8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Careful consideration of experimental artefacts is required in order to successfully apply high-throughput 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequencing technology. Here we introduce experimental design, quality control and “denoising” approaches for sequencing low biomass specimens.

          Results

          We found that bacterial biomass is a key driver of 16S rRNA gene sequencing profiles generated from bacterial mock communities and that the use of different deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction methods [DSP Virus/Pathogen Mini Kit® (Kit-QS) and ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Kit-ZB)] and storage buffers [PrimeStore® Molecular Transport medium (Primestore) and Skim-milk, Tryptone, Glucose and Glycerol (STGG)] further influence these profiles. Kit-QS better represented hard-to-lyse bacteria from bacterial mock communities compared to Kit-ZB. Primestore storage buffer yielded lower levels of background operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from low biomass bacterial mock community controls compared to STGG. In addition to bacterial mock community controls, we used technical repeats (nasopharyngeal and induced sputum processed in duplicate, triplicate or quadruplicate) to further evaluate the effect of specimen biomass and participant age at specimen collection on resultant sequencing profiles. We observed a positive correlation ( r = 0.16) between specimen biomass and participant age at specimen collection: low biomass technical repeats (represented by < 500 16S rRNA gene copies/μl) were primarily collected at < 14 days of age. We found that low biomass technical repeats also produced higher alpha diversities ( r = − 0.28); 16S rRNA gene profiles similar to no template controls (Primestore); and reduced sequencing reproducibility. Finally, we show that the use of statistical tools for in silico contaminant identification, as implemented through the decontam package in R, provides better representations of indigenous bacteria following decontamination.

          Conclusions

          We provide insight into experimental design, quality control steps and “denoising” approaches for 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing of low biomass specimens. We highlight the need for careful assessment of DNA extraction methods and storage buffers; sequence quality and reproducibility; and in silico identification of contaminant profiles in order to avoid spurious results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample.

          The ongoing revolution in high-throughput sequencing continues to democratize the ability of small groups of investigators to map the microbial component of the biosphere. In particular, the coevolution of new sequencing platforms and new software tools allows data acquisition and analysis on an unprecedented scale. Here we report the next stage in this coevolutionary arms race, using the Illumina GAIIx platform to sequence a diverse array of 25 environmental samples and three known "mock communities" at a depth averaging 3.1 million reads per sample. We demonstrate excellent consistency in taxonomic recovery and recapture diversity patterns that were previously reported on the basis of metaanalysis of many studies from the literature (notably, the saline/nonsaline split in environmental samples and the split between host-associated and free-living communities). We also demonstrate that 2,000 Illumina single-end reads are sufficient to recapture the same relationships among samples that we observe with the full dataset. The results thus open up the possibility of conducting large-scale studies analyzing thousands of samples simultaneously to survey microbial communities at an unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome

            After more than a century of active research, the notion that the human fetal environment is sterile and that the neonate’s microbiome is acquired during and after birth was an accepted dogma. However, recent studies using molecular techniques suggest bacterial communities in the placenta, amniotic fluid, and meconium from healthy pregnancies. These findings have led many scientists to challenge the “sterile womb paradigm” and propose that microbiome acquisition instead begins in utero, an idea that would fundamentally change our understanding of gut microbiota acquisition and its role in human development. In this review, we provide a critical assessment of the evidence supporting these two opposing hypotheses, specifically as it relates to (i) anatomical, immunological, and physiological characteristics of the placenta and fetus; (ii) the research methods currently used to study microbial populations in the intrauterine environment; (iii) the fecal microbiome during the first days of life; and (iv) the generation of axenic animals and humans. Based on this analysis, we argue that the evidence in support of the “in utero colonization hypothesis” is extremely weak as it is founded almost entirely on studies that (i) used molecular approaches with an insufficient detection limit to study “low-biomass” microbial populations, (ii) lacked appropriate controls for contamination, and (iii) failed to provide evidence of bacterial viability. Most importantly, the ability to reliably derive axenic animals via cesarean sections strongly supports sterility of the fetal environment in mammals. We conclude that current scientific evidence does not support the existence of microbiomes within the healthy fetal milieu, which has implications for the development of clinical practices that prevent microbiome perturbations after birth and the establishment of future research priorities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples

              Background The advent and use of highly sensitive molecular biology techniques to explore the microbiota and microbiome in environmental and tissue samples have detected the presence of contaminating microbial DNA within reagents. These microbial DNA contaminants may distort taxonomic distributions and relative frequencies in microbial datasets, as well as contribute to erroneous interpretations and identifications. Results We herein report on the occurrence of bacterial DNA contamination within commonly used DNA extraction kits and PCR reagents and the effect of these contaminates on data interpretation. When compared to previous reports, we identified an additional 88 bacterial genera as potential contaminants of molecular biology grade reagents, bringing the total number of known contaminating microbes to 181 genera. Many of the contaminants detected are considered normal inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract and the environment and are often indistinguishable from those genuinely present in the sample. Conclusions Laboratories working on bacterial populations need to define contaminants present in all extraction kits and reagents used in the processing of DNA. Any unusual and/or unexpected findings need to be viewed as possible contamination as opposed to unique findings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13099-016-0103-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tellafiela@gmail.com
                slubbe@sun.ac.za
                kilazasmsn24@gmail.com
                elloisedutoit@gmail.com
                heather.zar@uct.ac.za
                mark.nicol@uwa.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Microbiol
                BMC Microbiol
                BMC Microbiology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2180
                12 May 2020
                12 May 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [2 ]GRID grid.11956.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2214 904X, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, , Stellenbosch University, ; Stellenbosch, South Africa
                [3 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Computational Biology Group and H3ABioNet, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [4 ]GRID grid.462080.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0436 168X, Department of Science and Laboratory Technology, , Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, ; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
                [5 ]GRID grid.415742.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2296 3850, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, , Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [6 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, SAMRC Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [7 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [8 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Biomedical Sciences, , University of Western Australia, ; Perth, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2175-3776
                Article
                1795
                10.1186/s12866-020-01795-7
                7218582
                32397992
                7364f1d7-d8f4-4714-bfc4-141b4fd6fabc
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 28 November 2019
                : 20 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000009, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: 1U01AI110466-01A1
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1017641
                Award ID: OPP1017579
                Categories
                Methodology Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Microbiology & Virology
                16s rrna gene,bacteriome,contamination,high-throughput sequencing,low biomass,mock controls,negative controls,optimization,reproducibility,respiratory

                Comments

                Comment on this article