is an inward convexity or anterior deviation of the macular area. DSM is believed as a protective factor in maintaining visual acuity in highly myopic eyes.

          Objective

          To investigate the correlation between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and a dome-shaped macula (DSM) in highly myopic eyes.

          Methods

          In this retrospective and observational case series study, BCVA tests and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed in a total of 472 highly myopic eyes (refractive error ≥6.5 diopters or axial length ≥26.5 mm). CNV was detected by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and the CNV area was measured by ImageJ software. BCVA, central retinal thickness (CRT), and the CNV area were compared between highly myopic eyes with and without DSM.

          Results

          The data revealed 13 eyes with DSM complicated by CNV, for an estimated prevalence of 25%. The eyes with CNV in the DSM group showed worse BCVA than those in the non-DSM group (1.59 ± 0.69 and 0.63 ± 0.64, respectively, p < 0.05), and the CNV area in the DSM group was larger than that in the non-DSM group (2793.91 ± 2181.24 and 1250.71 ± 1210.36 pixels, respectively, p < 0.05). After excluding the eyes with CNV, the DSM group had better BCVA than the non-DSM group (0.33 ± 0.17 and 0.44 ± 0.48, respectively, p < 0.05); however, no significant difference was observed in the CRT of eyes with CNV between the DSM group and the non-DSM group.

          Conclusion

          These results show that DSM might be a protective mechanism for visual acuity, but its protective capability is limited. DSM eyes have better visual acuity within the protective capability. If a more powerful pathogenic factor exceeding the protective capability is present, then the eye will have more severe CNV and worse visual acuity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review.

          To summarize the epidemiology of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and their impact on vision.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Proposed classification of posterior staphylomas based on analyses of eye shape by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and wide-field fundus imaging.

            To determine the incidence and types of posterior staphylomas in eyes with pathologic myopia by analyzing the entire eye shape by 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the sclera in dome-shaped macula.

              To examine the posterior anatomic structure of eyes with dome-shaped macula using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). Retrospective observational case series. Patients with dome-shaped macula, a condition defined as convex elevation of the macula as compared with the surrounding staphylomatous region in a highly myopic eye, were identified through routine examinations using optical coherence tomography (OCT). EDI-OCT was used to examine their posterior anatomic changes. The scleral thickness was measured from the outer border of the choroid to the outer scleral border under the fovea and 3000 μm temporal to the fovea. The mean age of the 15 patients (23 eyes) was 59.3 (± 12.2) years, and the mean refractive error was -13.6 (± 5.0) diopters. The best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/15 to 20/800 (median: 20/30). Eight patients (53%) had dome-shaped macula bilaterally. The mean subfoveal scleral thickness in 23 eyes with dome-shaped macula was 570 (± 221) μm, and that in 25 eyes of 15 myopic patients with staphyloma but without dome-shaped macula was 281 (± 85) μm (P < .001) even though both groups had similar myopic refractive error. The scleral thickness 3000 μm temporal to the fovea was not different in the 2 groups. Dome-shaped macula is the result of a relative localized thickness variation of the sclera under the macula in highly myopic patients, and it cannot be categorized into any of the known types of staphyloma. This finding suggests the ocular expansion in myopia may be more complex than previously thought. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Ophthalmol
                J Ophthalmol
                joph
                Journal of Ophthalmology
                Hindawi
                2090-004X
                2090-0058
                2020
                23 November 2020
                : 2020
                : 8852156
                Affiliations
                1Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
                2Department of Ophthalmology, Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
                3Physical Examination Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
                4Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Alessandro Meduri

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-6127
                Article
                10.1155/2020/8852156
                7803161
                72f5a22f-a95f-4f1a-9ca0-760115b50e99
                Copyright © 2020 Lu Wang et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 September 2020
                : 26 October 2020
                : 29 October 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article