3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of graft and patient outcomes following kidney transplantation in extended hour and conventional haemodialysis patients.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Differences in early graft function between kidney transplant recipients previously managed with either haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis are well described. However, only two single-centre studies have compared graft and patient outcomes between extended hour and conventional HD patients, with conflicting results.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Nephrology (Carlton)
          Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)
          Wiley
          1440-1797
          1320-5358
          Jan 2019
          : 24
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
          [2 ] Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
          [3 ] School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
          [4 ] Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
          [5 ] Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
          [6 ] Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
          [7 ] Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
          [8 ] Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
          [9 ] Department of Nephrology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
          Article
          10.1111/nep.13221
          29316017

          Comments

          Comment on this article