5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      APOE ε4 is associated with younger age at ischemic stroke onset but not with stroke outcome

      brief-report
      , MD , , MSc, , PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, MSc, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, MMSc, , MD, MPH, , MD, PhD, , MD, MSc, , RN, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, on behalf of the Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome (GISCOME) network and the International Stroke Genetics Consortium
      Neurology
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stroke outcome is determined by a complex interplay, where age and stroke severity are predominant predictors. Studies on hemorrhagic stroke indicate that APOE genotype is a predictor of poststroke outcomes, 1,2 but results from studies on ischemic stroke are more conflicting. 1,3 There is 1 study suggesting an influence of APOE genotype on age at ischemic stroke onset, 4 and sex-specific effects on outcome have been reported. 5 Taken together, there is a need for larger studies on APOE and ischemic stroke outcomes with integrated information on age, severity, and sex. The 3 common APOE alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4 can be separated by a combination of 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs429358 and rs7412. Thus, associations with APOE alleles are not directly captured in a regular genome-wide association study (GWAS), where each SNP is investigated separately. We derived the 3 common APOE alleles and investigated the interplay between APOE, age at ischemic stroke onset, severity, sex, and outcome within a large international collaboration, the Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome (GISCOME) network. Methods The design and results of the first GWAS on ischemic stroke outcome within GISCOME have been reported, 6 and the present study comprises the 6,165 cases included in this GWAS. Each center individually obtained ethical approval and participant consent. Baseline stroke severity was assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale and 3-month functional outcome by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Genotyping was performed with SNP arrays with subsequent imputation to the 1000 Genomes Phase 3 reference panel as described. 6 In the present study, we investigated effects of APOE minor alleles ε4 and ε2 separately in comparison to the most common allele ε3. To this end, ε4 allele count was defined as the continuous imputed minor allele dosage of rs429358(C), excluding samples with minor allele dosage >0.4 for rs7412(T), and vice versa for ε2, as depicted in figure, A. Each cohort was analyzed separately, and for each analysis, cohorts with an effective number of minor alleles ≤5 or an extreme effect size (β > 100) were excluded. Results from the remaining cohorts were meta-analyzed using inverse variance-weighted fixed effects, unless there were signs of heterogeneity (p heterogeneity ≤ 0.05) in which case random effects were used. Figure APOE allele distribution and associations with age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity, and outcome (A) Distribution of APOE alleles according to the SNPs rs429358 and rs7412. As the allele counts are inferred from imputation, they are given as a continuum between homozygosity for the major allele and homozygosity for the minor allele, with slightly shifted positions to improve clarity in the graph. In the analyses of ε4 vs ε3, 5,325 cases were included, and 4,519 cases were included in the analyses of ε2 vs ε3. Red positions correspond to cases excluded from both analyses. (B and D) Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) displaying associations between APOE allele count and age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale score), and dichotomized 3-month mRS score (mRS score 0–2 vs 3–6). N indicates number of cases with nonmissing information, except for APOE allele count where N refers to maximum number of cases included in the analysis, that is, cases with allele dosage ≤0.4 for rs7412(T) for ε4 vs ε3 and ≤0.4 for rs429358(C) for ε2 vs ε3. Figure, B examines associations with ε4 allele count and includes both sexes, whereas figure, D displays associations with ε2 allele count in men only. Associations are reported in the squared text boxes as β and p value derived from linear regression for associations with age and stroke severity, and OR and p value derived from logistic regression for associations with poor outcome (mRS score > 2). Adjustments are indicated in the parentheses as follows: PC, adjusted for ancestry (the 5 first principal components); A, age adjusted; S, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale) adjusted. *Refers to result from random effects meta-analysis. Arrow thickness illustrates standardized effect size after the full adjustment specified in the respective text box. Arrow color refers to the direction of the effect. A dotted arrow indicates a nonsignificant association. (C) Bubble chart showing median age at ischemic stroke onset and ε4 allele frequency for individual cohorts in GISCOME. The cohorts are described in Söderholm et al. 6 Bubble diameter is proportional to the number of cases. Bubble color refers to the effect size (β) of ε4 on age at stroke onset derived from linear regression. GISCOME = Genetics of Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; OR = odds ratio; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism. We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to investigate associations between APOE, age at stroke onset, stroke severity, and outcome. A DAG illustrates associations between variables according to a definite direction of causality as depicted by the arrows connecting the variables. For instance, APOE can influence age at stroke onset and/or stroke severity, but reverse causality is unlikely as APOE genotype is determined at conception. As age and stroke severity are well-established predictors of stroke outcome, we aimed to account for both possible direct effects of APOE on outcome and/or indirect effects via associations with age and/or stroke severity as depicted by the 3 different arrows originating from APOE in figures, B and D. All genetic analyses were adjusted for ancestry (the 5 first principal components), and adjustments for age and stroke severity were made as indicated (figure, B and D). Prespecified sex-stratified analyses were performed. Associations between allele count, age, and stroke severity were analyzed by linear regression. Associations with outcome were analyzed with logistic (dichotomized mRS score 0–2 vs 3–6) and ordinal logistic regression. Results Increasing allele count of ε4 was associated with younger age at stroke onset (β −1.8, p < 0.001, figure, B). This association was consistent across a majority of cohorts (figure, C), significant in both sexes and in cases with first-ever stroke only (data not shown). There was an association between ε4 allele count and favorable outcome (mRS score ≤2) when adjusting only for ancestry, but this association was no longer retained after additional adjustment for age and stoke severity (figure, B). For ε2 allele count, we found a direct association with poor outcome (mRS score >2) in men after adjustment for ancestry, age, and stroke severity (figure, D). No such association was detected in the whole sample or in women. Neither ε4 nor ε2 allele count showed association with stroke severity. Discussion This is the largest meta-analysis with combined information on common APOE alleles, age at ischemic stroke onset, severity, and outcome to our knowledge. We found that increasing ε4 allele count was associated with younger age at stroke onset, which is in line with a previous meta-analysis of candidate gene studies. 4 However, we found no evidence of a direct effect of ε4 on outcome, similar to 1 recent candidate gene study (N = 786) 7 and 1 meta-analysis (N = 1,453). 1 Future studies should elucidate the biological mechanisms behind the association between APOE ε4 allele count and younger age at ischemic stroke onset. However, possible mechanisms include effects of altered lipid metabolism. In a pooled analysis, where associations between APOE genotype and several biomarkers were investigated, there was an apparent dose-response segregation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations by APOE genotype, with the highest values in subjects homozygote for the APOE ε4 allele. 8 Furthermore, the same ordering was observed for increasing carotid intima-media thickness and risk of ischemic stroke. 8 In the sex-stratified analysis, we found an association between increasing ε2 allele count and poor outcome in men. Sex-specific effects of APOE on ischemic stroke outcome have been reported 5 and are not unreasonable to assume from a cardiovascular viewpoint. The ε2 allele has been associated with increasing white matter disease (WMD) in patients with ischemic stroke, 9 and WMD is in turn associated with poor stroke outcome. Our results might thus be related to a higher prevalence of WMD in male ε2 carriers. However, as we lacked data on WMD for all participants, this hypothesis remains speculative. The GISCOME study has the advantage of being the largest sample of genetic and ischemic stroke outcome data available. Study limitations have been previously discussed. 6 In addition, the sample size for the sex-stratified analyses in our present study was small, and we used imputed values from SNP arrays to establish common APOE alleles. However, imputation based on the 1000 Genomes reference panel has been reported reliable in inferring these APOE alleles. 10 In conclusion, this study shows that APOE ε4 carriers have a younger age at ischemic stroke onset. We also detected worse functional outcome in male ε2 carriers, a result needing replication. Given these findings, even larger studies would be of interest to investigate associations between APOE alleles and ischemic stroke outcomes in different age and sex strata.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Apolipoprotein E genotype, cardiovascular biomarkers and risk of stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 015 stroke cases and pooled analysis of primary biomarker data from up to 60 883 individuals

          At the APOE gene, encoding apolipoprotein E, genotypes of the ε2/ε3/ε4 alleles associated with higher LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are also associated with higher coronary risk. However, the association of APOE genotype with other cardiovascular biomarkers and risk of ischaemic stroke is less clear. We evaluated the association of APOE genotype with risk of ischaemic stroke and assessed whether the observed effect was consistent with the effects of APOE genotype on LDL-C or other lipids and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished studies reporting on APOE genotype and ischaemic stroke. We pooled 41 studies (with a total of 9027 cases and 61,730 controls) using a Bayesian meta-analysis to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for ischaemic stroke with APOE genotype. To better evaluate potential mechanisms for any observed effect, we also conducted a pooled analysis of primary data using 16 studies (up to 60,883 individuals) of European ancestry. We evaluated the association of APOE genotype with lipids, other circulating biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT). The ORs for association of APOE genotypes with ischaemic stroke were: 1.09 (95% credible intervals (CrI): 0.84-1.43) for ε2/ε2; 0.85 (95% CrI: 0.78-0.92) for ε2/ε3; 1.05 (95% CrI: 0.89-1.24) for ε2/ε4; 1.05 (95% CrI: 0.99-1.12) for ε3/ε4; and 1.12 (95% CrI: 0.94-1.33) for ε4/ε4 using the ε3/ε3 genotype as the reference group. A regression analysis that investigated the effect of LDL-C (using APOE as the instrument) on ischaemic stroke showed a positive dose-response association with an OR of 1.33 (95% CrI: 1.17, 1.52) per 1 mmol/l increase in LDL-C. In the separate pooled analysis, APOE genotype was linearly and positively associated with levels of LDL-C (P-trend: 2 × 10(-152)), apolipoprotein B (P-trend: 8.7 × 10(-06)) and C-IMT (P-trend: 0.001), and negatively and linearly associated with apolipoprotein E (P-trend: 6 × 10(-26)) and HDL-C (P-trend: 1.6 × 10(-12)). Associations with lipoprotein(a), C-reactive protein and triglycerides were non-linear. In people of European ancestry, APOE genotype showed a positive dose-response association with LDL-C, C-IMT and ischaemic stroke. However, the association of APOE ε2/ε2 genotype with ischaemic stroke requires further investigation. This cross-domain concordance supports a causal role of LDL-C on ischaemic stroke.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            APOE genotype and extent of bleeding and outcome in lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: a genetic association study.

            Carriers of APOE ε2 and ε4 have an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in lobar regions, presumably because of the effects of these gene variants on risk of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We aimed to assess whether these variants also associate with severity of ICH, in terms of haematoma volume at presentation and subsequent outcome. We investigated the association of APOE ε2 and ε4 with ICH volume and outcomes in patients with primary ICH in three phases: a discovery phase of 865 individuals of European ancestry from the Genetics of Cerebral Hemorrhage on Anticoagulation study, and replication phases of 946 Europeans (replication 1) and 214 African-Americans (replication 2) from an additional six studies. We also assessed the association of APOE variants with ICH volume and outcomes in meta-analyses of results from all three phases, and the association of APOE ε4 with mortality in a further meta-analysis including data from previous reports. Admission ICH volume was quantified on CT scan. We assessed functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score 3-6) and mortality at 90 days. We used linear regression to establish the effect of genotype on haematoma volume and logistic regression to assess the effect on outcome from ICH. For patients with lobar ICH, carriers of the APOE ε2 allele had larger ICH volumes than did non-carriers in the discovery phase (p=2·5×10(-5)), in both replication phases (p=0·008 in Europeans and p=0·016 in African-Americans), and in the meta-analysis (p=3·2×10(-8)). In the meta-analysis, each copy of APOE ε2 increased haematoma size by a mean of 5·3 mL (95% CI 4·7-5·9; p=0·004). Carriers of APOE ε2 had increased mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1·50, 95% CI 1·23-1·82; p=2·45×10(-5)) and poorer functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale score 3-6; 1·52, 1·25-1·85; p=1·74×10(-5)) compared with non-carriers after lobar ICH. APOE ε4 was not associated with lobar ICH volume, functional outcome, or mortality in the discovery phase, replication phases, or meta-analysis of these three phases; in our further meta-analysis of 2194 patients, this variant did not increase risk of mortality (1·08, 0·86-1·36; p=0·52). APOE allele variants were not associated with deep ICH volume, functional outcome, or mortality. Vasculopathic changes associated with the APOE ε2 allele might have a role in the severity and clinical course of lobar ICH. Screening of patients who have ICH to identify the ε2 variant might allow identification of those at increased risk of mortality and poor functional outcomes. US National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Keane Stroke Genetics Research Fund, Edward and Maybeth Sonn Research Fund, and US National Center for Research Resources. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Genome-wide association meta-analysis of functional outcome after ischemic stroke

              Objective To discover common genetic variants associated with poststroke outcomes using a genome-wide association (GWA) study. Methods The study comprised 6,165 patients with ischemic stroke from 12 studies in Europe, the United States, and Australia included in the GISCOME (Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome) network. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score after 60 to 190 days, evaluated as 2 dichotomous variables (0–2 vs 3–6 and 0–1 vs 2–6) and subsequently as an ordinal variable. GWA analyses were performed in each study independently and results were meta-analyzed. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale score), and ancestry. The significance level was p < 5 × 10−8. Results We identified one genetic variant associated with functional outcome with genome-wide significance (modified Rankin Scale scores 0–2 vs 3–6, p = 5.3 × 10−9). This intronic variant (rs1842681) in the LOC105372028 gene is a previously reported trans-expression quantitative trait locus for PPP1R21, which encodes a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 1. This ubiquitous phosphatase is implicated in brain functions such as brain plasticity. Several variants detected in this study demonstrated suggestive association with outcome (p < 10−5), some of which are within or near genes with experimental evidence of influence on ischemic stroke volume and/or brain recovery (e.g., NTN4, TEK, and PTCH1). Conclusions In this large GWA study on functional outcome after ischemic stroke, we report one significant variant and several variants with suggestive association to outcome 3 months after stroke onset with plausible mechanistic links to poststroke recovery. Future replication studies and exploration of potential functional mechanisms for identified genetic variants are warranted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                neurology
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                05 November 2019
                05 November 2019
                : 93
                : 19
                : 849-853
                Affiliations
                From the Department of Laboratory Medicine (C.L., T.M.S., A.P., C.J.), Institute of Biomedicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics (C.L., A.P., C.J.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Bioinformatics Core Facility (E.L.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund (M.S., A.L.), Neurology, Lund University, Sweden; Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine (M.S.), Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Neurology (J.W.C.), Baltimore VA Medical Center and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (K.J.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience (K.J.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Neurosciences (R.L.), Experimental Neurology, KU Leuven—University of Leuven; VIB—Center for Brain & Disease Research (R.L.); Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurology (C.-L.P.), Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis; J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center (N.S.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Stroke Division (V.T.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation (D.W.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Faculty of Health (J.M.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Centre (J.M.M.), Newcastle, Australia; and Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine (A.L.), Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Lagging cecilia.lagging@ 123456gu.se

                Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome (GISCOME) network coinvestigators are listed in appendix 2 at the end of the article.

                The Article Processing Charge was funded by the Swedish Research Council.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-8417
                Article
                NEUROLOGY2019985788 00016
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000008459
                6946482
                31619479
                77db1184-28e1-4f9f-992a-9bf7b3d828aa
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 April 2019
                : 15 August 2019
                Categories
                Clinical/Scientific Notes
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article