4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Characterization of supports activated with divinyl sulfone as a tool to immobilize and stabilize enzymes via multipoint covalent attachment. Application to chymotrypsin

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DVS supports are very suitable to stabilize enzymes via multipoint covalent attachment.

          Abstract

          Divinyl sulfone (DVS) has been used to activate agarose beads. The DVS activated agarose resulted quite stable in the pH range 5–10 at 25 °C under wet conditions, and can react rapidly with α-amides of Cys and His, at pH 5–10, with Lys mainly at pH 10 and with Tyr in a much slower fashion. After blocking with different nucleophiles, the support lost all reactivity, confirming that this protocol could be useful as an enzyme–support reaction end point. Then, chymotrypsin was immobilized on this support at pH 5, 7 and 10. Even though the enzyme was immobilized at all pH values, the immobilization rate decreased with the pH value. The effect of the immobilization on the activity depended on the immobilization pH, at pH 7 the activity decreased (to 50%) more than at pH 10 (by a 25%), while at pH 5 the immobilization has no effect. Then, the effect of blocking with different reagents was analyzed. It was found that blocking with ethylenediamine improved the enzyme activity by 70% and gave the best stability. The stability of all enzyme preparations improved when 24 h incubation was performed at pH 10, but the qualitative stabilization depended on the inactivation conditions. The analysis of the amino acids of the preparation immobilized at pH 10 showed that Lys, Tyr and Cys residues were involved in the immobilization, involving a minimum of 10 residues (glyoxyl agarose gave 4 Lys involved in the immobilization). The new preparation was 4–5 fold more stable than glyoxyl agarose preparation, considered a very stable one, and in some instances was more active than the free enzyme (170% for the enzyme immobilized at pH 10). Thus, DVS activated supports are very promising to permit the multipoint covalent attachment of enzymes, and that way to improve their stability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization.

          Immobilization of enzymes may produce alterations in their observed activity, specificity or selectivity. Although in many cases an impoverishment of the enzyme properties is observed upon immobilization (caused by the distortion of the enzyme due to the interaction with the support) in some instances such properties may be enhanced by this immobilization. These alterations in enzyme properties are sometimes associated with changes in the enzyme structure. Occasionally, these variations will be positive. For example, they may be related to the stabilization of a hyperactivated form of the enzyme, like in the case of lipases immobilized on hydrophobic supports via interfacial activation. In some other instances, these improvements will be just a consequence of random modifications in the enzyme properties that in some reactions will be positive while in others may be negative. For this reason, the preparation of a library of biocatalysts as broad as possible may be a key turning point to find an immobilized biocatalyst with improved properties when compared to the free enzyme. Immobilized enzymes will be dispersed on the support surface and aggregation will no longer be possible, while the free enzyme may suffer aggregation, which greatly decreases enzyme activity. Moreover, enzyme rigidification may lead to preservation of the enzyme properties under drastic conditions in which the enzyme tends to become distorted thus decreasing its activity. Furthermore, immobilization of enzymes on a support, mainly on a porous support, may in many cases also have a positive impact on the observed enzyme behavior, not really related to structural changes. For example, the promotion of diffusional problems (e.g., pH gradients, substrate or product gradients), partition (towards or away from the enzyme environment, for substrate or products), or the blocking of some areas (e.g., reducing inhibitions) may greatly improve enzyme performance. Thus, in this tutorial review, we will try to list and explain some of the main reasons that may produce an improvement in enzyme activity, specificity or selectivity, either real or apparent, due to immobilization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Potential of Different Enzyme Immobilization Strategies to Improve Enzyme Performance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Glutaraldehyde in bio-catalysts design: a useful crosslinker and a versatile tool in enzyme immobilization

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                RSCACL
                RSC Advances
                RSC Adv.
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2046-2069
                2015
                2015
                : 5
                : 27
                : 20639-20649
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ICP-CSIC
                [2 ]Departamento de Biocatálisis
                [3 ]Instituto de Catálisis-CSIC
                [4 ]28049 Madrid
                [5 ]Spain
                [6 ]Facultad de Ciencias
                [7 ]Departamento de Química
                [8 ]Universidad del Tolima
                [9 ]Ibagué
                [10 ]Colombia
                [11 ]Department of Analytical Chemistry
                [12 ]University of Granada
                [13 ]18071 Granada
                [14 ]NanoMyP
                [15 ]Nanomateriales y Polimeros S.L.
                [16 ]Spin-Off company of the UGR
                [17 ]Granada
                [18 ]Instituto de la Grasa-CSIC
                [19 ]41012 Sevilla
                [20 ]Departamento de Engenharia Química
                [21 ]Universidade Federal do Ceará
                [22 ]Fortaleza
                [23 ]Brazil
                Article
                10.1039/C4RA16926C
                78cdb169-fe6e-4d8d-ad2f-d0a3d81ac574
                © 2015
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article