24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Silicon, endophytes and secondary metabolites as grass defenses against mammalian herbivores

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Grasses have been considered to primarily employ tolerance in lieu of defense in mitigating damage caused by herbivory. Yet a number of mechanisms have been identified in grasses, which may deter feeding by grazers. These include enhanced silicon uptake, hosting of toxin-producing endophytic fungi and induction of secondary metabolites. While these mechanisms have been individually studied, their synergistic responses to grazing, as well as their effects on grazers, are poorly known. A field experiment was carried out in 5 × 5 m outdoor enclosures to quantify phytochemical changes of either endophyte-infected (E+) or endophyte-free (E-) meadow fescue ( Schedonorus pratensis) in response to medium intensity (corresponding with densities of ca. 1200 voles/ha for 5 weeks during 3 months) or heavy intensity (ca. 1200 voles/ha for 8 weeks during 3 months) grazing by a mammalian herbivore, the field vole ( Microtus agrestis). A laboratory experiment was then conducted to evaluate the effects of endophyte infection status and grazing history of the grass diet on vole performance. As predicted, grazing increased foliar silicon content, by up to 13%. Grazing also increased foliar levels of phosphorous and several phenolic compounds, most notably those of the flavonols isorhamnetin-diglycoside and rhamnetin derivative. Silicon concentrations were consistently circa 16% higher in E+ grasses than in E-grasses, at all levels of grazing. Similarly, concentrations of chlorogenic acid derivative were found to be consistently higher in E+ than in E- grasses. Female voles maintained on heavily grazed grasses suffered higher mortality rates in the laboratory than female voles fed ungrazed grass, regardless of endophyte infection status. Our results conclusively demonstrate that, in addition to tolerance, grasses employ multi-tiered, effective defenses against mammalian grazers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants.

          Silicon (Si) accumulation differs greatly between plant species because of differences in Si uptake by the roots. Recently, a gene encoding a Si uptake transporter in rice, a typical Si-accumulating plant, was isolated. The beneficial effects of Si are mainly associated with its high deposition in plant tissues, enhancing their strength and rigidity. However, Si might play an active role in enhancing host resistance to plant diseases by stimulating defense reaction mechanisms. Because many plants are not able to accumulate Si at high enough levels to be beneficial, genetically manipulating the Si uptake capacity of the root might help plants to accumulate more Si and, hence, improve their ability to overcome biotic and abiotic stresses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES: A Continuum of Interactions with Host Plants

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses.

              Over the past 20 yr much has been learned about a unique symbiotic interaction between fungal endophytes and grasses. The fungi (Clavicipitaceae, Ascomycota) grow intercellularly and systemically in aboveground plant parts. Vertically transmitted asexual endophytes forming asymptomatic infections of cool-season grasses have been repeatedly derived from sexual species that abort host inflorescences. The phylogenetic distribution of seed-transmitted endophytes is strongly suggestive of cocladogenesis with their hosts. Molecular evidence indicates that many seed-transmitted endophytes are interspecific hybrids. Superinfection may result in hyphal fusion and parasexual recombination. Most endophytes produce one or more alkaloid classes that likely play some role in defending the host plant against pests. Hybridization may have led to the proliferation of alkaloid-production genes among asexual endophytes, favoring hybrids. The ergot alkaloid ergovaline, lolitrems, and lolines are produced by only a single sexual species, Epichloë festucae, but they are common in seed-transmitted endophytes, suggesting that E. festucae contributed genes for their synthesis. Asexual hybrids may also be favored by the counteracting of the accumulation of deleterious mutations (Muller's rachet). Endophyte infection can provide other benefits, such as enhanced drought tolerance, photosynthetic rate, and growth. Estimates of infection frequency have revealed variable levels of infection with especially high prevalence in the subfamily Pooideae. Longitudinal studies suggest that the prevalence of seed-transmitted endophytes can increase rapidly over time. In field experiments, infected tall fescue suppressed other grasses and forbs relative to uninfected fescue and supported lower consumer populations. Unlike other widespread plant/microbial symbioses based on the acquisition of mineral resources, grass/endophyte associations are based primarily on protection of the host from biotic and abiotic stresses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                17 September 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 478
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Suonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute Suonenjoki, Finland
                [2] 2Section of Ecology, University of Turku Turku, Finland
                [3] 3Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland Joensuu, Finland
                [4] 4School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK
                [5] 5Plant Protection, Agrifood Research Finland Jokioinen, Finland
                [6] 6Department of Biology, University of York York, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jane DeGabriel, University of Western Sydney, Australia

                Reviewed by: Daniel J. Ballhorn, Portland State University, USA; Caroline Stolter, University of Hamburg, Germany

                *Correspondence: Otso Huitu, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland e-mail: otso.huitu@ 123456metla.fi

                Present address: Peter Stuart, Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Sini Sulkama, Department of Molecular Neurology, University of Helsinki, Finland

                This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2014.00478
                4166226
                25278951
                75ac4aa8-0d72-49b2-8cd0-5e238d1c0f1e
                Copyright © 2014 Huitu, Forbes, Helander, Julkunen-Tiitto, Lambin, Saikkonen, Stuart, Sulkama and Hartley.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 May 2014
                : 30 August 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 10, Words: 0
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research Article

                Plant science & Botany
                defense,endophytes,grasses,grazing,phenolics,secondary metabolites,silicon,voles
                Plant science & Botany
                defense, endophytes, grasses, grazing, phenolics, secondary metabolites, silicon, voles

                Comments

                Comment on this article