0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early intervention for children at risk of visual processing dysfunctions from 1 year of age: a randomized controlled trial protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          An increasing number of children are suffering from brain damage-related visual processing dysfunctions (VPD). There is currently a lack of evidence-based intervention methods that can be used early in development. We developed a visual intervention protocol suitable from 1 year of age. The protocol is structured, comprehensive and individually adaptive, and is paired with quantitative outcome assessments. Our aim is to investigate the effectiveness of this first visual intervention program for young children with (a risk of) VPD.

          Methods

          This is a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial that is embedded within standard clinical care. The study population consists of 100 children born very or extremely preterm (< 30 weeks) at 1 year of corrected age (CA), of whom 50% are expected to have VPD. First, children undergo a visual screening at 1 year CA. If they are classified as being at risk of VPD, they are referred to standard care, which involves an ophthalmic and visual function assessment and a (newly developed) visual intervention program. This program consists of a general protocol (standardized and similar for all children) and a supplement protocol (adapted to the specific needs of the child). Children are randomly allocated to an intervention group (starting upon inclusion at 1 year CA) or a control group (postponed: starting at 2 years CA). The control group will receive a placebo treatment. The effectiveness of early visual intervention will be examined with follow-up visual and neurocognitive assessments after 1 year (upon completion of the direct intervention) and after 2 years (upon completion of the postponed intervention).

          Discussion

          Through this randomized controlled trial we will establish the effectiveness of a new and early visual intervention program. Combining a general and supplement protocol enables both structured comparisons between participants and groups, and custom habilitation that is tailored to a child’s specific needs. The design ensures that all included children will benefit from participation by advancing the age at which they start receiving an intervention. We expect results to be applicable to the overall population of children with (a risk of) VPD early in life.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands Trial Register: NTR6952. Registered 19 January 2018.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: evidence from visually deprived children.

          Psychophysical studies of children deprived of early visual experience by dense cataracts indicate that there are multiple sensitive periods during which experience can influence visual development. We note three sensitive periods within acuity, each with different developmental time courses: the period of visually-driven normal development, the sensitive period for damage, and the sensitive period for recovery. Moreover, there are different sensitive periods for different aspects of vision. Relative to the period of visually driven normal development, the sensitive period for damage is surprisingly long for acuity, peripheral vision, and asymmetry of optokinetic nystagmus, but surprisingly short for global motion. A comparison of results from unilaterally versus bilaterally deprived children provides insights into the complex nature of interactions between the eyes during normal visual development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders: underlying neural mechanisms.

            Neurodevelopmental disorders affect motor, cognitive, language, learning, and behavioural development with lifelong consequences. Early identification of infants at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders is a major prerequisite for intervention programmes. This ensures that interventions which aim to positively modify the natural history of these disorders can start in the first weeks or months of life. As indicated by recent scientific evidence, gene abnormalities or congenital brain lesions are not the sole determinants for the neurodevelopmental outcome of affected infants. In fact, environment and experience may modify brain development and improve the outcome in infants at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. In this review, we analyse the complexity and sensitivity of the brain to environmental stimuli, highlighting clinical effects of early intervention, mainly reported so far in preterm infants, and summarizing the effects of enriched environment on human and animal models. Finally, we discuss some new approaches to early intervention, based on recent neurophysiological theories and new breakthroughs in biotechnologies for diagnosis and rehabilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of visual impairment in children: a review of available data.

              Data on the prevalence, magnitude and causes of blindness and severe visual impairment in children are needed for planning and evaluating preventive and curative services for children, and for planning special education and low vision services. Prevalence data can be obtained from a variety of different sources, each of which has limitations. The available data suggest that there may be a ten-fold difference in prevalence between the wealthiest countries of the world and the poorest, ranging from as low as 0.1/1000 children aged 0-15 years in the wealthiest countries to 1.1/1000 children in the poorest. In this paper, the available data are reviewed and the epidemiological methods and findings are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.kooiker@erasmusmc.nl
                yonivanderlinden@visio.org
                jennekevandijk@visio.org
                ymievanderzee@visio.org
                r.swarte@erasmusmc.nl
                l.s.smit@erasmusmc.nl
                sannyvandersteen@xs4all.nl
                s.loudon@erasmusmc.nl
                i.reiss@erasmusmc.nl
                keeskuyper@visio.org
                j.pel@erasmusmc.nl
                j.vandersteen@erasmusmc.nl
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                8 January 2020
                8 January 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 44
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 000000040459992X, GRID grid.5645.2, Department of Neuroscience, , Erasmus Medical Center, ; PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Royal Dutch Visio, Center of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, the Hague, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Royal Dutch Visio, Center of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.416135.4, Department of Pediatrics, , Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.416135.4, Department of Neurology, , Division of Pediatric Neurology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Royal Dutch Visio, Center of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Huizen, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.416135.4, Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, , Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-0045
                Article
                3936
                10.1186/s13063-019-3936-9
                6950993
                31915035
                795db000-a7e8-4bf8-bc89-67d20d365efe
                © The Author(s). 2020

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 June 2019
                : 26 November 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Stichting NOVUM
                Award ID: OI0342
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                visual intervention,visual habilitation,cerebral visual impairment,neurological risk,eye tracking,visual attention,visual processing,brain damage,children born preterm

                Comments

                Comment on this article