8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Content Validation of a Transcultural Instrument to Assess Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation in Healthcare Organizations: The OR4KT

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Implementing effective interventions in healthcare requires organizations to be ready to support change. This study aimed to develop, adapt transculturally, and assess the content and face validity of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) tool. The OR4KT was designed to measure the readiness of healthcare organizations to implement evidence-informed change across a variety of services.

          Methods: Based on systematic reviews of the literature, a Delphi exercise, and expert consultation, we first generated an initial pool of items. Second, we developed and assessed content validity of the pilot OR4KT questionnaire in English. Third, we created French and Spanish versions using a sequential forward and backward translation approach, and transcultural adaptation by a consensus process. Finally, we conducted pilot studies in three contexts – the Basque country region (Spain), and the provinces of Québec and Ontario (Canada) – where 30 experts assessed the face validity of the three versions of OR4KT.

          Results: We selected 59 items, grouped in 6 dimensions (organizational climate, context, change content, leadership, organizational support, and motivation) for the final English version of OR4KT. Translation and transcultural adaptation did not identify any content or language problems. Our findings indicate that the English, French and Spanish versions of OR4KT are linguistically equivalents and have high face validity. Only minor revisions to the wording of some items were recommended.

          Conclusion: The OR4KT holds promise as a measure of readiness for knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare organizations. The validity and reliability of the three versions of the OR4KT will be assessed in real-life contexts of implementation of evidence-based changes in healthcare

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Creating Readiness for Organizational Change

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields.

            Health care practitioners and change experts contend that organizational readiness for change is a critical precursor to successful change implementation. This article assesses how organizational readiness for change has been defined and measured in health services research and other fields. Analysis of 106 peer-reviewed articles reveals conceptual ambiguities and disagreements in current thinking and writing about organizational readiness for change. Inspection of 43 instruments for measuring organizational readiness for change reveals limited evidence of reliability or validity for most publicly available measures. Several conceptual and methodological issues that need to be addressed to generate knowledge useful for practice are identified and discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical center.

              This paper is a report of a study to describe nurses' practices, knowledge, and attitudes related to evidence-based nursing, and the relation of perceived barriers to and facilitators of evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice has been recognized by the healthcare community as the gold standard for the provision of safe and compassionate healthcare. Barriers and facilitators for the adoption of evidence-based practice in nursing have been identified by researchers. Healthcare organizations have been challenged to foster an environment conducive to providing care based on evidence and not steeped in ritualized practice. A descriptive, cross-sectional research study was conducted in 2006-2007 with a convenience sample of 458 nurses at an academic medical center in California (response rate 44.68%). Two reliable and valid questionnaires were electronically formatted and administered using a secured website. Relationships between responses to the two instruments were examined and results compared with previously published data. Organizational barriers (lack of time and lack of nursing autonomy) were the top perceived barriers. Facilitators were learning opportunities, culture building, and availability and simplicity of resources. Statistically significant correlations were found between barriers and practice, knowledge and attitudes related to evidence-based practice. Similar barriers to the adoption of evidence-based practice have been identified internationally. Educators must work with managers to address organizational barriers and proactively support evidence-based practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                International Journal of Health Policy and Management
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                2322-5939
                September 2018
                06 March 2018
                : 7
                : 9
                : 791-797
                Affiliations
                1Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada.
                2Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
                3CRED Research Centre – École Supérieure des Affaires, Beirut, Lebanon.
                4CHEO Research Institute, Centre for Practice Changing Research Building, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
                5Better Outcomes Registry & Nerwork (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
                6Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia – Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain.
                7BioCruces Health Research Institute, Baracaldo, Spain.
                8Faculty of Nursing and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
                9Department of Family Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
                10Department of Nursing Sciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon Email: marie-pierre.gagnon@ 123456fsi.ulaval.ca
                Article
                10.15171/ijhpm.2018.17
                6186488
                30316227
                757ea978-710e-44f3-a527-c205833bd612
                © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 August 2017
                : 13 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 24, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Article

                healthcare organizations,readiness for change,knowledge translation,instrument development,transcultural validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article