11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical yield of serial follow-up by stress CMR in high cardiovascular risk patients

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

            BACKGROUND Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has demonstrated excellent diagnostic and prognostic value in single-center studies. OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of stress CMR and downstream costs from subsequent cardiac testing in a retrospective multicenter study in the United States. METHODS In this retrospective study, consecutive patients from 13 centers across 11 states who presented with a chest pain syndrome and were referred for stress CMR were followed for a target period of 4 years. The authors associated CMR findings with a primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction using competing risk-adjusted regression models and downstream costs of ischemia testing using published Medicare national payment rates. RESULTS In this study, 2,349 patients (63 ± 11 years of age, 47% female) were followed for a median of 5.4 years. Patients with no ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR, observed in 1,583 patients (67%), experienced low annualized rates of primary outcome (<1%) and coronary revascularization (1% to 3%), across all years of study follow-up. In contrast, patients with ischemia+/LGE+ experienced a >4-fold higher annual primary outcome rate and a >10-fold higher rate of coronary revascularization during the first year after CMR. Patients with ischemia and LGE both negative had low average annual cost spent on ischemia testing across all years of follow-up, and this pattern was similar across the 4 practice environments of the participating centers. CONCLUSIONS In a multicenter U.S. cohort with stable chest pain syndromes, stress CMR performed at experienced centers offers effective cardiac prognostication. Patients without CMR ischemia or LGE experienced a low incidence of cardiac events, little need for coronary revascularization, and low spending on subsequent ischemia testing. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS]: A Society for Cardiovascular Resonance Registry Study; NCT03192891 )
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Long-term prognostic value of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients without known coronary artery disease

              Background To assess the incremental long-term prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Between 2010 and 2011, consecutive patients with cardiovascular risk factors without known CAD referred for stress CMR were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular mortality or recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). Uni- and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of ischemia and unrecognized MI defined by sub-endocardial or transmural late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Results Among 2,295 patients without known CAD, 2058 (89.7%) (71.2 ± 12.5 years; 37.5% males) completed the follow-up (median [IQR]: 8.3 [7.3–8.7] years), and 203 had MACE (9.9%). Using Kaplan–Meier analysis, ischemia and unrecognized MI were associated with MACE (hazard ratio, HR: 4.64 95% CI: 3.69–6.17 and HR: 2.88; 95% CI: 2.08–3.99, respectively; both p < 0.001). In multivariable stepwise Cox regression, ischemia and unrecognized MI were independent predictors of MACE (HR = 3.71; 95% CI 2.73–5.05, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.22–2.45, p = 0.002; respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 3.13; 95% CI: 2.17–4.51, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.15–2.62, p = 0.009; respectively). The addition of ischemia and unrecognized MI led to an improved model discrimination for MACE (change in C statistic from 0.61 to 0.72; NRI = 0.431; IDI = 0.053). Conclusions Inducible ischemia and unrecognized MI identified by stress CMR have incremental long term prognostic value for the incidence of MACE in patients without known CAD over traditional risk factors and left ventricular ejection fraction. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-021-00737-0.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                29 August 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 995752
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé , Massy, France
                [2] 2Université de Paris Cité, Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière—APHP, Inserm UMRS 942 , Paris, France
                [3] 3Siemens Healthcare France Saint-Denis , Bavaria, France
                [4] 4Independent Biostatistician , Pérouges, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Carla Sousa, São João University Hospital Center, Portugal

                Reviewed by: Mariana Vasconcelos, São João University Hospital Center, Portugal; Tania Proença, São João University Hospital Center, Portugal

                *Correspondence: Jérôme Garot jgarot@ 123456angio-icps.com

                This article was submitted to Cardiovascular Imaging, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2022.995752
                9465505
                780e89d7-7c35-4e1d-a2f0-84d331d02b4e
                Copyright © 2022 Pezel, Garot, Unterseeh, Hovasse, Sanguineti, Toupin, Morisset, Champagne and Garot.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 July 2022
                : 09 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 5, Pages: 03, Words: 1738
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Opinion

                cardiovascular magnetic resonance (cmr),stress test,follow-up,prognosis,death

                Comments

                Comment on this article