For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
5
views
36
references
 Top references
cited by
1
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      122
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold-standard treatment for apical compartment prolapse, as it is more effective and durable than the transvaginal approach. In the current era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques have been described, but have not gained popularity due to their complexity and steep learning curves. To overcome this problem, robotic sacrocolpopexy was introduced, and has shown equivalent outcomes and safety compared to open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy based on findings that have been accumulated over 15 years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

          Jennifer Wu, Catherine A Matthews, Mitchell M Conover … (2014)
          To estimate the lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, or both using current, population-based surgical rates from 2007 to 2011.
          Article 0 comments Cited 188 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

            Stacie Geller, Minjie Wu, Thao N'guyen Khoa … (2007)
            To estimate hysterectomy rates by type of hysterectomy and to compare age, length of stay, and regional variation in type of hysterectomy performed for benign indications. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of national discharge data using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. These data represent a 20% stratified sample of U.S. hospitals. Women aged 16 years or older who underwent a hysterectomy were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. We extracted data regarding age, race, diagnoses codes, length of stay, and hospital characteristics. Using 2000 National Census data and weighted data analysis for cluster sampling, we calculated hysterectomy rates. In 2003, 602,457 hysterectomies were performed, for a rate of 5.38 per 1,000 women-years. Of the 538,722 hysterectomies for benign disease (rate 4.81 per 1,000 women-years), the abdominal route was the most common (66.1%), followed by vaginal (21.8%) and laparoscopic (11.8%) routes. Mean ages (+/-standard deviation) differed among hysterectomy types (abdominal 44.5+/-0.1 years, vaginal 48.2+/-0.2 years, and laparoscopic 43.6+/-0.3 years, P<.001). Mean lengths of stay (+/-standard deviation) were also different (3.0+/-0.03 days, 2.0+/-0.03 days, 1.7+/-0.03 days, respectively, P<.001). The hysterectomy rate was highest in the South (5.92 per 1,000 women-years) and lowest in the Northeast (3.33 per 1,000 women-years). Despite a shorter length of stay, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies remain far less common than abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease. III.
            Article 0 comments Cited 108 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

              Ingrid Nygaard, Linda Brubaker, Halina M. Zyczynski … (2013)
              More than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness.
              Article 0 comments Cited 87 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Int Neurourol J
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Int Neurourol J
                Journal ID (publisher-id): INJ
                Title: International Neurourology Journal
                Publisher: Korean Continence Society
                ISSN (Print): 2093-4777
                ISSN (Electronic): 2093-6931
                Publication date (Print): June 2020
                Publication date (Electronic): 30 June 2020
                Volume: 24
                Issue: 2
                Pages: 97-110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [3 ]Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Kyu-Sung Lee https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-2488 Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea E-mail: ksleedr@ 123456skku.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-1266
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-2488
                Article
                Publisher ID: inj-2040056-028
                DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040056.028
                PMC ID: 7332820
                PubMed ID: 32615671
                SO-VID: 7589c5ae-3072-4853-bd51-d7e36faed19a
                Copyright © Copyright © 2020 Korean Continence Society
                License:

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Date received : 10 February 2020
                Date accepted : 24 April 2020
                Categories
                Subject: Review Article

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Neurology
                Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse,robotics,sacrocolpopexy
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Neurology
                Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse, robotics, sacrocolpopexy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content122

                See all similar

                Cited by1

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors290

                See all reference authors