1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.).

          MARY LYON (1961)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome.

            Many large noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate chromatin, but the mechanisms by which they localize to genomic targets remain unexplored. We investigated the localization mechanisms of the Xist lncRNA during X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), a paradigm of lncRNA-mediated chromatin regulation. During the maintenance of XCI, Xist binds broadly across the X chromosome. During initiation of XCI, Xist initially transfers to distal regions across the X chromosome that are not defined by specific sequences. Instead, Xist identifies these regions by exploiting the three-dimensional conformation of the X chromosome. Xist requires its silencing domain to spread across actively transcribed regions and thereby access the entire chromosome. These findings suggest a model in which Xist coats the X chromosome by searching in three dimensions, modifying chromosome structure, and spreading to newly accessible locations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation.

              In many higher organisms, 5%-15% of histone H2A is ubiquitylated at lysine 119 (uH2A). The function of this modification and the factors involved in its establishment, however, are unknown. Here we demonstrate that uH2A occurs on the inactive X chromosome in female mammals and that this correlates with recruitment of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins belonging to Polycomb repressor complex 1 (PRC1). Based on our observations, we tested the role of the PRC1 protein Ring1B and its closely related homolog Ring1A in H2A ubiquitylation. Analysis of Ring1B null embryonic stem (ES) cells revealed extensive depletion of global uH2A levels. On the inactive X chromosome, uH2A was maintained in Ring1A or Ring1B null cells, but not in double knockout cells, demonstrating an overlapping function for these proteins in development. These observations link H2A ubiquitylation, X inactivation, and PRC1 PcG function, suggesting an unanticipated and novel mechanism for chromatin-mediated heritable gene silencing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                The EMBO Journal
                The EMBO Journal
                EMBO
                0261-4189
                1460-2075
                December 15 2021
                November 17 2021
                December 15 2021
                : 40
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Cell Biology School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                [2 ]Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome) Monterotondo Italy
                [3 ]Blizard Institute Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK
                [4 ]Max‐Planck‐Institut fuer molekulare Genetik Berlin Germany
                Article
                10.15252/embj.2020105862
                34786738
                7419418e-bb3e-4e12-9ea2-e81067187712
                © 2021

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article