21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transarterial chemoembolization is ineffective for neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the caudate lobe: a single institution review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Caudate lobe liver metastases occur commonly in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. It is unknown, however, how these lesions respond to regional therapy and how their presence impacts outcomes. We reviewed our experience treating these lesions using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

          Methods

          We reviewed radiographic response to TACE in 86 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors to the liver. We determined the impact of caudate lesions on outcomes in comparison to the cohort of patients without caudate lesions, as well as response of caudate lesions to TACE versus lesions elsewhere in the liver.

          Results

          Caudate lesions were identified in 45 (52%) patients. All patients had disease in other liver segments. Only seven caudate lesions (12.3%) had a radiographic response to TACE, whereas 82% of lesions elsewhere in the liver demonstrated a response. The presence or absence of a caudate lesion did not impact the overall radiographic (82.2% vs. 82.9%), symptomatic (64.4% vs. 56.1%), or biochemical (97.6% vs. 88.9%) response to TACE ( P > 0.1 for all). However, median overall survival was reduced in those presenting with caudate lesions (87.1 vs. 45.6 months, P = 0.031).

          Conclusions

          Metastatic neuroendocrine tumors to the caudate lobe respond poorly to TACE. Symptomatic or threatening caudate lobe lesions should be considered for palliative resection in spite of additional inoperable liver metastases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Liver anatomy.

          Understanding the complexities of the liver has been a long-standing challenge to physicians and anatomists. Significant strides in the understanding of hepatic anatomy have facilitated major progress in liver-directed therapies--surgical interventions, such as transplantation, hepatic resection, hepatic artery infusion pumps, and hepatic ablation, and interventional radiologic procedures, such as transarterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiation therapy, and portal vein embolization. Without understanding hepatic anatomy, such progressive interventions would not be feasible. This article reviews the history, general anatomy, and the classification schemes of liver anatomy and their relevance to liver-directed therapies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hepatic arterial embolization and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: variables affecting response rates and survival.

            The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic variables that influence response and survival in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors who are treated with hepatic arterial embolization (HAE) or chemoembolization (HACE). Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent HAE or HACE were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up imaging studies were compared with baseline imaging to determine the radiologic response. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic variables that affected response and survival. The study included 69 patients with carcinoid tumors and 54 patients with pancreatic islet cell carcinomas. Patients who had carcinoid tumors had a higher response rate (66.7% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.0001) and had longer PFS (22.7 mos vs. 16.1 mos; P = 0.046) and OS (33.8 mos vs. 23.2 mos; P = 0.012) compared with patients who had islet cell carcinomas. For patients with carcinoid tumors, multivariate analysis identified male gender as the only independent risk factor for poor survival (P = 0.05). Octreotide was predictive marginally for PFS (P = 0.06). Patients who were treated with HAE had a higher response rate than patients who were treated with HACE (P = 0.004). For patients with islet cell carcinoma, an intact primary tumor, > or = 75% liver involvement, and extrahepatic metastases were associated with reduced OS in the univariate analysis; the presence of bone metastases was the only risk factor (P = 0.031) in the multivariate analysis. Patients who were treated with HACE had a prolonged OS (31.5 mos vs. 18.2 mos) and improved response (50% vs. 25%) compared with patients who were treated with HAE, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients with carcinoid tumors had better outcomes than patients with islet cell carcinomas. The addition of intraarterial chemotherapy to HAE did not improve the outcome of patients with carcinoid tumors, but it seemed to benefit patients with islet cell carcinomas. In patients who had carcinoid tumors, male gender predicted a poor outcome, and a trend toward prolonged PFS was observed in patients who received concomitant octreotide. An intact primary tumor, extensive liver disease, and bone metastases were associated with reduced survival in patients with islet cell carcinomas. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Karnofsky memorial lecture. An odyssey in the land of small tumors.

              C MOERTEL (1987)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lawrence.shirley@osumc.edu
                memcnally81@gmail.com
                chokshrj@njms.rutgers.edu
                jonesnatalieb@gmail.com
                p.t.tassone@gmail.com
                Gregory.guy@osumc.edu
                hooman.khabiri@osumc.edu
                carl.schmidt@osumc.edu
                manisha.shah@osumc.edu
                mark.bloomston@osumc.edu
                Journal
                World J Surg Oncol
                World J Surg Oncol
                World Journal of Surgical Oncology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7819
                1 May 2015
                1 May 2015
                2015
                : 13
                : 167
                Affiliations
                [ ]Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, N924 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Saint Luke’s Health System and University of Missouri-Kansas City, 100 NE St. Lukes Blvd, Lee’s Summit, MO 64086 USA
                [ ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers University-New Jersey Medical School, 205 South Orange Avenue, G-1222, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Riverside Methodist Hospital, 1654 Upham Dr., Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [ ]Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, 6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
                [ ]Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Room 460, 395 W. 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [ ]Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 4th Floor Starling Loving Hall, 320 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                Article
                551
                10.1186/s12957-015-0551-4
                4423113
                25927667
                7da67895-2c82-410e-819b-ad092c1e2bd4
                © Shirley et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 December 2014
                : 16 March 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Surgery
                neuroendocrine tumors,liver metastases,locoregional therapy,interventional radiology
                Surgery
                neuroendocrine tumors, liver metastases, locoregional therapy, interventional radiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article