10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A role for lakes in revealing the nature of animal movement using high dimensional telemetry systems

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Movement ecology is increasingly relying on experimental approaches and hypothesis testing to reveal how, when, where, why, and which animals move. Movement of megafauna is inherently interesting but many of the fundamental questions of movement ecology can be efficiently tested in study systems with high degrees of control. Lakes can be seen as microcosms for studying ecological processes and the use of high-resolution positioning systems to triangulate exact coordinates of fish, along with sensors that relay information about depth, temperature, acceleration, predation, and more, can be used to answer some of movement ecology’s most pressing questions. We describe how key questions in animal movement have been approached and how experiments can be designed to gather information about movement processes to answer questions about the physiological, genetic, and environmental drivers of movement using lakes. We submit that whole lake telemetry studies have a key role to play not only in movement ecology but more broadly in biology as key scientific arenas for knowledge advancement. New hardware for tracking aquatic animals and statistical tools for understanding the processes underlying detection data will continue to advance the potential for revealing the paradigms that govern movement and biological phenomena not just within lakes but in other realms spanning lands and oceans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references305

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch.

            Phenology, the study of annually recurring life cycle events such as the timing of migrations and flowering, can provide particularly sensitive indicators of climate change. Changes in phenology may be important to ecosystem function because the level of response to climate change may vary across functional groups and multiple trophic levels. The decoupling of phenological relationships will have important ramifications for trophic interactions, altering food-web structures and leading to eventual ecosystem-level changes. Temperate marine environments may be particularly vulnerable to these changes because the recruitment success of higher trophic levels is highly dependent on synchronization with pulsed planktonic production. Using long-term data of 66 plankton taxa during the period from 1958 to 2002, we investigated whether climate warming signals are emergent across all trophic levels and functional groups within an ecological community. Here we show that not only is the marine pelagic community responding to climate changes, but also that the level of response differs throughout the community and the seasonal cycle, leading to a mismatch between trophic levels and functional groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

              Freshwater biodiversity is the over-riding conservation priority during the International Decade for Action - 'Water for Life' - 2005 to 2015. Fresh water makes up only 0.01% of the World's water and approximately 0.8% of the Earth's surface, yet this tiny fraction of global water supports at least 100000 species out of approximately 1.8 million - almost 6% of all described species. Inland waters and freshwater biodiversity constitute a valuable natural resource, in economic, cultural, aesthetic, scientific and educational terms. Their conservation and management are critical to the interests of all humans, nations and governments. Yet this precious heritage is in crisis. Fresh waters are experiencing declines in biodiversity far greater than those in the most affected terrestrial ecosystems, and if trends in human demands for water remain unaltered and species losses continue at current rates, the opportunity to conserve much of the remaining biodiversity in fresh water will vanish before the 'Water for Life' decade ends in 2015. Why is this so, and what is being done about it? This article explores the special features of freshwater habitats and the biodiversity they support that makes them especially vulnerable to human activities. We document threats to global freshwater biodiversity under five headings: overexploitation; water pollution; flow modification; destruction or degradation of habitat; and invasion by exotic species. Their combined and interacting influences have resulted in population declines and range reduction of freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Conservation of biodiversity is complicated by the landscape position of rivers and wetlands as 'receivers' of land-use effluents, and the problems posed by endemism and thus non-substitutability. In addition, in many parts of the world, fresh water is subject to severe competition among multiple human stakeholders. Protection of freshwater biodiversity is perhaps the ultimate conservation challenge because it is influenced by the upstream drainage network, the surrounding land, the riparian zone, and - in the case of migrating aquatic fauna - downstream reaches. Such prerequisites are hardly ever met. Immediate action is needed where opportunities exist to set aside intact lake and river ecosystems within large protected areas. For most of the global land surface, trade-offs between conservation of freshwater biodiversity and human use of ecosystem goods and services are necessary. We advocate continuing attempts to check species loss but, in many situations, urge adoption of a compromise position of management for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning and resilience, and human livelihoods in order to provide a viable long-term basis for freshwater conservation. Recognition of this need will require adoption of a new paradigm for biodiversity protection and freshwater ecosystem management - one that has been appropriately termed 'reconciliation ecology'.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                robertlennox9@gmail.com
                Journal
                Mov Ecol
                Mov Ecol
                Movement Ecology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2051-3933
                28 July 2021
                28 July 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.509009.5, Laboratory for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (LFI) at NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, ; Nygårdsporten 112, 5008 Bergen, Norway
                [2 ]GRID grid.5399.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2176 4817, INRAE, Aix Marseille Univ, Pôle R&D ECLA, RECOVER, ; 3275 Route de Cézanne - CS 40061, 13182 Cedex 5 Aix-en-Provence, France
                [3 ]GRID grid.418338.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2255 8513, Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, ; České Budějovice, Czech Republic
                [4 ]GRID grid.9619.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0538, Movement Ecology Lab, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, , Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, ; 102 Berman Bldg, Edmond J. Safra Campus at Givat Ram, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel
                [5 ]GRID grid.8756.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 314X, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, , University of Glasgow, ; Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.14509.39, ISNI 0000 0001 2166 4904, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecosystem Biology, , University of South Bohemia, ; České Budějovice, Czech Republic
                [7 ]GRID grid.420127.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 519X, Norwegian Institute of Nature Research, ; Tromsø, Norway
                [8 ]GRID grid.267455.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9596, University of Windsor, ; Windsor, ON Canada
                [9 ]GRID grid.6341.0, ISNI 0000 0000 8578 2742, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, , Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [10 ]GRID grid.20258.3d, ISNI 0000 0001 0721 1351, Karlstads University, ; Universitetsgatan 2, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden
                [11 ]GRID grid.34428.39, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 893X, Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, , Carleton University, ; Ottawa, ON Canada
                [12 ]Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
                [13 ]GRID grid.5170.3, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 8870, Technical University of Denmark, ; Vejlsøvej 39, Building Silkeborg-039, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
                [14 ]GRID grid.7491.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0944 9128, Bielefeld University, ; Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
                [15 ]GRID grid.419247.d, ISNI 0000 0001 2108 8097, Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, ; Bergen, Germany
                [16 ]GRID grid.7468.d, ISNI 0000 0001 2248 7639, Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ; Bergen, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-0577
                Article
                244
                10.1186/s40462-021-00244-y
                8320048
                34321114
                765e84e6-2176-4cc2-b7b1-fcde9d9c3f6d
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 11 February 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Alter-net
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                telemetry,sensor,biologging,movement ecology,fish ecology
                telemetry, sensor, biologging, movement ecology, fish ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article