2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lupus anticoagulant testing during anticoagulation, including direct oral anticoagulants

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are one laboratory criterion for classification of antiphospholipid syndrome, with presence of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy/fetal morbidity being clinical criteria. The presence of LA is detected (or excluded) by laboratory testing, with the activated partial thromboplastin time and dilute Russell's viper venom time the most commonly used tests. Given the association of thrombosis with LA, it is no surprise that anticoagulants are used to treat or manage such patients.

          Objectives

          To review and discuss interferences from anticoagulants on LA testing, and strategies to mitigate these.

          Methods

          This narrative review assessed interference from commonly used anticoagulants, focusing on LA testing while on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including use of DOAC neutralizers.

          Results

          The classical anticoagulants comprise vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, and heparins, predominantly unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). DOACs have emerged with favorable efficacy and safety. These comprise two classes: direct anti‐thrombin (anti‐IIa; dabigatran) or direct anti‐Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) agents. All anticoagulants affect clotting assays, although there are differences in effects according to anticoagulant and assay. Nevertheless, because of such interferences, anticoagulants can lead to false‐negative or false‐positive LA findings. Several strategies can mitigate such interferences, including avoidance of testing while patients are on such anticoagulants, temporarily switching to an anticoagulant (i.e., LMWH) with less assay interference, testing for LA at nadir levels of anticoagulants, and/or use of anticoagulant neutralizers.

          Conclusion

          Whilst the best approach is to avoid LA testing on patients taking anticoagulants; if unavoidable, testing may be facilitated by various mitigating strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

          New clinical, laboratory and experimental insights, since the 1999 publication of the Sapporo preliminary classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), had been addressed at a workshop in Sydney, Australia, before the Eleventh International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies. In this document, we appraise the existing evidence on clinical and laboratory features of APS addressed during the forum. Based on this, we propose amendments to the Sapporo criteria. We also provide definitions on features of APS that were not included in the updated criteria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

              One of the conclusions of the subcommittee meeting on Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid dependent antibodies, held in Geneva on 2007, was the need to update the guidelines on Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) detection. Particular emphasis was given to several aspects discussed in this official communication. A new paragraph is dedicated to the patient selection, and aims to minimize inappropriate requests for LA testing. Modalities for blood collection and processing are fully delineated and the choice of tests is limited to dRVVT and a sensitive aPTT. Calculation of cut-off values for each diagnostic step are clearly stated. A final paragraph reports the interpretation of the results in general and in particular situations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Emmanuel.Favaloro@health.nsw.gov.au
                Journal
                Res Pract Thromb Haemost
                Res Pract Thromb Haemost
                10.1002/(ISSN)2475-0379
                RTH2
                Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2475-0379
                15 March 2022
                February 2022
                : 6
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/rth2.v6.2 )
                : e12676
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Haematology Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR) NSW Health Pathology Westmead Hospital Westmead New South Wales Australia
                [ 2 ] Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Westmead New South Wales Australia
                [ 3 ] Faculty of Science and Health Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga New South Wales Australia
                [ 4 ] Sydney University Westmead New South Wales Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Haematology, ICPMR, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2145.

                Email: Emmanuel.Favaloro@ 123456health.nsw.gov.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2103-1661
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-6743
                Article
                RTH212676
                10.1002/rth2.12676
                8922544
                7410bea4-4b67-4263-83bd-c6152307f044
                © 2022 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 27 January 2022
                : 09 January 2022
                : 06 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 16, Words: 10462
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.03.2022

                apixaban,clinical laboratory techniques,dabigatran,direct oral anticoagulants,doacs,lupus anticoagulant,rivaroxaban

                Comments

                Comment on this article