3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Validity of common physical function tests performed online for older adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Objectively measured physical function tests are important predictors of institutionalization, disability, and premature mortality. Although physical function was usually assessed in person prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to investigate whether physical function tests performed online are valid.

          Objective

          The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of common physical function tests conducted online compared to in-person testing in older adults.

          Methods

          Physical functions included gait speed, one leg stance balance, 30-second chair stands, and the 2-minute steps were tested online and in-person using a random order for community dwellers aged 65 years and above. Using an alpha two way mixed model, average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated between the two settings and one sample T-test performed on the difference between the results of each test between the two settings. Finally, Bland-Altman plots were created, and proportional biases tested via linear regressions.

          Results

          Besides the one-leg stance balance with eyes closed, for which the ICC was 0.47 (0.23-0.74) the average ICC's were excellent ranging from 0.87 to 0.94. No proportional biases were observed based on Bland-Altman graphs.

          Conclusion

          For older adults living in the community, common physical function tests can be performed online.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

          Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.

            Reliability, the consistency of a test or measurement, is frequently quantified in the movement sciences literature. A common metric is the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition, the SEM, which can be calculated from the ICC, is also frequently reported in reliability studies. However, there are several versions of the ICC, and confusion exists in the movement sciences regarding which ICC to use. Further, the utility of the SEM is not fully appreciated. In this review, the basics of classic reliability theory are addressed in the context of choosing and interpreting an ICC. The primary distinction between ICC equations is argued to be one concerning the inclusion (equations 2,1 and 2,k) or exclusion (equations 3,1 and 3,k) of systematic error in the denominator of the ICC equation. Inferential tests of mean differences, which are performed in the process of deriving the necessary variance components for the calculation of ICC values, are useful to determine if systematic error is present. If so, the measurement schedule should be modified (removing trials where learning and/or fatigue effects are present) to remove systematic error, and ICC equations that only consider random error may be safely used. The use of ICC values is discussed in the context of estimating the effects of measurement error on sample size, statistical power, and correlation attenuation. Finally, calculation and application of the SEM are discussed. It is shown how the SEM and its variants can be used to construct confidence intervals for individual scores and to determine the minimal difference needed to be exhibited for one to be confident that a true change in performance of an individual has occurred.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and validation of criterion-referenced clinically relevant fitness standards for maintaining physical independence in later years.

              To develop and validate criterion-referenced fitness standards for older adults that predict the level of capacity needed for maintaining physical independence into later life. The proposed standards were developed for use with a previously validated test battery for older adults-the Senior Fitness Test (Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (2001). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community--residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 127-159; Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999a). Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.). A criterion measure to assess physical independence was identified. Next, scores from a subset of 2,140 "moderate-functioning" older adults from a larger cross-sectional database, together with findings from longitudinal research on physical capacity and aging, were used as the basis for proposing fitness standards (performance cut points) associated with having the ability to function independently. Validity and reliability analyses were conducted to test the standards for their accuracy and consistency as predictors of physical independence. Performance standards are presented for men and women ages 60-94 indicating the level of fitness associated with remaining physically independent until late in life. Reliability and validity indicators for the standards ranged between .79 and .97. The proposed standards provide easy-to-use, previously unavailable methods for evaluating physical capacity in older adults relative to that associated with physical independence. Most importantly, the standards can be used in planning interventions that target specific areas of weakness, thus reducing risk for premature loss of mobility and independence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Gerontol Geriatr
                Arch Gerontol Geriatr
                Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
                Elsevier B.V.
                0167-4943
                1872-6976
                15 June 2023
                November 2023
                15 June 2023
                : 114
                : 105104
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
                [b ]Cardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyles Laboratory (CELLAB), Canada
                [c ]Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Co-Director: Cardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyle Laboratory (CELLAB), Affiliated Member of IMPART Team Canada, 90 Mackay Drive, (Room 322), Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.
                Article
                S0167-4943(23)00182-6 105104
                10.1016/j.archger.2023.105104
                10285319
                7aaaa5c9-f11b-4b21-a7d7-c4fae5cd0c94
                © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 6 September 2022
                : 13 June 2023
                : 14 June 2023
                Categories
                Article

                physical function tests,intraclass correlation coefficient,validity,older adults,bland-altman,virtual

                Comments

                Comment on this article