1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dual vs. mono antiplatelet therapy for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with evidence of large artery atherosclerosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and purpose

          Current pieces of evidence support the short-term use of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) in minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) based on the studies performed in patients with a broad range of non-cardioembolic stroke mechanisms. However, the efficacy and safety of DAPT use in ischemic stroke patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) are still uncertain. We undertook a systemic search and formal meta-analysis to compare DAPT vs. mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) in patients with etiology specifically presumed to be symptomatic LAA.

          Methods

          We conducted a systemic online search for completed randomized controlled trials that (1) compared DAPT vs. MAPT in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA, and (2) were confined to or had available subgroup data regarding population with symptomatic extra- or intracranial artery stenosis. Study-level meta-analysis was performed for outcomes, including ischemic stroke (IS) recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and major bleeding with the Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect models, and was described as risk difference (RD) and 95% CI.

          Results

          A total of 10 trials including 5,004 patients were pooled. Comparing to MAPT, DAPT significantly reduced IS recurrence (5.99 vs. 9.55%, RD: −3%, 95% CI: −5 0%). Across all agents, out of 100 treated patients, 3 fewer had a recurrent ischemic stroke with DAPT. The safety endpoints including ICH (0.28 vs. 0.32%, RD: 0%, 95% CI: −0 0%) and major bleeding (0.73 vs. 0.51%, RD: 0%, 95% CI: −0 0%) did not differ significantly.

          Conclusion

          In patients with symptomatic large artery extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis, DAPT was superior to MAPT in preventing IS recurrence without increasing bleeding risks. The optimal DAPT regimens and duration of treatment in this population need to be clarified in further studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.

              Stroke is common during the first few weeks after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke. Combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin may provide greater protection against subsequent stroke than aspirin alone. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 114 centers in China, we randomly assigned 5170 patients within 24 hours after the onset of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA to combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin (clopidogrel at an initial dose of 300 mg, followed by 75 mg per day for 90 days, plus aspirin at a dose of 75 mg per day for the first 21 days) or to placebo plus aspirin (75 mg per day for 90 days). All participants received open-label aspirin at a clinician-determined dose of 75 to 300 mg on day 1. The primary outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) during 90 days of follow-up in an intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment differences were assessed with the use of a Cox proportional-hazards model, with study center as a random effect. Stroke occurred in 8.2% of patients in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, as compared with 11.7% of those in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.81; P<0.001). Moderate or severe hemorrhage occurred in seven patients (0.3%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in eight (0.3%) in the aspirin group (P=0.73); the rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.3% in each group. Among patients with TIA or minor stroke who can be treated within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is superior to aspirin alone for reducing the risk of stroke in the first 90 days and does not increase the risk of hemorrhage. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; CHANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00979589.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                12 September 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 923142
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital , Taipei, Taiwan
                [2] 2School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University , Taipei, Taiwan
                [3] 3Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital , New Taipei, Taiwan
                [4] 4Comprehensive Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Zilong Hao, Sichuan University, China

                Reviewed by: Steve M. Cordina, University of South Alabama, United States; Hui Xia, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, China

                *Correspondence: Chun-Jen Lin zenlin1981@ 123456hotmail.com

                This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2022.923142
                9510375
                36172029
                77d74e51-6863-44ce-a9ac-da3ff012f82d
                Copyright © 2022 Lin, Tseng and Saver.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 April 2022
                : 29 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 28, Pages: 09, Words: 4828
                Funding
                Funded by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, doi 10.13039/501100011912;
                Award ID: V110B-026
                Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, doi 10.13039/501100004663;
                Award ID: MOST 110-2314-B-075-043
                Categories
                Neurology
                Original Research

                Neurology
                dual antiplatelet therapy,large artery atherosclerosis (laa),ischemic stroke,meta-analysis,clopidogrel,cilostazol,ticagrelor

                Comments

                Comment on this article