10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sex and stress: Men and women show different cortisol responses to psychological stress induced by the Trier social stress test and the Iowa singing social stress test : Sex and the Trier and Iowa Singing Social Stress Tests

      , , ,
      Journal of Neuroscience Research
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">Acute psychological stress affects each of us in our daily lives and is increasingly a topic of discussion for its role in mental illness, aging, cognition, and overall health. Better understanding of how such stress affects the body and mind could contribute to the development of more effective clinical interventions and prevention practices. Over the past three decades, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) has been widely used to induce acute stress in a laboratory setting based on the principles of social evaluative threat - namely, a judged speech-making task. A comparable alternative task may expand options for examining acute stress in a controlled laboratory setting. Here, we used a within-subjects design to examine healthy adult participants’ ( <i>n</i>=20 men, <i>n</i>=20 women) subjective stress and salivary cortisol responses to the standard TSST (involving public speaking and math) and the newly created Iowa Singing Social Stress Test (I-SSST). The I-SSST is similar to the TSST, but with a new twist: public <i>singing</i>. Results indicate that men and women reported similarly high levels of subjective stress in response to both tasks. However, men and women demonstrated different cortisol responses: men showed a robust response to both tasks, and women displayed a smaller response. These findings are consistent with previous literature, and further underscore the importance of examining possible sex differences throughout various phases of research, including design, analysis, and interpretation of results. Furthermore, this nascent examination of the I-SSST suggests a possible alternative for inducing stress in the laboratory. </p><p id="P2"> <div class="figure-container so-text-align-c"> <img alt="" class="figure" src="/document_file/5febc598-59eb-4932-970c-b9a9cc8b8c36/PubMedCentral/image/nihms801226f5.jpg"/> </div> </p><p id="P3">Mean change in salivary cortisol (nmol/L) from baseline over time after the Iowa Singing Social Stress Test (I-SSST) for women (gray circles) and men (black squares; n = 36). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. The figure presents untransformed change values, while the reported analysis in text used natural log transformed data. </p><p id="P4">The Iowa Singing Social Stress Test - a novel, musical stress task - elicited responses similar to those induced by the Trier Social Stress Test. We found a robust sex difference in cortisol response yet no sex difference in subjective stress. Our results suggest an alternative acute stress induction method. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neural systems for recognizing emotion.

          Recognition of emotion draws on a distributed set of structures that include the occipitotemporal neocortex, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex and right frontoparietal cortices. Recognition of fear may draw especially on the amygdala and the detection of disgust may rely on the insula and basal ganglia. Two important mechanisms for recognition of emotions are the construction of a simulation of the observed emotion in the perceiver, and the modulation of sensory cortices via top-down influences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sex differences and stress across the lifespan.

              Sex differences in stress responses can be found at all stages of life and are related to both the organizational and activational effects of gonadal hormones and to genes on the sex chromosomes. As stress dysregulation is the most common feature across neuropsychiatric diseases, sex differences in how these pathways develop and mature may predict sex-specific periods of vulnerability to disruption and increased disease risk or resilience across the lifespan. The aging brain is also at risk to the effects of stress, where the rapid decline of gonadal hormones in women combined with cellular aging processes promote sex biases in stress dysregulation. In this Review, we discuss potential underlying mechanisms driving sex differences in stress responses and their relevance to disease. Although stress is involved in a much broader range of diseases than neuropsychiatric ones, we highlight here this area and its examples across the lifespan.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Neuroscience Research
                Journal of Neuroscience Research
                Wiley
                03604012
                January 02 2017
                January 02 2017
                : 95
                : 1-2
                : 106-114
                Article
                10.1002/jnr.23851
                5120613
                27870432
                7de43078-9586-4be0-b7dd-04ba4d909682
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article