0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults

      ,   , , ,
      Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with serial increments of 0.5kg to a maximum of 3kg and then relaxed sequentially. Then the load-displacement curve of the heel pad during a loading-unloading cycle was plotted. Convenience sample of 33 volunteers without heel problems, aged 18 to 78 years, were divided into young (less than 40 years) and elderly (older than 60 years) groups. Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Student's t-test was used to compare the mechanical properties of the heel between these two groups. The average unloaded heel-pad thickness was 1.76+/-.20cm in the young group and 2.01+/-.24cm in the elderly group (p < .001). The average compressibility index was 53.3%+/-7.7% in the young group and 61.3%+/-5.5% in the elderly group (p < .001). Energy dissipation ratio representing shock absorbency of the heel pad, was 23.7%+/-6.9% in the young group and 35.3%+/-10% in the elderly group (p < .001). Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, and energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad were significantly increased in the elderly group, indicating loss of the elasticity of the heel pad. The loss of elasticity may be responsible for the higher incidence of heel injury in elderly individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Investigations into the fat pads of the sole of the foot: anatomy and histology.

          Anatomical, histological, and histochemical studies were performed on normal and abnormal fat pads of the sole of cadaver feet. The fat pads were found to contain a significant nerve and blood supply separate from that to the surrounding musculature and skin. Pacinian corpuscles and free nerve endings within the fat were identified. Histological analysis indicated a meshwork of fibroelastic septae arranged in a closed-cell configuration. The mechanical consequences of this organization are discussed in the context of the weightbearing role of the fat pads of the feet. Alterations seen in dysvascular or senescent feet are consistent with the hypothesis that the septal anatomy of the fat pads is central to their cushioning function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deformation characteristics of the heel region of the shod foot during a simulated heel strike: the effect of varying midsole hardness.

            Impact tests using a pendulum were performed on the shod heel region of nine subjects. Both soft- and hard-soled shoes were used. The deformations involved were calculated from the registered decelerations during impact. Thus, load-deformation cycles were recorded for various impact velocities. In contrast to in vivo force-platform recordings, peak loadings for the soft- and hard-soled conditions differed significantly (614 +/- 29 N vs 864 +/- 49 N, respectively), thus challenging the evidence for compensation at the level of the heel pad. Moreover, computation of the compression of the heel pad in the shoe showed an unexpected inverse relationship between shoe midsole hardness and degree of heel pad compression: the harder the midsole, the smaller the compression (soft shoe 7.6 +/- 0.9 mm; hard shoe 6.7 +/- 0.9 mm). This can be explained by assuming a loading rate dependent stiffness of the heel pad in the shod condition (stiffness in N.m-1 = 51.25x (loading rate in N.s-1)0.76; R2 = 0.90), determined by the visco-elastic nature of the heel pad and the spatial confinement of the heel counter of the shoe.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The mechanical properties of the heel pad in elderly adults.

              The shock absorbing characteristics of the heel pad in vivo were examined in two groups of active elderly individuals whose ages ranged between 60 and 67 years (n = 10) and between 71 and 86 years (n = 10). For comparative purposes, young adults (n = 10) aged between 17 and 30 years were also examined. A free-fall impact testing device which consisted of an instrumented shaft (mass 5 kg), accelerometer and position detection transducer was used to obtain deceleration and deformation of the heel during impact. The data were obtained from impact velocities of 0.57 m.s-1 (slow) and 0.94 m.s-1 (fast). Peak values of the deceleration and deformation, as well as the time to these peaks from onset of impact, and energy absorption were evaluated. At the slow impact velocity, no age effect was found for the parameters examined except for the energy absorption. At the fast impact velocity, there was higher peak deceleration and smaller deformation for the elderly than for the younger adults. The energy absorbed was less for the elderly than for the younger adults. It was concluded that the capacity for shock absorbency of the heel pad declines with age.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
                Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
                Elsevier BV
                00039993
                September 1998
                September 1998
                : 79
                : 9
                : 1101-1104
                Article
                10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90178-2
                9749691
                734ee57c-98f2-4762-a23e-39579fe1fd7b
                © 1998

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article