8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Removal of trace organic contaminants from wastewater by superfine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) is neither affected by SPAC dispersal nor coagulation.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Powdered activated carbon (PAC) is increasingly used as tertiary treatment for the removal of trace organic contaminants (TrOCs) from wastewater (WW). To enhance the sorption kinetics and capacity, the PAC particles can be milled down to superfine powdered activated carbon (SPAC). However, the small-grained SPAC particles are prone to aggregation, which may impact their treatment performance. In this study we examined the effect of SPAC dispersion and aggregation on TrOC removal kinetics and sorption capacity. Specifically, we assessed how two interventions that modulate the apparent size of SPAC - ultrasonication and coagulation - affect the uptake of TrOCs in secondary WW effluent. We quantified the removal of fourteen TrOCs, of which twelve are indicator substances for micropollutant removal in WWTPs as designated by the Swiss Water Protection Ordinance. We determined that at high SPAC doses (> 1.6 mgSPAC/mg Dissolved Organic Carbon [DOC]), the TrOC removal kinetics were fast even for aggregated SPAC, such that SPAC dispersal by ultrasonication yielded no benefit. At low SPAC doses (< 1.6 mgSPAC/mgDOC) and contact times (< 2 minutes) ultrasonication was beneficial, in particular if the SPAC particles reached complete dispersion prior to exposure to TrOCs. However, the energy consumption of such an ultrasonication step should be carefully weighed against the additional energy requirement associated with using a higher SPAC dose. Finally, a coagulant to mitigate membrane fouling can be added simultaneously with the SPAC without compromising the TrOC removal efficiency. We conclude that under realistic SPAC application scenarios in WWTPs, interventions that disperse SPAC during TrOC sorption are not necessary, and processes that aggregate SPAC are acceptable.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Water Res
          Water research
          Elsevier BV
          1879-2448
          0043-1354
          Oct 15 2020
          : 185
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, (ENAC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
          [2 ] Membratec SA, Sierre, Switzerland.
          [3 ] Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, (ENAC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: tamar.kohn@epfl.ch.
          Article
          S0043-1354(20)30838-1
          10.1016/j.watres.2020.116302
          32823197
          747d6ee1-a127-40c9-8808-f4ca827e86d8
          History

          Ultrasonication,Coagulation,Dispersion,Micropollutants,Tertiary treatment,Aggregation

          Comments

          Comment on this article