4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Willingness to Use Safe Consumption Spaces among Opioid Users at High Risk of Fentanyl Overdose in Baltimore, Providence, and Boston

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Safe consumption spaces (SCS) are evidence-based interventions that reduce drug-related morbidity and mortality operating in many countries. However, SCS are yet to be widely implemented in the USA despite the escalating overdose epidemic. The aim of this multi-city study was to identify the factors associated with willingness to use a SCS among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Baltimore, Providence, and Boston, stratified by injection drug use status. Our secondary aim was to characterize the anticipated barriers to accessing SCS if they were to be implemented in these cities. PWUD were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey in 2017. The analysis was restricted to 326 opioid users (i.e., heroin, fentanyl, and non-medical opioid pill use). The majority (77%) of participants expressed willingness to use a SCS (Baltimore, 78%; Providence, 68%; Boston. 84%). Most respondents were male (59%), older than 35 years (76%), non-white (64%), relied on public/semi-public settings to inject (60%), had a history of overdose (64%), and recently suspected fentanyl contamination of their drugs (73%). A quarter (26%) preferred drugs containing fentanyl. Among injectors, female gender, racial minority status, suspicion of drugs containing fentanyl, and drug use in public/semi-public settings were associated with higher willingness to use a SCS; prior arrest was associated with lower willingness. Among non-injectors, racial minority status, preference for fentanyl, and drug use in public/semi-public settings were associated with higher willingness, whereas recent overdose held a negative association. The most commonly anticipated barriers to accessing a SCS in the future were concerns around arrest (38%), privacy (34%), confidentiality/trust/safety (25%), and cost/time/transportation (16%). These data provide evidence of high SCS acceptability among high-risk PWUD in the USA, including those who prefer street fentanyl. As SCS are implemented in the USA, targeted engagement efforts may be required to reach individuals exposed to the criminal justice system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users.

          There is increasing appreciation of the need to understand how social and structural factors shape HIV risk. Drawing on a review of recently published literature, we seek to describe the social structural production of HIV risk associated with injecting drug use. We adopt an inclusive definition of the HIV 'risk environment' as the space, whether social or physical, in which a variety of factors exogenous to the individual interact to increase vulnerability to HIV. We identify the following factors as critical in the social structural production of HIV risk associated with drug injecting: cross-border trade and transport links; population movement and mixing; urban or neighbourhood deprivation and disadvantage; specific injecting environments (including shooting galleries and prisons); the role of peer groups and social networks; the relevance of 'social capital' at the level of networks, communities and neighbourhoods; the role of macro-social change and political or economic transition; political, social and economic inequities in relation to ethnicity, gender and sexuality; the role of social stigma and discrimination in reproducing inequity and vulnerability; the role of policies, laws and policing; and the role of complex emergencies such as armed conflict and natural disasters. We argue that the HIV risk environment is a product of interplay in which social and structural factors intermingle but where political-economic factors may play a predominant role. We therefore emphasise that much of the most needed 'structural HIV prevention' is unavoidably political in that it calls for community actions and structural changes within a broad framework concerned to alleviate inequity in health, welfare and human rights.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America's first medically supervised safer injecting facility: a retrospective population-based study.

            Overdose from illicit drugs is a leading cause of premature mortality in North America. Internationally, more than 65 supervised injecting facilities (SIFs), where drug users can inject pre-obtained illicit drugs, have been opened as part of various strategies to reduce the harms associated with drug use. We sought to determine whether the opening of an SIF in Vancouver, BC, Canada, was associated with a reduction in overdose mortality. We examined population-based overdose mortality rates for the period before (Jan 1, 2001, to Sept 20, 2003) and after (Sept 21, 2003, to Dec 31, 2005) the opening of the Vancouver SIF. The location of death was determined from provincial coroner records. We compared overdose fatality rates within an a priori specified 500 m radius of the SIF and for the rest of the city. Of 290 decedents, 229 (79·0%) were male, and the median age at death was 40 years (IQR 32-48 years). A third (89, 30·7%) of deaths occurred in city blocks within 500 m of the SIF. The fatal overdose rate in this area decreased by 35·0% after the opening of the SIF, from 253·8 to 165·1 deaths per 100,000 person-years (p=0·048). By contrast, during the same period, the fatal overdose rate in the rest of the city decreased by only 9·3%, from 7·6 to 6·9 deaths per 100,000 person-years (p=0·490). There was a significant interaction of rate differences across strata (p=0·049). SIFs should be considered where injection drug use is prevalent, particularly in areas with high densities of overdose. Vancouver Coastal Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Deaths Involving Fentanyl, Fentanyl Analogs, and U-47700 — 10 States, July–December 2016

              Preliminary estimates of U.S. drug overdose deaths exceeded 60,000 in 2016 and were partially driven by a fivefold increase in overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids (excluding methadone), from 3,105 in 2013 to approximately 20,000 in 2016 ( 1 , 2 ). Illicitly manufactured fentanyl, a synthetic opioid 50–100 times more potent than morphine, is primarily responsible for this rapid increase ( 3 , 4 ). In addition, fentanyl analogs such as acetylfentanyl, furanylfentanyl, and carfentanil are being detected increasingly in overdose deaths ( 5 , 6 ) and the illicit opioid drug supply ( 7 ). Carfentanil is estimated to be 10,000 times more potent than morphine ( 8 ). Estimates of the potency of acetylfentanyl and furanylfentanyl vary but suggest that they are less potent than fentanyl ( 9 ). Estimates of relative potency have some uncertainty because illicit fentanyl analog potency has not been evaluated in humans. This report describes opioid overdose deaths during July–December 2016 that tested positive for fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, or U-47700, an illicit synthetic opioid, in 10 states participating in CDC’s Enhanced State Opioid Overdose Surveillance (ESOOS) program.* Fentanyl analogs are similar in chemical structure to fentanyl but not routinely detected because specialized toxicology testing is required. Fentanyl was detected in at least half of opioid overdose deaths in seven of 10 states, and 57% of fentanyl-involved deaths also tested positive for other illicit drugs, such as heroin. Fentanyl analogs were present in >10% of opioid overdose deaths in four states, with carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl identified most frequently. Expanded surveillance for opioid overdoses, including testing for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, assists in tracking the rapidly changing illicit opioid market and informing innovative interventions designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The 10 states † reporting data abstracted information from preliminary death certificates and medical examiner/coroner reports on unintentional and undetermined opioid overdose deaths using standard definitions for variables. Data were entered into the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS), the component of ESOOS designed for tracking fatal opioid overdoses. § For each death, available data on demographic characteristics, circumstances of the overdose collected from death scene investigations (e.g., evidence of illicit drug use), and results of forensic toxicology testing were entered into SUDORS. Opioid overdose deaths occurring during July–December 2016 with positive test results for fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and U-47700 in 10 states are described, and key demographic and overdose circumstance factors are stratified by substance. Full toxicology findings of decedents were reviewed, including the presence of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Because heroin involvement in overdose deaths is difficult to distinguish from prescription morphine, deaths in which heroin was confirmed by toxicologic findings were combined with deaths in which heroin was suspected because morphine was detected and death scene evidence suggested heroin use. ¶ The use of medical examiner/coroner reports, previously unavailable across states, provides unique insights into specific substances and circumstances associated with overdoses, which can inform interventions. Fentanyl was detected in 56.3% of 5,152 opioid overdose deaths in the 10 states during July–December 2016 (Figure). Among these 2,903 fentanyl-positive deaths, fentanyl was determined to be a cause of death by the medical examiner or coroner in nearly all (97.1%) of the deaths. Northeastern states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island) and Missouri** reported the highest percentages of opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl (approximately 60%–90%), followed by Midwestern and Southern states (Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin), where approximately 30%–55% of decedents tested positive for fentanyl. New Mexico and Oklahoma reported the lowest percentage of fentanyl-involved deaths (approximately 15%–25%). In contrast, states detecting any fentanyl analogs in >10% of opioid overdose deaths were spread across the Northeast (Maine, 28.6%, New Hampshire, 12.2%), Midwest (Ohio, 26.0%), and South (West Virginia, 20.1%) (Figure) (Table 1). FIGURE Percentage of opioid overdose deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, by state — 10 states, July–December 2016 The figure above is a bar chart showing the percentage of opioid overdose deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs in 10 states, during July–December 2016. TABLE 1 Number and percentage of opioid overdose decedents testing positive for fentanyl analogs and U-47700 — 10 states, July–December 2016 State Total opioid overdose deaths Any fentanyl analog present* No. (%) Fentanyl analogs U-47700 synthetic opioid No. (%) Carfentanil No. (%) Furanylfentanyl No. (%) Acetylfentanyl No. (%) Other† No. (%) Total§ 5,152 720 (14.0) 389 (7.6) 182 (3.5) 147 (2.9) 74 (1.4) 40 (0.8) Maine 154 44 (28.6) 0 25 (16.2) 17 (11.0) 5 (3.3) — Massachusetts 1,071 17 (1.6) 0 10 (0.9) —¶ — — New Hampshire 131 16 (12.2) 0 — 13 (9.9) 0 — New Mexico 166 11 (6.6) 0 — 7 (4.2) 0 — Ohio 2,043 531 (26.0) 354 (17.3) 85 (4.2) 91 (4.5) 40 (2.0) 15 (0.7) West Virginia 393 79 (20.1) 35 (8.9) 44 (11.2) 6 (1.5) 23 (5.9) 7 (1.8) Wisconsin 413 14 (3.4) 0 6 (1.5) 5 (1.2) — 5 (1.2) Other three states** 781 8 (1.0) 0 — — — — * Individual fentanyl analog deaths might sum to a number greater than the number of deaths with any fentanyl analog present because more than one fentanyl analog could be present in an opioid overdose death. † Includes 3-methylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl (or 4-fluorofentanyl), para-fluorobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl), and para-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl). § Data from 10 states included in the total numbers; individual states presented if five or more deaths tested positive for any fentanyl analog. ¶ Five or more deaths tested positive for acetylfentanyl in Massachusetts, but the number was suppressed to prevent calculation of number for other states, which was less than five. ** Missouri (22 counties), Oklahoma, and Rhode Island. Fentanyl analogs were present in 720 (14.0%) opioid overdose deaths, with the most common being carfentanil (389 deaths, 7.6%), furanylfentanyl (182, 3.5%), and acetylfentanyl (147, 2.9%) (Table 1). Fentanyl analogs contributed to death in 535 of the 573 (93.4%) decedents. Cause of death was not available for fentanyl analogs in 147 deaths. †† Five or more deaths involving carfentanil occurred in two states (Ohio and West Virginia), furanylfentanyl in five states (Maine, Massachusetts, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin), and acetylfentanyl in seven states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin). U-47700 was present in 0.8% of deaths and found in five or more deaths only in Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (Table 1). Demographic characteristics of decedents were similar among overdose deaths involving fentanyl analogs and fentanyl (Table 2). Most were male (71.7% fentanyl and 72.2% fentanyl analogs), non-Hispanic white (81.3% fentanyl and 83.6% fentanyl analogs), and aged 25–44 years (58.4% fentanyl and 60.0% fentanyl analogs) (Table 2). TABLE 2 Demographic characteristics and overdose circumstance factors for decedents in opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and U-47700, by substance — 10 states, July–December 2016 Characteristic Fentanyl (N = 2,903) Any fentanyl analog* (N = 720) Fentanyl analogs U-47700 synthetic opioid (N = 40) Carfentanil (N = 389) Furanylfentanyl (N = 182) Acetylfentanyl (N = 147) Other†(N = 74) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) Age group (yrs) § 15–24 276 (9.5) 63 (8.8) 31 (8.0) —¶ 15 (10.2) — — 25–34 926 (31.9) 220 (30.6) 124 (31.9) 50 (27.5) 46 (31.3) 27 (36.5) 19 (47.5) 35–44 768 (26.5) 212 (29.4) 103 (26.5) 61 (33.5) 48 (32.7) 22 (29.7) 6 (15.0) 45–54 540 (18.6) 133 (18.5) 73 (18.8) 32 (17.6) 26 (17.7) 9 (12.2) 6 (15.0) 55–64 343 (11.8) 77 (10.7) 50 (12.9) 18 (9.9) — 8 (10.8) — ≥65 47 (1.6) 15 (2.1) 8 (2.1) — — — 0 Median age (IQR) in yrs 37 (29–48) 38 (30–48) 39 (30–49) 38 (31–47) 36 (30–45) 36 (29–46) 32 (27–43) Sex Male 2,080 (71.7) 520 (72.2) 276 (71.0) 134 (73.6) 111 (75.5) 49 (66.2) 32 (80.0) Female 820 (28.2) 200 (27.8) 113 (29.0) 48 (26.4) 36 (24.5) 25 (33.8) 8 (20.0) Race and Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 2,360 (81.3) 602 (83.6) 340 (87.4) 148 (81.3) 120 (81.6) 62 (83.8) 36 (90.0) Black, non-Hispanic 274 (9.4) 75 (10.4) 42 (10.8) 17 (9.3) 9 (6.1) 9 (12.2) — Other, non-Hispanic 37 (1.3) 9 (1.3) — — — — — Hispanic 189 (6.5) 20 (2.8) — — — — 0 Other fentanyl(s) present Fentanyl or other fentanyl analog n/a 330 (45.8) 120 (30.9) 93 (51.1) 143 (97.3) 46 (62.2) 24 (60.0) Fentanyl n/a 299 (41.5) 105 (27.0) 62 (34.1) 139 (94.6) 31 (41.9) 16 (40.0) 1 fentanyl analog present** 263 (9.1) 653 (90.7) 352 (90.5) 129 (70.9) 129 (87.8) 43 (58.1) 12 (30.0) ≥2 fentanyl analogs present 36 (1.2) 67 (9.3) 37 (9.5) 53 (29.1) 18 (12.2) 31 (41.9) 6 (15.0) 4-ANPP †† 60 (2.1) 82 (11.4) — 77 (42.3) — 13 (17.6) 8 (20.0) Other illicit drugs present Any illicit drugs 1,656 (57.0) 369 (51.3) 190 (48.8) 91 (50.0) 91 (61.9) 42 (56.8) 15 (37.5) Suspected/Confirmed heroin§§ 1,132 (39.0) 250 (34.7) 123 (31.6) 60 (33.0) 75 (51.0) 26 (35.1) 11 (27.5) Cocaine 1,011 (34.8) 202 (28.1) 99 (25.4) 52 (28.6) 43 (29.3) 26 (35.1) 7 (17.5) Methamphetamine 167 (5.8) 64 (8.9) 43 (11.1) 12 (6.6) 10 (6.8) — — Evidence of injection 1,358 (46.8) 303 (42.1) 151 (38.8) 76 (41.8) 81 (55.1) 35 (47.3) 19 (47.5) No evidence of injection but evidence of other route ¶¶ 532 (18.3) 138 (19.2) 85 (21.9) 33 (18.1) 19 (12.9) 10 (13.5) 11 (27.5) Evidence of snorting 279 (52.4) 95 (68.8) 57 (67.1) 21 (63.6) 15 (78.9) 9 (90.0) 8 (72.7) Evidence of ingestion 203 (38.2) 41 (29.7) 27 (31.8) 8 (24.2) 7 (36.8) — — Evidence of smoking 95 (17.9) 25 (18.1) 16 (18.8) 7 (21.2) — — — Evidence of transdermal 35 (6.6) — — 0 — 0 0 Evidence of sublingual 6 (1.1) — — 0 0 0 0 No evidence of route 1,013 (34.9) 279 (38.8) 153 (39.3) 73 (40.1) 47 (32.0) 29 (39.2) 10 (25.0) Abbreviation: n/a = not applicable. * Individual fentanyl analog deaths might sum to a number greater than the number of deaths with any fentanyl analog present because more than one fentanyl analog could be present in an opioid overdose death. † Includes 3-methylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl (or 4-fluorofentanyl), para-fluorobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl), and para-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl). § Fewer than five persons aged ≤14 years died of an overdose that tested positive for a fentanyl analog. ¶ Data suppressed because fewer than five deaths, or suppressed to prohibit calculation of other suppressed cell. ** For fentanyl analogs, indicates no other analog present. †† Despropionylfentanyl is a fentanyl compound that can serve as a marker for illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogs because it is both a precursor and a metabolite of these illicit products (but not pharmaceutical fentanyl), while having low metabolic activity that does not contribute to overdose toxicity. Despropionylfentanyl is also known as 4-anilino-N-phenethylpiperidine, or 4-ANPP. §§ Includes decedents testing positive for heroin metabolite 6-acetylmorphine, plus decedents testing positive for morphine where there was a history of heroin use, death scene evidence of illicit drug use, or evidence of injection, and no scene evidence of prescription drug use or other evidence of prescription morphine. ¶¶ Percentage of deaths with evidence of routes of administration other than injection calculated out of the number of deaths in this row. Other illicit drugs co-occurred in 57.0% and 51.3% of deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, respectively, with cocaine and confirmed or suspected heroin detected in a substantial percentage of deaths (Table 2). Nearly half (45.8%) of deaths involving fentanyl analogs tested positive for two or more analogs or fentanyl, or both. Specifically, 30.9%, 51.1%, and 97.3% of deaths involving carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl, respectively, tested positive for fentanyl or additional fentanyl analogs. Forensic investigations found evidence of injection drug use in 46.8% and 42.1% of overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, respectively. Approximately one in five deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs had no evidence of injection drug use but did have evidence of other routes of administration. Among these deaths, snorting (52.4% fentanyl and 68.8% fentanyl analogs) and ingestion (38.2% fentanyl and 29.7% fentanyl analogs) were most common. Although rare, transdermal administration was found among deaths involving fentanyl (1.2%), likely indicating pharmaceutical fentanyl (Table 2). More than one third of deaths had no evidence of route of administration. Discussion This analysis of opioid overdose deaths in 10 states participating in the ESOOS program found that illicitly manufactured fentanyl is a key factor driving opioid overdose deaths and that fentanyl analogs are increasingly contributing to a complex illicit opioid market with significant public health implications. Previous reports have indicated that use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl mixed with heroin, with and without users’ knowledge, is driving many fentanyl overdoses, particularly east of the Mississippi River ( 3 , 4 ). Consistent with these findings, at least half of opioid overdose deaths in six of the seven participating states east of the Mississippi tested positive for fentanyl. Over half the overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs tested positive for confirmed or suspected heroin (the most commonly detected illicit substance), cocaine, or methamphetamine. This supports findings from other reports indicating that fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are commonly used with or mixed with heroin or cocaine ( 3 , 4 ). Nearly half of overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, however, did not test positive for other illicit opioids, suggesting that fentanyl and fentanyl analogs might be emerging as unique illicit products. Fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are highly potent and fast-acting synthetic compounds that can trigger rapid progression to loss of consciousness and death and thus might require immediate treatment and high doses of naloxone ( 5 ). Because of the potency of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs and the rapid onset of action, these drugs were determined by medical examiners and coroners to play a causal role in almost all fatal opioid overdoses in which they were detected. Injection, the most commonly reported route of administration in fatal overdoses, exacerbates these risks because of rapid absorption and high bioavailability. The high potency of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, however, can result in overdose even when administered via other routes. Nearly one in five deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs had evidence of snorting, ingestion, or smoking, with no evidence of injection. Multiple overdose outbreaks and law enforcement drug product submissions across the country have reported counterfeit prescription pills laced with fentanyl and fentanyl analogs ( 10 ). With few exceptions, fentanyl analogs are illicitly manufactured, because they do not have a legitimate medical use in humans. §§ The detection of fentanyl analogs in >10% of opioid overdoses in four states raises the concern that fentanyl analogs have become a part of illicit opioid markets in multiple states. The fentanyl analogs most commonly detected were carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl. Carfentanil, which is intended for sedation of large animals, is much more potent than fentanyl, whereas furanylfentanyl and acetylfentanyl are less potent ( 9 ). Carfentanil contributed to approximately 350 overdose deaths in Ohio, but was detected in only one other state (West Virginia). Because of its extreme potency, even limited circulation of carfentanil could markedly increase the number of fatal overdoses. Recent data suggest that carfentanil deaths are occurring in multiple other states, including Kentucky, which reported 10 overdose deaths involving carfentanil in the second half of 2016 (Kentucky Department of Public Health, unpublished data, 2017) and New Hampshire, which reported 10 deaths in 2017. ¶¶ Forty-six percent of SUDORS opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl analogs tested positive for fentanyl or an additional fentanyl analog, ranging from 31% for carfentanil to 97% for acetylfentanyl. The increased mixing or co-use of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and varying fentanyl analogs might contribute to increased risk for overdose because persons misusing opioids and other drugs are exposed to drug products with substantially varied potency. The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, results are limited to 10 states and therefore might not be generalizable. Second, the presence of fentanyl analogs is underestimated because commonly used toxicologic testing does not include fentanyl analogs, some fentanyl analogs are difficult to detect ( 9 ), and specialized testing for fentanyl analogs varied across states and over time. Third, the route of fentanyl and fentanyl analog administration must be interpreted cautiously because the data do not link specific drugs to routes of administration and thus the precise route of administration of fentanyl or fentanyl analogs cannot be determined in overdose deaths involving multiple substances (e.g., heroin and cocaine) and routes (e.g., injection and snorting). Fourth, the combination of deaths with toxicologic confirmation of heroin with those with detection of morphine and death scene evidence suggesting heroin use might have resulted in misclassification of some deaths. Finally, fentanyl source could not be definitively determined; however, only a small percentage of fentanyl deaths had evidence consistent with prescription fentanyl (e.g., transdermal use versus injection). Illicitly manufactured fentanyl is now a major driver of opioid overdose deaths in multiple states, with a variety of fentanyl analogs increasingly involved, if not solely implicated, in these deaths. This finding raises concern that in the near future, fentanyl analog overdose deaths might mirror the rapidly rising trajectory of fentanyl overdose deaths that began in 2013 and become a major factor in opioid overdose deaths. In response to this concern, CDC expanded ESOOS to 32 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 and added funding for all 33 recipients to improve forensic toxicologic testing of opioid overdose deaths to include capacity to test for a wider range of fentanyl analogs.*** Increased implementation of evidence-based efforts targeting persons at high risk for illicit opioid use, including increased access to medication-assisted treatment, increased availability of naloxone in sufficient doses, and other innovative intervention programs targeting this group, is needed to address a large and growing percentage of opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs. Summary What is already known about this topic? Sharp increases in opioid overdose deaths since 2013 are partly explained by the introduction of illicitly manufactured fentanyl into the heroin market. Outbreaks related to fentanyl analogs also have occurred. One fentanyl analog, carfentanil, is estimated to be 10,000 times more potent than morphine. Fentanyl analogs are not routinely detected because specialized toxicology testing is required. What is added by this report? This is the first report using toxicologic and death scene evidence across multiple states to characterize opioid overdose deaths. Fentanyl was involved in >50% of opioid overdose deaths, and >50% of deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs also tested positive for other illicit drugs. Approximately 700 deaths tested positive for fentanyl analogs, with the most common being carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl. What are the implications for public health practice? Increasing mixing or co-use of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and fentanyl analogs might contribute to increased overdose risk, because users are exposed to drug products that vary substantially in potency and that include some extremely potent products. Surveillance for opioid overdoses needs to expand to track the rapidly changing illicit opioid market. In fall 2017, CDC funded 33 jurisdictions to expand forensic toxicology testing. Increased implementation of evidence-based efforts targeting persons at high risk for using illicit opioids, including increased access to medication-assisted treatment and increased availability of naloxone, and innovative interventions are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Urban Health
                J Urban Health
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1099-3460
                1468-2869
                June 2019
                June 5 2019
                June 2019
                : 96
                : 3
                : 353-366
                Article
                10.1007/s11524-019-00365-1
                6565790
                31168735
                780a3ee2-abf9-4fa8-aab6-5acc8bfb173d
                © 2019

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article