15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Few Disparities in Baseline Laboratory Testing Following Diuretic or Digoxin Initiation by Medicare FFS Beneficiaries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite the persistence of significant disparities, few evaluations examine disparities in laboratory testing by race/ethnicity, age, gender, Medicaid eligibility, and number of chronic conditions for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries newly prescribed medications. In Medicare beneficiaries initiating diuretics or digoxin, this study examined disparities in guideline-appropriate baseline laboratory testing and abnormal laboratory values.

          Methods and Results

          To evaluate guideline-concordant testing for serum creatinine and serum potassium within 180 days before or 14 days after the index prescription fill date, we constructed retrospective cohorts from 10 states of 99,711 beneficiaries who had heart failure or hypertension initiating a diuretic in 2011 and 8,683 beneficiaries who had heart failure or atrial fibrillation initiating digoxin. Beneficiaries initiating diuretics were less likely to have testing if they were non-Hispanic Black (relative risk (RR)=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99) than non-Hispanic White. Beneficiaries initiating diuretics and beneficiaries initiating digoxin were more likely to have testing if they had multiple chronic conditions relative to 0-1 conditions. Beneficiaries initiating diuretics with lab values were more likely to have an abnormal serum creatinine value at baseline if they were non-Hispanic Black (RR=2.57, 95% CI: 1.91, 3.44), Other race (RR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.08, 4.10), or male (RR=2.75, 95% CI: 2.14, 3.52) or an abnormal serum potassium value if they were age 76+ (RR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.51) or male (RR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.33).

          Conclusions

          Testing rates were consistently high, so there were negligible disparities in guideline-concordant testing of creatinine and potassium following initiation of digoxin or diuretics by Medicare beneficiaries.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101489148
          36518
          Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
          Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
          Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
          1941-7713
          1941-7705
          20 October 2016
          18 October 2016
          November 2016
          01 November 2017
          : 9
          : 6
          : 714-722
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
          [2 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
          [3 ]Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center
          [4 ]National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC
          [5 ]Office of Minority Health, U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Matthew L. Maciejewski, Ph.D., Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, Phone: (919) 286-0411 ext. 5198, mlm34@ 123456duke.edu
          Article
          PMC5339025 PMC5339025 5339025 hhspa816761
          10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003052
          5339025
          27756796
          74965210-e45c-43cb-94a5-a7de23f90397
          History
          Categories
          Article

          heart failure,atrial fibrillation,hypertension,disparity,multiple chronic conditions,Medicare,beneficiary,laboratory testing,diuretic,digoxin,creatinine,potassium,quality of care,safety

          Comments

          Comment on this article